Free SO ORDERED - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

- , Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF Document 710 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
A I N THE INITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A I · ` _
‘ - ` FOR DISTRICT OF DELAWARE p _ I _
at HONEYWELL NTERNATIONAL INC. I ) . I ` I I A 1
and HONEYWELL NTELLECTUAL ) ` _ -
PROPERTIES INC., ` ) · · . -
‘ ) CA No 04-1338-*** I A
E i . PlmmffS’ A g t (¢¤¤S¤1id¤*>¢d) i .a_1 B
· A
I "· g _.]URY TRIAL DEMANDEEI t“"“‘trrtMr°~"rr#*~i* M Q
APPLE COMPUTER, NC., et al., g FEB _ 9 mm
_ Defendants. ) . ........
- - . g $5:.;:,.,,:-,tf;?# ire. ~_#£;.%$13Ui·i`F C] -
‘ .. .. ..... . .....__ _7i.y_ 1_: a,. ‘r j E fl, j
· . STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL ‘ ‘··· ~· .
Plaintiffs HONEYWELL NTERNATIONAL NC. and n HONEYWELL `
I NTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES NC. . and Defendant TPO DISPLAYS CORPORATION1
(cgllgctjvgly "thg Pa1·{j€g”) have Settled this ac{l01tl €I1tCI`Cd IIIIO EL1'1 AgI`€€ITi€Ht h&ViHg an _
effective date of January 31, 2007 ("Agreement”), which sets out the tenns and conditionsof that · A
settlement. As part of the Agreement, the Parties stipulate as follows: I `
1. The Parties consent to the jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge Mary Pat U ‘ _
I Thynge under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (a) with respect to those claims brought in this action by Plaintiffs. - Z
against Defendant TPO Displays Corporationland not with respect to any other claim in this . R
action-and (b) for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the Agreement.
2. This Court has jurisdiction over (na) the subject matter of this action and (b) the
Parties to this action; and venue is properly laid. I I
I I 3. For the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the Agreement, this Court retains . I
.1
continuing exclusive jurisdiction over the Parties and the subject matter hereto. j `
‘ A _ On Jtme 5, 2006, named—defendant Toppoly Optoelectronics Corporation changed the
English language translation of its name to TPO Displays Corporation. _ ‘ . j
1

- Case 1 :04-cv-01338-JJF Document 710 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 2 of 2 · I
l 4. A As a result of the Agreement, Defendant TPO Displays Corporation- is hereby
l dismissed as Defendant from this action. _ g . _ l
I 5. I Each Party to this Stipulation shall bear its owr1 costs and attomeys’ fees incurred I _
in thisiaction. - I - , · _ 9
MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & POTTER ANDERSON `& CORROON LLP ` E
TUNNELL LLP ` ` . _
By: /s/ Leslie A. Polizoti ` By: /s/ David E. Moore l i ‘
Thomas C. Grimm (#1098) _· Richard L. Horwitz (#2246) ·
` _ Leslie A. Polizoti (#4299) ‘ David E. Moore (#3983) ` ‘ (
- Maria Granovsky (#4709) g - Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor . _ [
1201 N. Market Street ` ` 1313 N. Market Street . ` -
P.O. Box 1347 l l P.O. Box 951- ` `
Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 _ Wilmington, DE 19899
o (302) 658-9200 (302) 984-6000 ‘
[email protected] _ · dmoore@potte1·anderson.com I r
Attorneys for Plaint@v Honeywell _ Attorneys for Ddendant - I _
International Inc. and Honeywell - TPO Displays Corporation P ‘ n I ‘ _
- Intellectual Properties Inc. .
` SO ORDERED this /2.- daynof February, 2007.` - I · _ ‘ _
I / ,_ I I . , 3 1
nited States Magi a _ u . i` _ in ‘ l
nmszv.1 ` . _ ‘ o 1