Free Proposed Jury Instructions - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 29.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: March 30, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 487 Words, 2,828 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/23819/1096-9.pdf

Download Proposed Jury Instructions - District Court of Colorado ( 29.7 kB)


Preview Proposed Jury Instructions - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cr-00103-REB-MEH

Document 1096-9

Filed 03/30/2007

Page 1 of 2

INSTRUCTION NO. G-8 CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES I remind you that it is your job to decide whether the government has proved the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. In doing so, you must consider all of the evidence. This does not mean, however, that you must accept all of the evidence as true or accurate. You are the sole judges of the credibility or "believability" of each witness and the weight to be given to the witness's testimony. An important part of your job will be making judgments about the testimony of the witnesses [including the defendant] who testified in this case. You should think about the testimony of each witness you have heard and decide whether you believe all or any part of what each witness had to say, and how important that testimony was. In making that decision, I suggest that you ask yourself a few questions: Did the witness impress you as honest? Did the witness have any particular reason not to tell the truth? Did the witness have a personal interest in the outcome in this case? Did the witness have any relationship with either the government or the defense? Did the witness seem to have a good memory? Did the witness clearly see or hear the things about which he/she testified? Did the witness have the opportunity and ability to understand the questions clearly and answer them directly? Did the witness's testimony differ from the testimony of other witnesses? When weighing the conflicting testimony, you should consider whether the discrepancy has to do with a material fact or with an unimportant detail. And you should keep in mind that innocent misrecollection--like failure of recollection--is not uncommon. [The testimony of the defendant should be weighed and his credibility evaluated in the same way as that of any other witness.] [The defendant did not testify and I remind you that you cannot consider his decision not to testify as evidence of guilt. I want you to clearly understand, please, that the Constitution of the United States grants to a defendant the right to remain silent. That

Case 1:04-cr-00103-REB-MEH

Document 1096-9

Filed 03/30/2007

Page 2 of 2

means the right not to testify or call any witnesses. That is a constitutional right in this country, it is very carefully guarded, and you should understand that no presumption of guilt may be raised and no inference of any kind may be drawn from the fact that a defendant does not take the witness stand and testify or call any witnesses.] In reaching a conclusion on particular point, or ultimately in reaching a verdict in this case, do not make any decisions simply because there were more witnesses on one side than on the other.

Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions (Tenth Circuit), No. 1.08 (2005).

2