Free Order on Motion for Leave - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:03-cv-02451-PSF-CBS

Document 29

Filed 08/19/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Phillip S. Figa

Civil Action No. 03-cv-2451-PSF-CBS BRYCE E. CARLEY, Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Utah corporation, Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE

Plaintiff' Motion to Attend the Final Trial Preparation Conference by Telephone s (Dkt. # 28) is DENIED without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, which states: Duty to Confer. The court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule. DATED August 19, 2005. BY THE COURT: s/ Phillip S. Figa ________________________________ Phillip S. Figa United States District Judge

Case 1:03-cv-02451-PSF-CBS

Document 29

Filed 08/19/2005

Page 2 of 2