Free Stipulation - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 10.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 406 Words, 2,683 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8690/511.pdf

Download Stipulation - District Court of Delaware ( 10.0 kB)


Preview Stipulation - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF

Document 511

Filed 07/27/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE COMPUTER, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

C.A. No. 04-1338-KAJ (consolidated)

STIPULATION AND ORDER WHEREAS plaintiffs Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc. (collectively, "Honeywell") have filed a First (Second) Amended Complaint and demand for jury trial in the above-referenced matter. WHEREAS, the First (Second) Amended Complaint names as defendant BOE HYDIS Technology Co., Ltd. ("BOE HYDIS"); and WHEREAS, BOE HYDIS has identified, in its discovery responses a subsidiary, BOE HYDIS America, Inc. ("BHA"), that sells LCD modules that may become relevant to the above-referenced matter; and WHEREAS, Honeywell and BOE HYDIS agree to direct, for now, Honeywell's claims only against BOE HYDIS to streamline the litigation and avoid unnecessary time and expense to the Court and to the parties; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, Honeywell and BOE HYDIS hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF

Document 511

Filed 07/27/2006

Page 2 of 2

1.

Based upon the agreements contained herein, Honeywell will not further

amend its first amended complaint to add as defendants any subsidiaries, affiliates or other related entities of BOE HYDIS identified in its discovery responses; 2. BOE HYDIS represents that it has access to, and thus agrees to produce in

this matter, relevant documentation and testimony from BHA, notwithstanding that BHA is not a named party in this matter. 3. BOE HYDIS agrees that it will be bound by any judgment against it as a

result of the conduct of BHA. 6. BOE HYDIS has authorized its undersigned counsel to enter into this

stipulation on its behalf. MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP /s/ Maria Granovsky Thomas C. Grimm (#1098) Leslie A. Polizoti (#4299) Maria Granovsky (#4709) 1201 N. Market Street P. O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 (302) 658-9200 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc. POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP /s/ David E. Moore Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) David E. Moore (#3983) Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor 1313 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 981-6000 [email protected] [email protected]

Attorneys for BOE HYDIS Technology Co., Ltd.

IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of ______________________, 2006

____________________________ United States District Court Judge
530387

2