Free Stipulation for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 12.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 298 Words, 2,062 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/21223/131-2.pdf

Download Stipulation for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado ( 12.4 kB)


Preview Stipulation for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:03-cv-02669-MSK-PAC

Document 131-2

Filed 10/11/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case No. 03-cv-2669-MSK-PAC

LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP. - CALIFORNIA, a Utah corporation; BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Utah corporation; BIG-D CORPORATION, a Utah corporation; BIG-D CAPITAL CORP., a Wyoming corporation; and Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendants/Counterclaimants,

BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP. - CALIFORNIA, a Utah corporation; BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Utah corporation; and Does 1-100, inclusive, Third Party Plaintiffs, v. MARELICH MECHANICAL CO., INC. dba UNIVERSITY MARELICH MECHANICAL, a California corporation, Third Party Defendant.

MARELICH MECHANICAL CO., INC. dba UNIVERSITY MARELICH MECHANICAL, a California corporation, Third Party Plaintiff/Counterclaimant, v. BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP. - CALIFORNIA, a Utah corporation; FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation; FRICK COMPANY, and Roes 20 through 80, inclusive, Counterdefendant/Third Party Defendants.

Case 1:03-cv-02669-MSK-PAC

Document 131-2

Filed 10/11/2005

Page 2 of 2

ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP. TO PROVIDE RESPONSES TO SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the parties' Second Stipulated Motion for Enlargement of Time for Plaintiff and Defendants Big-D Construction Corp. to Provide Responses to Second Set of Interrogatories - and - Certificate of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LR 6.1D and D.C.COLO.LR 7.1A, the Court having reviewed said motion, the file, and now being fully advised in the premises, HEREBY GRANTS the parties' motion. Plaintiff Leprino Foods Company and Defendants Big-D Construction Corp. have to and including October 14, 2005, within which to answer, object or otherwise respond to their respective Second Set of Interrogatories.

DONE AND SIGNED this ____ day of _______________, 2005. BY THE COURT:

U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge

2