Free Exhibit List - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 04-WM-0761 (BNB)

DEAN COLBY, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation Defendant.

DEFENDANT=S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF=S SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST

Defendant, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as AProgressive@), through its attorneys, Seaman, Giometti & Murphy, P.C., hereby submit its Objections to Plaintiff=s Supplemental Exhibit List pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a)(3) as follows:

Exhibit

Description

Offer

Stip

In

Out

Rul. Res .

Objection

1. 2.

Complaint and Jury Demand Transcription of Audiotape of Testimony Re H.B. 92-1175 H.B. 92-1175 and H.B. 92-1176

Objection - relevance Objection - relevance, hearsay

3.

Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 2 of 8

and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay 4. ' 10-4-706, Colo. Rev. Stat. (2002) Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - what the

5.

' 10-4-710, Colo. Rev. Stat. (2002)

6.

Aetna v. McMichael

7.

Thompson v. Budget Rent-ACar

8.

Brennan v. Farmers Alliance

9.

Clark v. State Farm

10.

Fincher v. Prudential

11.

Peterson v. Home

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 3 of 8

Ins. Co. of Indiana

law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial), hearsay Objection - relevance, hearsay, 403 (unfairly prejudicial)

12.

Midwest Mut. Ins. Co. Market Conduct Examination Report (selected pages), and Final Agency Order Atlanta Cas. Ins. Co. Market Conduct Examination Report (selected pages), and Final Agency Order Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. Market Conduct Examination Report (selected pages), and Final Agency Order Colo. Div. of Ins. correspondence Letter from Duke Daugherty to Div. of Ins. dated 8/30/91, with forms attached Letter from Duke Daugherty to Div. of Ins. dated 10/29/91, with forms attached, 10/31/91 Letter from

13.

Objection - relevance, hearsay, 403 (unfairly prejudicial)

14.

Objection - relevance, hearsay, 403 (unfairly prejudicial)

15. 16.

Objection - relevance Objection - relevance

17.

Objection - relevance

18.

Objection - relevance

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 4 of 8

Jeffrey Adler to Div. of Ins. dated 6/26/92, with forms attached 19. 20. Form No. L0006 (12-92) American Family Reformation letter and Questionnaire Progressive Mtn. Ins. Co. Automobile Insurance Policy issued to Thomas C. Sumners, Jr. certified copy, Bates Nos. 00021-00043 Progressive PIP Disclosure and Selection Form, Form No. 278 CO, all versions Progressive Form No. 5595 (06-94), Colby/Agnt 0000115 Progressive Form No. 7778 (1-94), Colby/Agnt 00014 Progressive Colorado Automobile Application dated 1/25/91, Colby/Agnt 000150-151 Objection - relevance Objection - relevance, hearsay

21.

No objection

22.

Objection - relevance

23.

Objection - relevance

24.

Objection - relevance

25.

No objection

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 5 of 8

26.

Div. of Ins. filings pertaining to Progressive Mtn. Ins. Co. and Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. Traffic Accident Report Application for PIP Benefits Progressive PIP Payment Record, Colby/CL 000592-598 Progressive General Underwriting Rules, Colby/Rte 000004-7, 000046-47 Answer and Jury Demand Dep. Tr. of Dean Colby Dep. Tr. of Thomas C. Sumners, Jr. Affidavit of Debra Henry dated 8/5/04 Affidavit of Heather Miller with StaileyParker Agency file attached Affidavit of Terri Daugherty, dated

Objection - relevance, lack of foundation (authenticity)

27. 28. 29.

No objection No objection No objection

30.

No objection

31. 32. 33.

Objection - relevance Objection - relevance, hearsay Objection - relevance, hearsay No objection

34.

35.

No objection

36.

No objection

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 6 of 8

8/11/04, with attachment 37. Affidavit of Michael Hanerty, dated 4/14/05, with attachments Stapish v. Prudential, D. Colo. 03RB718, Order Concerning Motions for Summ. J., dated 3/7/05 Plaintiff=s Discovery Responses Craig Hospital medical records All medical records and billing statements from the health care providers listed in Plaintiff=s Witness List All income documentation pertaining to Dean Colby All filings in Colby v. Progressive, Denver County Dist. Court 93CV4167 All filings in Colby v. Sumners, 93CV62 No objection

38.

Objection - what the law is is for the court to decide. Relevance and 403 (unfairly prejudicial)

39.

Objection - relevance, hearsay Objection - relevance Objection - relevance

40. 41.

42.

Objection - relevance

43.

No objection

44.

Objection - relevance

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 7 of 8

Respectfully submitted this 28th day of July, 2005.

S/ Gregory R. Giometti _______________________________ Gregory R. Giometti, Esq. Seaman, Giometti & Murphy, P.C. 7730 E. Belleview Avenue, Suite 102 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Telephone: (303) 771-2111 Fax: (303) 796-0899 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Progressive Mountain Insurance Company

Case 1:04-cv-00761-WDM-BNB

Document 73

Filed 07/28/2005

Page 8 of 8

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 28th day of July, 2005, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing DEFENDANT=S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF=S SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST was filed electronically and via U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed to: Robert B. Carey, Esq. Julie Cliff, Esq. THE CAREY LAW FIRM 2301 East Pikes Peak Avenue Colorado Springs, CO 80909 s/ Sherry J. Cook

8