Free Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 2,296.9 kB
Pages: 28
Date: December 10, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,142 Words, 6,554 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8723/624-4.pdf

Download Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware ( 2,296.9 kB)


Preview Redacted Document - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 1 of 28

Exhibit O

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 2 of 28

REDACTED IN ITS ENTIRETY

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 3 of 28

Exhibit P

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 4 of 28

REDACTED IN ITS ENTIRETY

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 5 of 28

Exhibit Q

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 6 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 7 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 8 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 9 of 28

Exhibit R

Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Document 624-4 Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Filed 12/10/2007

Page Page 10 of 28 1 of 2

Jennifer Pierce
From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Kristina Kim [[email protected]] Friday, December 16, 2005 11:32 AM Michael Headley [email protected]; ??? Fwd: Power Integrations v. Fairchild

Attachments: LG Electronics order.pdf; LG Electronics opinion.pdf; Memorandum Order.pdf
Mike -I am doing a quick e-mail informing you that, pusuant to explanation I received from counsel for Fairchild (forwarded below), Samsung International, Inc. (SII) has not purchased from Fairchild the part items you list in your Subpoena, as further amended in your discovery responses produced to Fairchild in this lawsuit. Also, I confirm that SII has at no time purchased components from System General. Our formal repsonse to the Subpoena will be sent to you during January 2006. Regards,

Kristina Sojung Kim, Esq. General Counsel Samsung International, Inc. Office (619) 671-6011 Fax (619) 671-6010/6013 Cell (619) 384-5685 E-mail: [email protected] THIS EMAIL AND ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE INTENDED SOLELY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE(S). IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, BE ADVISED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS EMAIL IN ERROR, AND WE ASK THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY KRISTINA S. KIM, GENERAL COUNSEL, SAMSUNG INTERNATIONAL, INC., BY TELEPHONE AT (619)384-5685 OR (619) 671-6011.

------- Original Message ------Sender : de Blank, Bas Date : 2005-12-13 15:13 Title : Power Integrations v. Fairchild

Kristina,

It was good to speak with you. As we discussed, while Power Integrations originally accused Fairchild's FSCQ0765 device, in its latest (September 30, 2005) interrogatory response on the subject, Power Integrations has dropped those accusations and no longer accuses the FSCQ0765 device of infringing any of its patents. Thus, whether or not Fairchild sold any of its FSCQ0765 devices to Samsung is not of any relevance to this case. Further, I have attached a copy of the Court's Order precluding Power Integrations from seeking damages related discovery prior to the filing of the complaint. The relevant passage of that Order is on page 6, which states "Accordingly, the Court concludes that Power Integrations has not established that documents related to Fairchild's sales prior to the date of the Complaint are relevant to the question of damages, and therefore, the Court concludes that Power Integrations is not entitled to the discovery of these documents." As the Order notes, the Complaint was filed on October 20, 2004. Thus, Samsung need not produce any sales or other information prior to October 20, 2004. I also attach a copy of the Court's Order quashing an essentially identical subpoena Power Integrations served on LG. I will also send you copies of these orders via facsimile. I hope that this answers all of your questions. I understand that Samsung intends to respond that Samsung has not purchased any accused Fairchild device. If that is not correct or if there is anything else I can do to be of assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Bas de Blank ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 650-614-7343 (phone) 650-614-7401 (fax)
From Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on 12/13/2005 03:14:23 PM IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication, unless expressly stated otherwise, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code

12/3/2007

Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Document 624-4 Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Filed 12/10/2007

Page Page 11 of 28 2 of 2

or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter(s) addressed herein. ====================================================================================================================== NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION. For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com/

12/3/2007

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 12 of 28

Exhibit S

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 13 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 14 of 28

Exhibit T

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 15 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 16 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 17 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 18 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 19 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 20 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 21 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 22 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 23 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 24 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 25 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 26 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 27 of 28

Case 1:04-cv-01371-JJF

Document 624-4

Filed 12/10/2007

Page 28 of 28