Free Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:00-cv-02098-REB-MJW

Document 228

Filed 07/19/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Robert E. Blackburn, Judge Civil Case No. 00-cv-02098-REB-MJW KELLY FINCHER, by her guardian JAMES FINCHER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER1

The matter before the court is Defendant's Motion for Leave To Exceed the Page Limitations of REB Civ. Practice Standard V.H. 3.a. [sic] in Order To File New Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [#210] filed March 9, 2007. Plaintiffs object. See plaintiffs' opposition [#216] filed March 16, 2007. For the reasons stated, arguments advanced, and authorities cited by defendant in its motion and reply (see [#218] filed March 23, 2007), the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendant's Motion for Leave To Exceed the Page Limitations of REB Civ. Practice Standard V.H.3.a. [sic] in Order To File New Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [#210] filed March 9, 2007, IS GRANTED; 2. That Defendant's Motion For Partial Summary Judgment [#211], which was presented for filing March 9, 2007, IS ACCEPTED for filing; 3. That defendant's Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion For Partial Summary Judgment [#212], which was presented for filing March 9, 2007, IS ACCEPTED for filing; 4. That REB Civ. Practice Standard V.H.4.a. IS WAIVED to facilitate the filing and marshaling of defendant's motion;

This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado.

1

Case 1:00-cv-02098-REB-MJW

Document 228

Filed 07/19/2007

Page 2 of 2

5. That a response and reply MAY BE FILED in the time and manner prescribed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C and REB Civ. Practice Standard V.H.4.a.2 Dated: July 19, 2007

Plaintiffs are not limited to their initial response, [#216] filed March 16, 2007. Instead, the plaintiffs may file another response, which is subject to REB Civ. Practice Standard V.H.4.a.

2

-2-