Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of California - California

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130 +1 858 523 6200

Ali M.M. Mojdehi, State Bar No. 123846 Janet D. Gertz, State Bar No. 231172 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130-3051 Telephone: +1 858-523-6200 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re JERRY LEE ICENHOWER dba Seaview Properties, and DONNA LEE ICENHOWER, Debtors. ALEJANDRO DIAZ-BARBA AND MARTHA MARGARITA BARBA DE LA TORRE, Defendants/Appellants, v. KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee.

Case No.: 3:08-CV-01446-BTM-BLM Bankruptcy Case No. 03-11155-LA-7 Chapter Number 7 Adv. Proc. No: 04-90392 Adv. Proc. No.: 06-90369 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DIAZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL DATE: August 28, 2008 TIME 4:00 p.m. DEPT: 15 JUDGE: Hon. Barry Ted Moskowitz

/// /// /// /// /// /// 1
CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01446-BTM-BLM REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DIAZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL SDODMS1/692910.1

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 11 12 3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 7 5 4

Pursuant to Rule 9017 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Plaintiff/Appellee Kismet Acquisition, LLC requests this Court to take judicial notice of the following documents in support of their Opposition to the Diaz Defendants' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal: DOCUMENT NAME

EXHIBIT NO. 1

DATE

Memorandum of Decision and Order re: Filed November 23, 2003 Damages; and Directing Entry of Judgment, Lonie v. Icenhower, United States District Court, Southern District of California, Civ. No. 00-CV-612L(LSP) Plaintiff's Trial Demonstrative, "More Read into Record at Trial April 25, Red Flags for Diaz" 2008 Villa Vista Hermosa, Puerta Vallarta Hotel/Villa, available at http://villavistahermosa.com/ tourint.htm (last visited August 22, 2008) Order on Diaz Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Adversary Proceeding No. 0490392 Diaz Defendants' Supplemental Trial Brief, Adversary Proceedings Nos. 0490392; 06-90369 Pre-Trial Order, Adversary No. 0690369 Pre-Trial Order, Adversary No. 0490392 Respectfully submitted, Printed from web site August 22, 2008

Entered February 13, 2007

Filed April 25, 2008

Entered April 21, 2008 Entered April 18, 2008

Dated: August 22, 2008

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP

By: /s/ Ali M.M. Mojdehi Ali M.M. Mojdehi Janet D. Gertz Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellee Kismet Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 2

Baker & McKenzie LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130 +1 858 523 6200

CASE NO. 3:08-CV-01446-BTM-BLM REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE BY PLAINTIFF, KISMET ACQUISITION, LLC, IN SUPPORT OF ITS OPPOSITION TO DIAZ DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL SDODMS1/692910.1

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-2

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 7

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-2

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 2 of 7

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-2

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 3 of 7

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-2

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 4 of 7

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-2

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 5 of 7

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-2

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 6 of 7

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-2

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 7 of 7

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 10

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 2 of 10

Red Flags for Diaz/Barba
Diaz is first introduced to Jerry Icenhower by Eugene Kocherga in early 2003 to discuss purchase of Villa. Diaz understands at the time that Jerry Icenhower is the owner of the Villa. Diaz meets Jerry again at the Villa in August `03, the time of Eugene Kocherga's wedding. Diaz talks to the Villa housekeeper, Elba, who tells Diaz that Jerry Icenhower has difficulty paying the bills and always needs money. Diaz's due diligence reveals that Icenhower is not the owner but is the prior owner of the beneficial trust interest before Howell & Gardner, the current owner. Notwithstanding, Diaz sees Icenhower still in control of the property, receiving the income from the rentals, paying the staff, and is the contact listed on the web site advertising the property: villavistahermosa.com. Diaz's due diligence reveals that Icenhower had obtained his beneficial trust interest in the Villa from D. Donald Lonie.

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 3 of 10

More Red Flags for Diaz/Barba
Jerry Icenhower tells Diaz during due diligence that he is in litigation with the Lonie family. Pending Action No. Lonie et al v. Icenhower, US Dist. Court, SD Cal., 00-CV-612, Lonie v. Icenhower, is a public record. Despite recently having sold a property valued at $1.5 million in 2002, in October 2003, Icenhower comes to Diaz for a loan. Diaz agrees to "loan" Icenhower $100,000, with the understanding that the amount will be treated as a down payment towards Diaz's purchase of the Villa Vista Hermosa beneficial trust interest. Icenhower files bankruptcy in December 2003.

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 4 of 10

More Red Flags for Diaz/Barba
On December 16, 2003 Diaz receives the Notice of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case, Meeting of Creditors, & Deadlines, including the Debtors' first Meeting of Creditors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 341. The certificate of service Diaz also received shows that Stephen Lonie and Thos. Lonie Jr. also received notice. Notice of Bankruptcy Case Filing says: "If you would like to view the bankruptcy petition and other documents filed by the debtor, they are available at our Internet home page http://www.casb.uscourts.gov or at the Clerk's Office, Jacob Weinberger U.S. Courthouse, 325 West F Street, San Diego, CA 92101-6991." Diaz is worried about Icenhower's bankruptcy and has a conversation with Icenhower about it. Icenhower tells Diaz that he was forced to declare bankruptcy because of litigation with the Lonie Trust over the Villa

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 5 of 10

More Red Flags for Diaz/Barba
Icenhower tells Diaz about the litigation with the Lonie Trust in the Bankruptcy Court. Diaz tells Icenhower that his attorney has told him that transaction cannot be avoided under Mexican law Icenhower's Petition lists as creditors Stephen Lonie and Thomas Lonie, Jr., and reflects that the obligation was incurred in 1993 "Statement of decision issued; judgment to be entered $1,356,830.00 and lists Lonie et al v. Icenhower, US Dist. Court, SD Cal., 00-CV-612, 11/24/03 "memo decision for plaintiff." No shareholder authorization was obtained and, and beyond Jerry Icenhower's explanation that they are a group of Nevada investors, no investigation is made into who the shareholders of Howell and Gardner really are. Diaz obtains a copy of the Articles of Incorporation of Howell & Gardner during due diligence which state that prior shareholder authorization is required for a sale of the assets of the company. Diaz's counsel has the Articles of Incorporation translated into Spanish.

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 6 of 10

More Red Flags for Diaz
Diaz purchases the Villa with all furnishings, electronics, and motor vehicles. The truck on the property is registered in Jerry Icenhower's name. The terms of the purchase and sale contract are not negotiated with anyone at Howell & Gardner, and the purchase agreement is not reviewed by anyone at Howell and Gardner, but is merely brought to the closing. There are no written communications whatsoever between Diaz or his lawyer and anyone at Howell & Gardner or any lawyer for Howell & Gardner. Although Craig Kelley signs the Letter of Instruction to the Mexican Bank, Diaz does not bother to contact Craig Kelley, the purported authorized representative of Howell & Gardner, to introduce himself or discuss the terms of the transaction prior to the close.

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 7 of 10

More Red Flags for Diaz
Although Diaz's due diligence has revealed that Peter R.J. Thompson acted as the "local Mexican counsel" in the prior transfer by Jerry Icenhower to Howell & Gardner, Diaz does not inquire of him about the details of the prior transaction between Icenhower and Howell & Gardner. Diaz first meets Craig Kelley on June 7, 2004 in San Diego at the time the purchase and sale contract is signed. Jerry Icenhower is in attendance. Diaz merely exchanges "pleasantries" but otherwise ignores Craig Kelley. A few days prior to the contract signing, Jerry Icenhower hands Diaz a piece of paper with handwriting showing the accounts and entities to whom the purchase consideration is to be paid. That information is inserted into the purchase agreement by Sanchez.

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 8 of 10

More Red Flags for Diaz
Jerry Icenhower directs Diaz to pay the balance of the consideration to Icenhower Invesments ($191,567); Buckeye International Funding, Inc. ($675,000); and Western Financial Assets ($398,000). Howell & Gardner is to receive just $25,000. Diaz does not ask why or ask Craig Kelley for verification. The amounts sent to Buckeye International Funding, Inc., Western Financial Assets, and Icenhower Investments are wired to bank accounts in Visalia, California, not Nevada, where Howell & Gardner and its owners are supposed to be located. Public information on the Nevada Secretary of State web site shows that both Western Financial Assets and Buckeye International Funding have only recently been created and that the resident agent is a nominee officer and director, raising questions as to who is really in control. Public record searches would show "Icenhower Investments" does not exist as a real entity. Icenhower warns Diaz prior to the closing that the bankrutpcy trustee may file a suit against Howell & Gardner and challenge the transaction. Diaz still proceeds.

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 9 of 10

More Red Flags for Diaz
Diaz's due diligence reveals that, although it was a taxable transaction, no taxes were paid by Jerry Icenhower on the transaction for the sale of the Villa to Howell & Gardner and that the stated value of the transaction is the same as the appraised value. Diaz still doesn't ask Howell & Gardner for a copy of the underlying purchase contract to validate the actual terms of that transaction. H&G's (and thus Diaz/Barba's) Mexican tax "problem" is handled by falsifying the purchase price on the contracts and in the deed. Diaz agrees in the purchase agreement to pay half of the seller's capital gains and transfer taxes. Despite the contract, Diaz pays all the seller's capital gains and transfer taxes, because Howell & Gardner has no money. Icenhower suggests to Diaz that the transaction be in cash so it cannot be traced. Diaz agrees to pay a portion of seller's trustee fees. Before closing, he discovers Howell & Gardner is seriously delinquent, ends up paying all.

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-3

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 10 of 10

Despite All These Warnings to Diaz/Barba:
There is no inquiry into the nature of H&G's business There is no inquiry into the identity of H&G's shareholders There is no inquiry into H&G's reputation There is no inquiry made into H&G's capitalization There is no inquiry made into H&G's solvency There is no request made for H&G's audited financials There is no inquiry into what other assets H&G might own There is no request to review the terms of the sale between H&G and Incenhower (purchase contract) There is no attempt to review the pending bankruptcy case proceedings regarding the Icenhowers Diaz/Barba's "due diligence" is limited to a perfunctory title search in Mexico


Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-4

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 1

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 2 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 3 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 4 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 5 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 6 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 7 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 8 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 9 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 10 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 11 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 12 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 13 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 14 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 15 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 16 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 17 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 18 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 19 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 20 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 21 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 22 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 23 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 24 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 25 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 26 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 27 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 28 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 29 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 30 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 31 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 32 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 33 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 34 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 35 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 36 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 37 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 38 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 39 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 40 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 41 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 42 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 43 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 44 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 45 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 46 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 47 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 48 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 49 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 50 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 51 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 52 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 53 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 54 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 55 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 56 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 57 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 58 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 59 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 60 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 61 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 62 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 63 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-5

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 64 of 64

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 1 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 2 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 3 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 4 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 5 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 6 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 7 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 8 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 9 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 10 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 11 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 12 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 13 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 14 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 15 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 16 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 17 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 18 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 19 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 20 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 21 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 22 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 23 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 24 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 25 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 26 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 27 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 28 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 29 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 30 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 31 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 32 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 33 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 34 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 35 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 36 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 37 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 38 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 39 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 40 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 41 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 42 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 43 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 44 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 45 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 46 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 47 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 48 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 49 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 50 of 51

Case 3:08-cv-01446-BTM-BLM

Document 9-6

Filed 08/22/2008

Page 51 of 51