Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF Document 308-2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page1 of 2

Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 308-2 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
FESH Sc RICHARBSON P.C.
$00 Argucllo Srrecr
Sutra goo
Redwood City, Calitorrria
§s§»O(i§~·I§26
lltrzéctick P. Eilslr » » I Y h `
lll ‘”° vm ssosrmrrssx sr U.s.1v.tA11,, §§g“;§,’,§Z§§7.€,
\`¢{l{, Rlclretrclson 65
¤Ss9~t9s¤ Fmlrsile
rtegrsr s, zoos lll g”‘5""
Web Sita:
Bag {lg www.l~r.com
Crrriok, Herrisgtorr ét Sutcliffe LLP Miami R Hmucy
EQQO Marsh Rose {GSO; 35;,-,,39
lvlerzlo Fork, CA 94025
limrril _
Re: Power lrrtegatious lm. v. Fairchild Semleorrouctor lnt’l h°“ll°l@h°°°”°
USDC-D. Del. - CA. No. (}4~l37l·§.lF
® Best Bas:
M I IN l receives your six page letter of yesteréay regarding the derrrsges esse, s letter that
”“”`°’” cloes little more than repeat the roischsrscterizstioos you ltsye set forth before ss part
***·*¤·L·“ of F eirol1ilcl’s continued etlotts to delay the case and to avoltl trial. 'Ylris is 21 patent
:>sr.»~¤—or¤ lrrlringemertt case; to date, neither you mor your expert have ever molested how
NW 2.,,,% ?ower.l11tegr‘z1tiorrs’ restated earnings (which deal with when and how to expense
W, mw O options} will in my way affect the damages reports or opinions. lostosd, Fairchild
mum mm cootimrss to hide behind hyperbole to support at pretense —- tlret Dr. Keeley is unable
to renoer opiséorrs, and that everything he has ever said rides on Power lrrtegretiorsf
TWIN aww restated ezrmirrgs reports. T hat is subterfuge.
\X·'.l\SlllNG`l`GN , QC
Wlrst did impact the damages reports, and what Mr. 'lfroxel has supplemented his
report to reflect, is your clieoss failure to identify over Zi? roilliorr zroeusetl parts
morrulectured in the United States (which you and Mr. VerlclerZs.rrdeo both initially
srlmlttecl were “aecused products"), your olierrfs clepositiozr or Slrewrl Slzrytoo, the
l’l`C infringement decision against System General ("‘SG" - s corrtpsrty wltose
products your expert mentioned), and the reports ot` Mr. Lum, who eorrlirmerl wlrztt
Fsirelrilrl CO*£llLlllll.t`3S to ignore —— that Faircl1ild’s accuses products are imported into the
limited States by Samsung -~ Faireltiltts oiggest customer.
At this point, Fairchild should stop wasting time oo siéeslrows and roses its energy on
tool, as we ples to try this case, including the ciamrages ease, ie eccorémrce with 5"otlge
l"’emse’s orttlers. To that end, we have provided you with is reasonable scrletlrtle to
complete damages discovery in preparation for trial. lt`Fairel1ilrl seeks to prevent us
oem taking Dr. Keeley’s riepositiom, we will ask the Court to preclude Fairchild trom
preseotlrtg any testimony from Dr. Keeley st trial.
Sincerely,
Michael R. llesdle