Free Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California - California


File Size: 35.3 kB
Pages: 1
Date: August 20, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 302 Words, 1,906 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/casd/275838/10.pdf

Download Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California ( 35.3 kB)


Preview Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cr-02522-LAB

Document 10

Filed 08/20/2008

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER THEREON CASE NO.: 08cr2522 LAB TITLE: USA v. Esparza-Perez E-FILED DATE: 8/13/08 DOCUMENT TITLE: Motion DOCUMENT FILED David Leshner for USA BY:

DOCKET NO.: 8

Upon the electronic filing of the above referenced document(s), the following discrepancies are noted: x Civil Local Rule or Discrepancy
Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual provision ("ECF")

ECF § 2(h) ECF § 2(a), (g) ECF § 2(g) ECF § 2(f) Civ. L. Rule 5.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 X Crim. L. Rule 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 or 47.1 Civ. L. Rule 7.1 Civ. L. Rule 15.1

Includes a proposed order or requires judge's signature Docket entry does not accurately reflect the document(s) filed Multiple pleadings in one docket entry not separated out as attachments Lacking proper signature Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation Date noticed for hearing not in compliance with rules/document(s) are not timely Lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document Briefs or memoranda exceed length restrictions Missing table of contents and/or table of authorities Amended pleading not complete in itself OTHER:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents X may be stricken from the record. The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties. Counsel is advised that any further failure to comply with the Local Rules or Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual may lead to penalties pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.1.

DATED: August 19, 2008

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS United States District Judge