Free Motion to Strike - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF Document 297-2 Filed 07/14/2006 Page1 of 4

Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 297-2 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 2 o]f¥€ 1 OH
J Day
From: JDay
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:48 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'mic|[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
'[email protected]‘; '[email protected]'; SBalick; TLydon
Subject: Power Integrations v. Fairchild Semiconductor
Good afternoon John. We were surprised, a few minutes ago, to see that Power Integrations had filed a reply
letter in support of its motion for reconsideration of the Court's June 2, 2006 Order, since Local Rule 7.1.5 does
not permit a reply on such motions. (indeed, when Power Integrations moved for reconsideration of the Court's
August 9, 2005 Order last year, Power Integrations followed Rule 7.1.5 and did not Hle a reply). Therefore, we
request that you withdraw Power Integrations reply immediately. lf for some reason Power Integrations refuses to
comply with Rule 7.1.5, I would appreciate your letting me know by close of business so that Fairchild can move
to strike it Hrst thing tomorrow morning.
Thanks,
John
7/14/2006

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF Document 297-2 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 3 of 4

Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 297-2 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 4 gfage 1 Ofl
JDay
From: John Horvath [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 5:15 PM
To: JDay
Cc: William Marsden; Sean Hayes; Frank Scherkenbach; Michael Kane; Howard Pollack; David
Miclean; Michael Headley; G. Hop Guy; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; SBalick; TLydon
Subject: RE: Power lntegrations v. Fairchild Semiconductor
John,
We do not interpret Rule 7.1.5 as specifically prohibiting the filing of a reply brief. We therefore do not intend to
withdraw the letter to the Court we filed today. We look fonivard to receiving your motion to strike tomorrow.
Regards,
John F. Howath
Fish & Richardson, P.C.
919 N. Market St., Suite 1100
Wilmington, DE, 19806
Direct: 302-778-8420
Fax: 302-652-0607

From: JDay [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 4:48 PM
To: John Horvath
Cc: William Marsden; Sean Hayes; Frank Scherkenbach; Michael Kane; Howard Pollack; David Miclean; Michael
Headley; G. Hop Guy; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; SBalick;
TLydon
Subject: Power Integrations v. Fairchild Semiconductor
Good afternoon John. We were surprised, a few minutes ago, to see that Power lntegrations had tiled a reply
letter in support of its motion for reconsideration of the Court's June 2, 2006 Order, since Local Rule 7.1.5 does
not permit a reply on such motions. (Indeed, when Power lntegrations moved for reconsideration of the Court's
August 9, 2005 Order last year, Power lntegrations followed Rule 7.1.5 and did not tile a reply). Therefore, we
request that you withdraw Power lntegrations reply immediately. lf for some reason Power lntegrations refuses to
comply with Rule 7.1.5, l would appreciate your letting me know by close of business so that Fairchild can move
to strike it first thing tomorrow morning.
Thanks,
John
7/14/2006