Free Order - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 10.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 320 Words, 1,860 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/20660/46.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Colorado ( 10.6 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:03-cv-02321-EWN-MJW

Document 46

Filed 07/30/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 03-cv-02321-EWN-MJW RAYMOND ARTHUR PRICE, Applicant, v. SUPT. REID, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents.

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 AND FED. R. APP. P. 24 Nottingham, Chief Judge Applicant filed pro se on April 2, 2007, a notice of appeal. On April 18, 2007, the court ordered Applicant to cure the deficiencies on appeal by submitting either the filing fee on appeal or a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action. On April 23, 2007, Applicant submitted a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action. The court has examined the motion and the file and finds that the motion is deficient for the following reasons: (A) Filing Fee is not submitted Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24 in a Habeas Corpus Action: is not submitted is missing affidavit is missing required financial information is missing an original signature by the prisoner

(B)

Case 1:03-cv-02321-EWN-MJW

Document 46

Filed 07/30/2007

Page 2 of 2

X

is not on proper form (must use the court's current form) other CERTIFIED TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT NOT SUBMITTED

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the April 23, 2007 motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because the motion is deficient. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 30th day of July, 2007.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Edward W. Nottingham CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO