Free Order - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 9.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 354 Words, 2,211 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/6367/3405.pdf

Download Order - District Court of Colorado ( 9.7 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:01-cr-00214-WYD

Document 3405

Filed 12/20/2006

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Criminal Case No. 01-CR-214-D UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ALVIN GREEN, et al. Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Alvin Green' request for an s extension of time in which to file his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (docket #3403). Defendant states that he believes his petition for a writ of certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court on or about February 21, 2006. On September 17, 2006, Defendant filed a letter with this Court requesting that I " reinstate"him a full year to file his § 2255 motion " of this date"or Order his attorneys to send him a copy as of his discovery and transcripts. In support of his pending request for extension, Defendant states that his deadline to file his § 2255 is " swiftly approaching"and that he is " in need of the full year." still Congress has expressly limited the time in which a prisoner can bring a § 2255 motion to one year after his conviction becomes final, and any extension of this time period contravenes Congress' clear intent to accelerate the federal habeas process. See Washington v. United States, 221 F.3d 1354 (10th Cir. 2000). Judicial intervention

Case 1:01-cr-00214-WYD

Document 3405

Filed 12/20/2006

Page 2 of 2

is justified only under " extraordinary"or " rare and exceptional"circumstances. Id. Defendant has not demonstrated such circumstances. While he intimates that he has not yet obtained transcripts and discovery, he does not describe any effort on his part to obtain such documents. Defendant has not filed a motion for appointment of counsel. In addition, Defendant has not explained what issues he intends to raise in his § 2255 motion, or why progress on preparation of that motion has been delayed. Accordingly, Defendant' request for extension of time to file his § 2255 motion s is DENIED.

Dated: December 20, 2006 BY THE COURT:

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel U. S. District Judge

-2-