Free Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:03-cv-02669-MSK-PAC

Document 185

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 03-cv-02669-MSK-PAC LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP.- CALIFORNIA, a Utah corporation, BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Utah corporation, BIG-D CORPORATION, a Utah corporation, BIG-D CAPITAL CORP., a Wyoming corporation, and Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendants/Counterclaimants

BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP.- CALIFORNIA, a Utah corporation, BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Utah corporation, and Does 1-100, inclusive, Third Party Plaintiffs, v. MARELICH MECHANICAL CO., INC. dbs UNIVERSITY MARELICH MECHANICAL, a California corporation, Third Party Defendant.

MARELICH MECHANICAL CO., INC. dbs UNIVERSITY MARELICH MECHANICAL, a California corporation, Third Party Plaintiff/Counterclaimant, v. BIG-D CONSTRUCTION CORP. - CALIFORNIA, a Utah corporation, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, FRICK COMPANY, and Roes 20 through 80, inclusive, Counterdefendant/Third Party Defendants.

Case 1:03-cv-02669-MSK-PAC

Document 185

Filed 01/17/2006

Page 2 of 2

_________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM MSK PRACTICE STANDARDS FOR RULE 56 MOTION PAGE LIMITATIONS _________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER having come before the Court on Motion of Big-D Construction Corp California and Big-D Construction Corp. for Relief from MSK Practice Standards regarding Rule 56 Motion Page Limitations (#184), the Court, having reviewed said motion and now being fully advised in the premises. HEREBY ORDERS that the motion is granted. Big-D Construction Corp - California and Big-D Construction Corp. may file a brief in response to Plaintiff Leprino Foods Company' s Motion for Summary Adjudication that does not exceed 30 pages. Counsel are reminded that failure to adhere to the format set out in the MSK Practice Standards may delay determination of the matter. DATED this 17th day of January 2006. BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge