Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv—O1373-KAJ Document 236 Filed O3/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
PRICKETT, JONES & ELLIOTT
ri Hyg ircc I A PROFESSIONAL .·\SSOClA'I`lON Over CC;
W (gO2)f1;%8-665):11 1310 K-ING STREET, BOX 1328 ll N(§l'l·l $'l`l{liI·L'l`
\X/ritcr's 'l`elccopyNumb<:r1: WILMINGTON DELAWARE 19899 DO\'l.ilLDl}QLA\X/ARI?] 19901
soz smmi ’ mi.; wz euss
W....$~. 12%M¤11 Add ,cs$ . TED <808> 888-0800 FAX. 802% .7.....23
PMLuk0ff@/prickerncom FAX: (302) 658-8111
http: / / www.prickett.c0m
March 27, 2006
VIA EFILING AND HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States District Court
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
RE: Ampex Corp. v. Eastman Kodak C0., et al.
C.A. N0. 04-1373 gKA,|)
Dear Judge J ordan:
This will explain the efiling today, rather than last Friday, ofthe defense experts' reports.
Having not had the experience of a previous case with you, I interpreted the Scheduling Order to
require only serving on the plaintiff, rather than efiling, expert reports which were due on March
24, 2006. The defendants did, indeed, serve their expert reports on plaintiffs counsel last Friday.
I have efiled Notices of Service of those reports today, reflecting the timely service. I had been
lulled into believing only service was required by virtue of Local Rule 5.4(a), which stipulates
that all Rule 26(a) disclosures [which I construed to include expert reports under Rule
26(a)(2)(B)] are to be served but not filed. Hopefully, this has not caused any inconvenience to
the Court.
Respectfully submitted, {
PAUL M. LUKOFF V
PML/mhl
cc: Clerk, U.S. District Court (By Hand)
Jack B. Bltunenfeld, Esq. (By Hand)
Norman H. Beamer, Esq. (By E-mail)
Jesse J. Jenner, Esq. (By E-mail)
Michael J. Siunmersgill, Esq. (By E-mail)
19660.3\300561vl