Case 1 :04-cv-01371-JJF Document 526 Filed O9/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
H\I THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC., )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) C.A. N0. 04-1371-JJF
)
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR )
INTERNATIONAL, INC., and FAIRCHILD )
SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, )
)
Defendants. )
DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
ASHBY & GEDDES
Steven J. Balick (I.D. #21 14)
John G. Day (I.D. #2403)
Lauren E. Maguire (I.D. #4261)
500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
P.O. Box 1 150
Wilmington, DE 19899
302-654-1888
sbalick@ashby—geddes.com
jday@ashby-geddescom
[email protected]
Attorneys for Dej%ndants
Of Counsel:
G. Hopkins Guy, III
Vickie L. Feeman
Bas de Blank
Gabriel M. Ramsey
Orrick, Herrington & Stucliffe LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 614-7400
Dated: September 7, 2007
OHS West:2601163871
10414-25 M2B/M2B
Case 1:O4—cv—O1371-JJF Document 526 Filed O9/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:
Invalidity 0f U.S. Patent N0. 4,811,075
l. Do you find that Claim 1 of the ‘075 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
2. Do you find that Claim 5 of the ‘O75 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
Invalidity of U.S. Patent N0. 6,249,876
3. Do you find that Claim 1 ofthe ‘876 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO†answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
Invalidity of U.S. Patent N0. 6,107,851
4. Do you find that Claim 1 ofthe ‘85l Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO†answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
5. Do you find that Claim 4 of the ‘85 l Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A “NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
Invalidity of U.S. Patent N0. 6,229,366
6. Do you find that Claim 9 of the ‘366 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this question
is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO†answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
7. Do you find that Claim 14 of the ‘366 Patent is invalid? (A "YES" answer to this
question is a finding for Fairchild. A "NO" answer is a finding for Power Integrations.)
YES NO
OHS West:2601 16387.1
10414-25 Mza/Mza
Case 1:O4—cv—O1371-JJF Document 526 Filed O9/07/2007 Page 3 cf 3
You must each sign this Verdict Form: Dated:
(foreperson)
OHS Wcst:260l 16387.1
10414-25 M2B/M212