Free Status Report - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 10.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 373 Words, 2,457 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/25598/30.pdf

Download Status Report - District Court of Colorado ( 10.2 kB)


Preview Status Report - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-00680-REB-CBS

Document 30

Filed 07/20/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. No. 04-cv-00680-REB-CBS DONALD KELLER, Plaintiff, v. QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC., QWEST ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND JOHN DOES 1-15, Defendants. JOINT STATUS REPORT Pursuant to this Court's Minute Order dated June 30, 2006, Plaintiff and Defendants (the "Parties") submit this Joint Status Report. 1. On February 23, 2005, the Court entered an order designating this action a

"Coordinated Qwest Action" under the Order Providing For Coordinated Discovery With Parallel Qwest Litigation (the "Discovery Coordination Order") previously entered in In re Qwest Communications International, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 01-cv-01451REB-PAC (the "Securities Class Action"). Accordingly, discovery in this action is coordinated with discovery in, inter alia, the Securities Class Action and In re Qwest Savings and Investment Plan ERISA Litigation (the "ERISA Class Action"). Discovery has proceeded in the Securities Class Action and in the ERISA Class Action. The Parties understand that depositions of many additional witnesses who might otherwise be deposed under the Discovery Coordination Order have been stayed at the request of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado.

Case 1:04-cv-00680-REB-CBS

Document 30

Filed 07/20/2006

Page 2 of 2

2.

The Parties have conferred regarding settlement of the instant action, and in that

process have informally exchanged documents and other information. There is no separate scheduling order for this action. Neither Party has provided expert disclosures. The Parties anticipate the need for some limited additional discovery, the extent of which will likely be determined by the discovery that occurs pursuant to the Discovery Coordination Order. At a minimum, the Parties anticipate the need for written discovery and Defendants will likely depose Plaintiff. There is no trial date. Dated this 20th day of July, 2006.

s/ Perry J. Schneider Perry J. Schneider, Esq. MILODRAGOVICH, DALE, STEINBRENNER & BINNEY, P.C. P.O. Box 4947 Missoula, MT 59806-4947

s/ Michael B. Carroll William T. Hankinson, Esq. William A. Wright, Esq. Michael B. Carroll, Esq. SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C. D.C. Box 12 633 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3000 Denver, Colorado 80202 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

2