Free Sealed Document - District Court of Colorado - Colorado

Case 1:00-cr-00515-WYD

Document 124

Filed 04/19/2006

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO U. S. A. vs. Lamar Blackwell Docket Number: 00-cr-00515-WYD Petition on Supervised Release COMES NOW, Kurt Pierpont, probation officer of the court, presenting an official report upon the conduct and attitude of Lamar Blackwell who was placed on supervision by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel sitting in the court at Denver, Colorado, on the 12th day of June, 2003, who fixed the period of supervision at three (3) years, and imposed the general terms and conditions theretofore adopted by the court and also imposed special conditions and terms as follows: 1. The defendant shall participate in a program of testing and treatment for drug abuse, as directed by the probation officer, until such time as the defendant is released from the program by the probation officer. The defendant shall abstain from the use of alcohol or other intoxicants during the course of treatment. The defendant will be required to pay the cost of treatment as directed by the probation officer.

RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT FOR CAUSE AS FOLLOWS:
(If short insert here: if lengthy write on separate sheet and attach)

See attachment hereto and herein incorporated by reference.

PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER the issuance of a warrant for violations of supervised release and that the petition and warrant be sealed until the arrest of the defendant. ORDER OF THE COURT Considered and ordered this 19th day of April, 2006, and ordered filed under seal and made a part of the record in the above case. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. S/ Kurt Pierpont Kurt Pierpont Senior U.S. Probation Officer

s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel U.S. District Judge Place: Denver, Colorado Date: April 17, 2006

Case 1:00-cr-00515-WYD

Document 124

Filed 04/19/2006

Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT

Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference is a true copy of the Conditions of Supervised Release signed by the defendant on March 10, 2005. His signature on this occasion acknowledged that the conditions had been read and explained to him, that he fully understood said conditions, and that he was provided with a copy of them. The term of supervised release commenced July 1, 2005. The defendant has committed the following violations of supervised release: 1. VIOLATION OF THE LAW:

On or about April 5, 2006, the defendant committed Murder in the First Degree (F-1); Assault in the First Degree (F-3); Two Counts of Vehicular Eluding (F-5); and Two Counts of Possession of a Weapon by Previous Offender (F-6), in violation of Colorado Revised Statutes 18-3-102(1)(a); 18-3-202(1)(a); 18-9-116.5; 18-12-108(1), respectively, which constitutes Grade A and B violations of supervised release. This charge is based on the following facts: On or about April 5, 2006, the defendant was implicated in a homicide which occurred near 16 th and Welton Streets, Denver, CO. On April 12, 2006, Case No. 06-CR-2163 was filed in the Denver County Court charging the defendant with Murder in the First Degree; Assault in the First Degree; Two Counts of Vehicular Eluding; and Two Counts of Possession of a Weapon by Previous Offender. The defendant is currently in state custody pending disposition of these charges. Denver Police Department Homicide Detective Joel Humphry told me that the defendant was engaged in an unprovoked dispute with a patron of the Club Beyond bar in Denver, followed this patron/victim across the street, and fired multiple gunshots into the victim (Jerome Louis Martin). 2. POSSESSION AND USE OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE:

On or about March 14, 2006, the defendant used or administered a controlled substance, cocaine, which had not been prescribed for him by a physician, which constitutes a Grade C violation of supervised release.. This charge is based on the following facts: On or about March 14, 2006, the defendant submitted a random urine specimen at Addiction Research Treatment Services (ARTS), which was subsequently tested at the Kroll Laboratory, with results testing positive for cocaine metabolite. I confronted defendant with this positive urine specimen March 24, 2006. Defendant said he was in the presence of another person who was smoking crack cocaine.