Free Scheduling Order - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:04-cv-01417-GMS

Document 38

Filed 04/23/2007

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

: : Plaintiff, : : v. : : FIRST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL : SERVICES, et al., : : Defendants. : __________________________________ : : RICHARD C. HUNT, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : BRIAN EMIG, : : Defendant. :

RICHARD C. HUNT,

Civil Action No. 04-1417-***

Civil Action No. 06-324-***

CONSOLIDATED

SCHEDULING ORDER This 23rd day of April, 2007, the Court having conducted an initial Rule 16 scheduling and planning conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(a) on April 20, 2007, and the parties having determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at this juncture by settlement, voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration; IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard.

Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the parties shall make their initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) within five days of the date of this

Case 1:04-cv-01417-GMS

Document 38

Filed 04/23/2007

Page 2 of 5

Order. If they have not already done so, the parties are to review the Court's Default Standard for Discovery of Electronic Documents, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Orders, etc., Policies & Procedures, Ad Hoc Committee for Electronic Discovery), and is incorporated herein by reference. 2. Joinder of other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to join

other parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings shall be filed on or before June 1, 2007. 3. Discovery a. Location of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,

director, or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this district court must ordinarily be required, upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this district. Exceptions to this general rule may be made by order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a counterclaimant, cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as having filed an action in this Court for the purpose of this provision. b. Discovery Cut Off. All discovery in this case shall be initiated so

that it will be completed on or before November 1, 2007. The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond to contention interrogatories early in the case. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the limitations on discovery set forth in Local Rule 26.1 shall be strictly observed. c. Disclosure of Expert Testimony. Plaintiff's initial Federal Rule

26(a)(2) disclosure of expert testimony is due on or before August 17, 2007. Defendants' supplemental disclosure to contradict or rebut evidence on the same 2

Case 1:04-cv-01417-GMS

Document 38

Filed 04/23/2007

Page 3 of 5

matter identified by another party is due on or before September 20, 2007. Along with the submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall advise of the dates and times of their experts' availability for deposition. To the extent any objection to expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it shall be made by motion no later than the deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. d. Discovery Disputes. Should counsel find they are unable to resolve

a discovery dispute, the party seeking the relief shall contact chambers at (302) 5736173 to schedule a telephone conference. Not less than forty-eight hours prior to the conference, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. (The Court does not seek extensive argument or authorities at this point; it seeks simply a statement of the issue to be addressed and a summary of the basis for the party's position on the issue.) Not less than twenty-four hours prior to the conference, any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining that party's reasons for its opposition. Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion of the telephone conference, the Court will order it. Disputes over protective orders are to be addressed in the first instance in accordance with this paragraph. 4. Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find it will be

necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the disclosure of confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to 3

Case 1:04-cv-01417-GMS

Document 38

Filed 04/23/2007

Page 4 of 5

reach an agreement on a proposed form of order and submit it to the Court within ten days from the date of this Order. Should counsel be unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order, the counsel must first follow the provisions of Paragraph 3e above. Any proposed order should include the following paragraph: Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to preclude another court from finding that information may be relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to disclose another party's information designated "confidential" pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard on whether that information should be disclosed. 5. Papers Filed Under Seal. When filing papers under seal, counsel should

deliver to the Clerk an original and one copy of the papers. 6. conference.. 7. Interim Status Report. On October 2, 2007, plaintiff and defense counsel ADR Process. To be discussed during the Rule 16 scheduling

shall submit a letter to the Court with an interim report on the nature of the matters in issue and the progress of discovery to date. 8. Status Conference. On October 9, 2007, the Court will hold a Rule 16(a),

(b) and (c) conference by telephone with counsel beginning at 9:00 a.m. The State defendants' counsel shall initiate the telephone call. At the time of this conference, plaintiff and counsel shall also be prepared to discuss the progress, if any, of settlement discussions and shall be prepared to discuss the possibility of setting up a settlement 4

Case 1:04-cv-01417-GMS

Document 38

Filed 04/23/2007

Page 5 of 5

conference with the Court, counsel and their clients. If all parties agree that there is nothing to report, nor anything to add to the interim status report or to this order, they shall notify the Court in writing before the conference is scheduled to occur, and the conference will be taken off the Court's calendar. 9. Case Dispositive Motions. All case dispositive motions, an opening brief,

and affidavits, if any, in support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before December 3, 2007. Answering briefs with affidavits, if any, shall be due on or before January 4, 2008. Reply briefs with affidavits, if any, shall be due on or before January 25, 2008. 10. Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any

application to the Court shall be by written motion filed with the Clerk. Unless otherwise requested by the Court, counsel shall not deliver copies of papers or correspondence to Chambers. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement required by Local Rule 7.1.1. Scheduling of the proposed pretrial order, the pretrial conference, and the trial date shall occur after decision is rendered on any case dispositive motions.

/s/ Mary Pat Thynge UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5