Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 107.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 775 Words, 4,971 Characters
Page Size: 614 x 790 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8795/98.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 107.4 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1 :04-cv-01443-GMS Document 98 Filed O2/24/2006 Page 1 of 2
YOUNG CoNAwAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
§§E%?%L§¥;;“°*" ¥Li;*;§?£a.§§£*“ THE BI<-ANDYWINE BUILDING ;&"er;;§T‘§.i.$ °EL* °“L°$ 1?S%;$r5é?ii;.m.
SI~TELDo>: SANDLER NEILLIMULLEY WALSH 1000 WEST STREET 17TH FLOOR SEAN M. BEACH MATTHEW B. Lum:
RICRLARD A. LEYINE JANET Z. CHARLTON ’ DONALD J. BDYYMAN. Jl JosEI>II A. MALEITAND
RICIIARD A. ZAI>I=A ROBERT S. BRADY WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801 TI:tIoTI~IY P. CATRYS GLENN C. MASDALAS
FREDERICK W. Iossr JDEL A. XVAITE CURTIS J. CRowTI-IER ADRIA B. I\‘lARTlNELLl
RICILARD H. MORSE BRENT C. SIHAFFER P.O. Box 391 ;{.~\RCg\RET M. DIBIABCA ETICHAEL vi; MFDEKNIOTT
D. I C. M B D. YIEL P. omssox . . Y Dw. Ros t’.·\R.lBETH .. INELLA
JOELEI M. NSCHDILEON CQAJG D. GREAR \Vu“MH\GTO:\’ DELA“ ARE 19899*0391 KENNETH; ENOS EDMON L. MORTON
CRAIG A. KARSNITZ TIMDTI-IY JAY HousEAL (307) 5716600 Im S. FREDERICRS D. For: MUITAALARA-NVALRER
BARRY M. WILLOUGHBY BRENDAN LINEI~IAN SI~LAxx0t< T JAMES J. GALLAGHER JENNIFER R. NOEL
JosY W. INGERSOLL MARTIS S. LESSNER (800) 253-2234 (DE ONLY) DANIELLE GIBBS Jomx J. PASCHETTO
ANTHONY G. FLYNS PAIJLINE K MDRGAY FAX; (302) 5-yT_T 253 ALISON GM. GOODMAN ADAM W. POFF
JEROME K. GRossMAx C. BARR FLINN SEAN T. GREECIIER SETII J. REIDEREERG
IME? °‘*"i“t‘° i“$‘3L§’$$R ‘—"_ §§;1iJ{2`£‘¥Y°li2A $lT駧FE’;3§§§§Ei
Rgriiilzr L. ri-i—bIIAsR. W. SH.·\\A`4 A I 10 WEST PNEFTREET DAM: M. JONES I I MICHAEL P. STAFFORD
WILLIAM D. JOHNSTON JAMES P. HI;GI~IEs. JR. P.O. Box 594 RICILARD S. JULIE Jorm E. TRACEY
TIr»IoTI~IY J. SNYDER EDWIN J. HARRDN GEORGE-T-OwN_ DELAWARE Tggr;7 KAREx E. KELLER MARGARET B. WIIITEAIAS
BRUCE L. SILYERSTEIN MICIIAEL R. NESTOR 7 _ , JENNIFER M. KINKUS CHRISTIAN DOUGLAS WRIGHT
WILLIAM w. Bowsra MAUREEN D. LUKE (30-) 8>6·3¤7l EDWARD J. KOSNlO\\'SKI sI~iARo>: M. me
LARRY J. TARABICDS ROLIN P. BISSELL (SOO) 255-2234 (DE ONLY)
R .D L ,JR. SCOTl'.·\. H LT __ .
$iL;i;§RTO JoI~IN T. DOg$EY FAX (302) *>6·9338 SPECIAL CDLNSEL BOF COUNSEL
. .R M.B.’C ‘ . .. . , J .· A L.= .‘,J. S I. .Y
“*“*`”“**' GBM LM tm -:w-¤r¤¤~¤¤<>~AwA~-¤<>~I E‘li§§EC.f0£&i$¥§Y‘Z»Nr.·, EEESEB. §I;.`<$I’ELL..2ND
PATRICIA A. YJVIDDOSS
DIRECT DIAL: (302) 571-6713
DIRECT FAY: (302) 576-3515
[email protected]
February 24, 2006
BY E-FILE AND HAND DELIVERY
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
844 King Street
Wilmington, DE l980l
Re: National Stczrclz and Chemical Izzvestnzent Holding Corp.,
et al. v. Cargill, [nc., et al. C.A. No. 04-1443-GMS
Dear Judge Sleet:
I write on behalf of plaintiffs National Starch and Chemical Investment Holding Corp,
Penford Australia Ltd., and Penford Holdings PTY (collectively "Plaintiffs") to set forth the ·
agenda for the discovery teleconference set for February 28, 2005 at 10:00 AM. The
disagreement between the parties to be presented to the Court concerns the following issues:
(I) Impact on Discovery of Defendants Motion to Amend the Pleadings,
which was filed on February l, 2006;
(2) Defendants responses to Plaintiffs Interrogatories Nos. I3, 15-21;
(3) Plaintiffs have three other issues, which are described below, which we
believe are ripe for presentation. However, defendants’ disagree as to whether there has
been an adequate meet and confer regarding these issues. We identify these issues only
in the event Your Honor is willing to hear them at the teleconference; if not we will
endeavor to present them at a future conference.
DBOI:1S39268.1 0635411001

Case 1:04-cv-O1443—Gl\/IS Document 98 Filed O2/24/2006 Page 2 of 2
Youric CoNAwAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet
February 24, 2006
Page 2
(a) Potential effect on fact and expert discovery of defendants’ recent
document production, including production of over 800 pages of documents on
February 22, 2006;
` (b) The January 6, 2006 date for defendants’ to elect whether to rely
on advice of counsel in defense of the willful infringement allegation and the
January 13, 2006 date by which they must produce their opinions of counsel if
they are so relying;
(c) Defendants objections and privilege assertions during depositions;
Defendants’ List of Topics:
(l) Plaintiffs’ Failure To Produce Teresa Capitani’s EPO Declarations And
Related Documents Prior To Her Deposition.
(2) Plaintiffs’ Failure To Produce Seed Samples Promised During The Prior
Teleconference And By Letter Dated January 27, 2006.
Respectfully Submitted,
Monte T. Squire (No. 4764)
MTS:aaw
cc: John W. Shaw, Esquire
Thomas Halkowski, Esquire
DB0l:l839268.l 063541.100l