Free Motion to Compel - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv—01538-SLR Document 43-3 Filed 07/18/2005 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

HEIDT VASCEK., individually and as :
Administratrix of the ESTATE OF :
JOHN VASCEK, JR., :
Plaintiffs, :
: C.A. No. 94-1538
vs. :
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and
MARK BARD, :
Defendants. :

ORDER
ON THE DAY OF JULY, 2005, this matter coming to be heard on
Plaintiti`s Motion to Compel Defendant, Mark Bard’s Answers to Plaintiffs Written
interrogatories, due notice having been given, ali parties having responded, the Court
having jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter, the Court having been fully
advised in the premises:
THE COURT HEREBY FINDS: that the answers provided by Mr. Bard’s
attorney do not conform to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33, in that they were not the
verbatim, verified answers • Mr. Bard himself, but were sunnnaries or redrafts of
answers by his attorney;
THE COURT FURTHER FINDS: that the redrafted answers of counsel to the
following interrogatories were not responsive or complete: 7(b), 8, I0, ll., 12, l3, l4(a),
E5, l"/(b), 18, 24(a··b), 25, 26, 31, 36, 37, 42, 44, 45 and 46;
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Mr. Bard provide his own ful} and complete
veriiied answers to Plaintiffs Intenrogatories in accordance with the Court’s above
findings within 14 days or face appropriate sanctions upon appiication to the Court.
UNETED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: