Free Transcript Order Form - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:00-cv-02325-MSK-MEH Document 358 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 2 AMENDED TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM - DIRECTIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE
PART I - To be completed by appellant within ten days of filing the notice of appeal Short Title: Sierra Club et al. v. Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Co. et al. District: D. Colorado District Court Number: 00-cv-2325-MSK-MEH; 01-cv-2107 Circuit Court Number: 07-1034 Name of Attorney: Jeffrey C. Parsons Name of Law Firm: Western Mining Action Project Address of Firm: P.O. Box 349, Lyons, CO 80540 Telephone of Firm: 303-823-5738 Attorneys for: Appellants Name of Court Reporter: Paul Zuckerman Telephone of Reporter: 303-629-9285 PART II - COMPLETE SECTION A OR SECTION B SECTION A - I HAVE NOT ORDERED A TRANSCRIPT BECAUSE [] A transcript is not necessary for this appeal, or [X] The necessary transcript is already on file in District Court ­ SEE ATTACHED [] The necessary transcript was ordered previously in appeal number _____________________________________________ SECTION B - I HEREBY ORDER THE FOLLOWING TRANSCRIPT: (Specify the date and proceeding in the space below) Voir dire:____________________________; Opening Statements:__________________________________; Trial proceedings: All trial proceedings; (Trial dates: Feb. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 2006). Rule 702 Expert hearings: Ken Klco (June 3, 2005, hearing only); Robert Burm, Sept. 27, 2005, October 27 & 28, 2005 (both hearings and argument). Instruction Cnf:______________________________; Jury Instructions: ___________________________; Closing Arguments: __________________________; _______. Post Trial Motions: __________________________; Other Proceedings: (Attach additional pages if necessary) [X] Appellant will pay the cost of the transcript. My signature on this form is my agreement to pay for the transcript ordered on this form. [] This case is proceeding under the Criminal Justice Act. NOTE: Leave to proceed in forma pauperis does not entitle appellant to a free transcript. An order of the district court allowing payment for the transcript at government expense must be obtained. See 28 U.S.C. §753(f). CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify that I have read the instructions on the reverse of this form and that copies of this transcript order form have been served on the court reporter (if transcript ordered), the Clerk of U.S. District Court, all counsel of record or pro se parties, and the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. I further certify that satisfactory arrangements for payment for any transcript ordered have been made with the court reporter(s). Signature of Attorney/Pro Se: ___________________________________ Date: ____________________ PART III - TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COURT REPORTER Upon completion, please file one copy with the Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals and one copy with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court. Date arrangements for payment completed: ________________________ Estimated completion date: _______________________ Estimated number of pages: ______________________ I certify that I have read the instructions on the reverse side and that adequate arrangements for payment have been made. Signature of Court Reporter: ___________________________________ Date:____________________
TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM

Case 1:00-cv-02325-MSK-MEH

Document 358

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT TO TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM (AMENDED 2-12-07)

All of the district court's Rule 702 hearing transcripts are on file with the district court. Note: Appellants have copies of the August 24, 2005 Rule 702 hearing and order concerning the admissibility of the expert opinions of Dr. Ann Maest, and only the order on concerning those of Ken Klco (June 3, 3005). Appellants would like copies of the Klco hearing from June 3, 2005, and the hearings and legal argument concerning the expert opinions of Robert Burm (September 27, 2005; October 27, 2005; October 28, 2005). Appellants Hereby Order a complete copy of all of the district court trial proceedings (Feb. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 2006). Therefore, it is Appellants' intent that the complete record of all the trial proceedings and all of the Rule 702 proceedings be before the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.