Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:O4—cv—O1422-GI\/IS Document 68-2 Filed O3/21/2007 Page1 0f3

§~*‘ 1 :04-cv-O1422-GIV|SSTQE[iEr(jH_1Fii]BE-BA\7\?E[@O3/21/2007 Page-8
A`?) q __V__ { Q {ig, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE J . . if p
: =; . ~ . ·0cT 23 .• a z yr
`$~ . 5 J Q. ` *5 F .
%_/" ‘°'` “1_»§' CARL C. DANBERG ‘ `” `LL _,_,_ Al_.A ________,__Y§@_ _ : ‘
)°"··¤¤·"° Attorney General L 9 OF DE`; A
..--.._.- i. ._,____.__.,_,_,_____,_________j
NEW CASTLE COUNTY KENT COUNTY SUSSEX COUNTY
Carvel State Building ' 102 West Water Street 114 E. Market Street
820 N. French Street Dover, DE 19904 Georgetown, DE 19947
Wilmington, DE 19801 i Criminal Division (302) 739-4211 (302) 856-5352
Criminal Division (302) 577-8500 Fax: (302) 739-6727 Fax: (302) 856-5369
Fax: (302) 577-2496 Civil Division (302) 739-7641 TTY: (302) 856-2500
· Civil Division (302) 577-8400 Fax: (302) 739-7652
Fax: (302) 577-6630 TTY: (302) 739-1545
TTY: (302) 577-5783
October 19, 2006
PLEASE REPLY TO:
[New Castle County—Civil Division]
[ i `i‘· . Gary W. Aber, Esquire » · ( if
` Aber, Goldlust, Baker & Over 1
702 King Street, Suite 600
P.O. Box 1675
Wilmington, DE 19899-1675 .
RE: Hamilton v. Gnessford, et al.
‘ C.A. No. 04-1422 - GMS _ 8
Dear Gary: ‘
I am writing in response to your letter dated October 16, 2006.
First, with respect to Defendants’ document production, Ihave enclosed a table
. p which indicates which documents are responsive to Plaintiffs various discovery requests.
I in Asto a privilege log, the following items are protected from discovery by the
attorney—client privilege and/or work product doctrine:
V 1. March 27, 2003 e—mail from R. McBride to L. Myers regarding J.
I-Iamilton’s sentence history.
2. June 10, 2003 e-mail from G. Smith to R. McBride regarding _
Judge Toliver order.
3. October 2, 2003 e-mail from G. Smith to R. McBride regarding
Supreme Court decision.
With respect to your responses to Defendants’ discovery requests, please provide
me with the type of information which is set forth in this letter. Please identify which
doctunents are responsive to the individual requests and provide me with a privilege log.
I also note that I never received Plaintiff s Initial Disclosures, which were due
September 29, 2006.

Case 1:O4—cv—O1422-GI\/IS Document 68-2 Filed O3/21/2007 Page 3 of 3
Gary W. Aber, Esquire A
October 19, 2006
Page Two
Finally, by letter dated September 27, 2006, I sent you a medical authorization
and a Social Security Administration authorization for Mr. I-Iamilton’s signature. To _
date, you have not returned the signed authorizations to me. Please do so at your earliest
convenience. _
Thank you.
Sincerely, .
{»· It Eileen Kelly -
* - Enclosure Deputy Attorney General ~