Free Brief in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:04-cv-00560-OES-BNB

Document 70-2

Filed 10/20/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO GEORGE M. BULL, Plaintiff, vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant. AFFIDAVIT OF KEITH E. EKSTROM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING THE "STANDISH CORRESPONDENCE" STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ) ss. ) Civil Action No.: 04-ES-0560 (BNB)

I, Keith E. Ekstrom, being duly sworn on oath, depose and state: 1. I am one of the attorneys representing plaintiff George Bull in the above-captioned matter, and am licensed to practice in the courts of Minnesota. On January 14, 2005, I was admitted to practice before U.S. District Court of Colorado. 2. Attached hereto are true and correct copies of the following: Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D. Exhibit E. Exhibit F. Pietruszynski Deposition, pp. 115, 116 and 121; Order granting plaintiff's motion to compel in Vogt v. Union Pacific, Denver District Court; May 10, 2004 e-mail from Goulet to Hanks at Union Pacific (Bates #2876); Johanning Deposition, pp. 38-39; May 4, 1004 memo from G. Pietruszynski (Bates #2863); Report of William Muzzy, pp. 9-11.

FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

/s Keith E. Ekstrom Keith E. Ekstrom

Case 1:04-cv-00560-OES-BNB

Document 70-2

Filed 10/20/2005

Page 2 of 2

Subscribed and sworn to before me this _____ day of October, 2005.

/s R. S. Martinson Notary Public

-2-