Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ____________________________________ ASTORIA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 95-468C (Judge Thomas C. Wheeler)
DEFENDANT'S CORRECTED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AT TRIAL Defendant, the United States, respectfully requests leave to present at trial the deposition testimony designated below of Henry Drewitz, Andrew Kane, Jr., and Christopher Quackenbush obtained during the fact discovery period in this case. We seek leave to submit these deposition passages because Messrs. Drewitz, Kane, and Quackenbush are deceased and the subject matter of their testimony concerns important and relevant information concerning the damage claims of plaintiff, Astoria Federal Savings and Loan Association ("Astoria"). A. The Designations From The Testimony Of Henry Drewitz Mr. Drewitz was the president of Astoria from 1974 until 1989, and he was chairman of its board from 1975 until 1997. We request leave to present the following testimony from Mr. Drewitz obtained in this case on May 23, 2000: 3:7-10; 7:3-8; 8:21-25; 11:19-12:5; 13:1315; 21:10-24:11; 24:19-25:8; 29:11-18; 54:13-17; 62:4-64:7; 73:6-75:19; 86:4-6; 90:4-91:15; 92:6-93:15; 96:2-19; 98:7-17; 99:25-102:3; 107:8-108:20; 110:22-111:10; 112:19-113:13; 116:2-
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 2 of 4
11; 116:23-118:12; 122:12-123:15; 139:15-21. We have annexed these transcript designations as Exhibit A. B. The Designations From The Testimony Of Andrew Kane Mr. Kane was the chairman of the board and chief executive officer of Suburbia Federal Savings and Loan Association at the time of its acquisition by Fidelity, New York, FA ("Fidelity") in 1984. We request leave to present the following testimony from Mr. Kane obtained in this case on July 27, 2000: 9:3-10:1; 11:4-23; 16:11-17:17; 18:20-20:2; 20:11-21:8; 21:25-22:17; 24:17-25:13; 33:16-35:3; 35:8-19; 40:16-41:25; 48:12-49:7; 49:23-50:12; 51:1952:3; 52:21-54:4; 56:20-57:15; 59:6-18; 64:2-13; 64:20-66:9; 79:24-80:17; 82:6-16; 83:13-21; 89:2-9; 91:14-94:15; 97:20-99:12; 100:16-101:9; 105:22-106:9; 107:20-108:5; 109:16-110:7; 113:21-24; 114:13-16; 114:23-115:17. We have annexed these transcript designations as Exhibit B. C. The Designations From The Testimony Of Christopher Quackenbush Mr. Quackenbush was a partner at the investment banking firm, Sandler O'Neill and Partners, and he advised Astoria with respect to its acquisition of Fidelity. We request leave to present the following testimony from Mr. Quackenbush obtained in this case on August 7, 2000: 9:18-10:21; 12:12-13:20 15:22-16:5; 16:14-25; 17:16-20:6; 20:23-21:11; 24:7-19; 28:6-29:8; 40:7-21; 41:1-16; 43:10-13; 64:12-17; 64:25-65:11; 68:2-69:14; 69:20-70:15; 70:19-71:3; 77:2479:4. We have annexed these transcript designations as Exhibit C. Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL F. HERTZ Deputy Assistant Attorney General
-2-
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 3 of 4
JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director
/s/ Kenneth M. Dintzer KENNETH M. DINTZER Assistant Director
OF COUNSEL: ARLENE PIANKO GRONER ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI JOHN J. TODOR SAMEER YERAWADEKAR
/s/ John H. Roberson JOHN H. ROBERSON Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit, 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel. (202) 353-7972 Fax (202) 514-8640 Attorneys for Defendant
March 28, 2007
-3-
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 28th day of March 2007, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AT TRIAL" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.
/s/ John H. Roberson John H. Roberson
-4-
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 1 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 2 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 3 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 4 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 5 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 6 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 7 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 8 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 9 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 10 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 11 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 12 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 13 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 14 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 15 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 16 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 17 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 18 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 19 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 20 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 21 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 22 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 23 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 24 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 25 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 26 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 27 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 28 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 29 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 30 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 31 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 32 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 33 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 34 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 35 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 36 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 37 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 38 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 39 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 40 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 41 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 42 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-2
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 43 of 43
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 1 of 54
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF'FEDERAL CLAIMS NO. 95-468C (Senior Judge Loren A. Smith)
ASTORIA FEDERAL SAVINGS &.LOAN ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, vs. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.
/
DEPOSITION OF ANDREW KANE, JR. Taken before Kerry A. Serey, Registered Professional Reporter, Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, pursuant to Notice of Taking Deposition filed by the Defendant in the above cause.
Thursday, July 27, 2000 505 South 2nd Street Fort Pierce, Florida 9c54 a.m. - 12:25 p.m.
' REPORTING CORP
230 Park Avenue, Suite 650 New York, N e w York 10169
Telephone: 212-557-5558 Fax: 212-557-0050 EmaiI:[email protected]
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 2 of 54
ANDREW K A N E , o f f e r e d . m e the
JR.
job,
so I took i t .
Q-
So y o u c a m e t o S u b u r b i a a s a n
executive vice-president
A. Yes. D i d you
i n 1974?
QCEO? A.
l a t e r become p r e s i d e n t . a n d
Yes.
Q
l a t e r ? A.
When w a s t h a t ,
sir?
About
a year
Maybe
t w o years,
maybe.
o f t h e b o a r d of
Q.
d i r e c t o r s of
A.
A n d w e r e you a m e m b e r
Suburbia,
Yes,
s i r ?
I was.
Q.
directors,
A.
SO.
When d i d y o u
j o i n t h e b o a r d of
do you r e m e m b e r ?
I became p r e s i d e n t
same t i m e ,
'76
or
Q.
chairman? A.
A n d d i d you u l t i m a t e l y
become
Yes. A n d do you r e m e m b e r w h e n you b e c a m e
Q.
chairman? A.
No,
I don't.
Q.
Around 1980?
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 3 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. Around
1980
I would guess, yes.
Q.
And who was the president of Suburbia
when you were chairman? A. Robert Miller. D o you know if h e ' s alive, sir? H e ' s dead. D o you keep in touch with any people
Q.
A.
Q.
from Suburbia? A .. No. Did you serve o n any committees at
Q.
Suburbia, sir? A. Well, as the CEO an e x officio on
every committee really.
Q.
And when you became executive
1974
vice-president in there?
18 19
what were y o u r duties
A.
Administrative basically. D o you remember what Suburbia's
1974?
Q
20
21 22
23
financial condition was in A. No, I don't.
I believe it was okay.
Q
And then Suburbia merged with
Fidelity, didn't it, sir?
A.
Q-
24 25
Yes. Did you take a position with
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 4 of 54
1 2
ANDREW KANE, JR. Fidelity?
A.
Q.
3
4
5
6
Yes. What was your position with Fidelity
after the merger? A. I believe it was vice-chairman. What were your duties a s
7
8 9
Q.
vice-chairman, sir? A. Basically administrative. Were you involved in the d a y - t o - d a y
10 11
Q.
operations of Fidelity, sir? A. Yes. And how long were y o u vice-chairman
12 13
Q
of Fidelity, sir?
A.
Q.
About a year and a half. And then did you take another
position with Fidelity? A. N o , they offered me a consulting
position, and I took that for maybe a month and then left there and went with a place called Central Federal.
QA.
D o you remember when that was, sir? I believe it was in
1986.
Q-
Why did you decide not to take the
consultant's position with Fidelity?
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
( 2 1 2 ) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 5 of 54
ANDREW KANE, J R . BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
D o you remember what Suburbia's asset
size was when you started in 1974? A. Well, I would say close to 5 0 0 That's only a guess.
million maybe.
Q.
And do you remember what the asset
composition was in 1974? A. It was primarily first mortgage
loans, for family mortgage loans.
Q
And again you said that Suburbia's
condition was okay in 1974? A. Yes. Did that ever change, sir? Yes, it did over the years it
Q.
A. changed.
Q.
A.
How did it change? Because of the interest rate
differential.
Q.
And when you say, "interest rate
differential," sir, I just want to know exactly what you mean by that? A. Well, I mean mortgages were pulling
out on the books at an average of about six percent and cost of savings was up around ten
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
* (212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 6 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. percent.
Q.
And the mortgages were long-term
mortgages?
A.
Thirty year mortgages. Was Suburbia alone in facing that
Q.
problem, sir?
A.
N o , it was basically a n industry
problem.
Q.
Did it affect Suburbia more than
other industries o r excuse me more than any other thrifts? A.
Q-
No.
I would say no.
S o many other thrifts i n the industry
were facing the very same problems a s Suburbia was facing?
A.
Yes. MR. MCCLAIN:
I'd like to mark as an
- -
exhibit a document 109.
I think we are u p to
(Defendant's Exhibit No. 109 w a s marked for identification.) BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
I ' v e placed in front of y o u , s i r , It
what's been marked as Defendant's Exhibit 109.
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 7 of 54
18
1
ANDREW K A N E ,
JR.
2
i s a document
B a t e s s t a m p e d OAA0052432 MR. EISENHART:
and 2 4 3 3 .
3
4
I ' m sorry, m i n e is
actually
--
5
6
7
MR. MR.
MCCLAIN: EISENHART:
2344? Yes. Off
the record
a second.
(A discussion w a s held off t h e
8
9
1 0
11
record. )
BY M R . MCCLAIN:
Q.
C a n you t e l l
m e w h a t t h i s is, sir?
1 2
13
Is t h i s a l e t t e r t h a t A. Yes. And
you w r o t e t o M r . V i g n a ?
1 4
15
Q.
f e e l f r e e t o r e a d a s much of sir, but
the
l e t t e r a s you l i k e ,
I ' m going t o a s k you
1 6
q u e s t i o n s about t h e t h i r d f u l l paragraph and
f o u r t h f u l l p a r a g r a p h on t h e f i r s t p a g e .
You've
17
18
1 9 20 2 1
22
read i t , sir?
A. Yes,
I have.
Q.
D o you see t h e t h i r d
f u l l paragraph
it refers t o a negative trend i n operating
p r o f i t a b i l i t y ? A. D o you s e e t h a t ,
sir?
23 24 25
Yes.
Q.
right
When d i d t h a t t r e n d b e g i n ?
W a s
it
around 1 9 7 9 / 1 9 8 0 ?
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 8 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. A. Yes. Prior to that time had Suburbia been
Q.
operating profitably? A. Yes. And do you remember what the profits
Q.
were per year prior to that time?
A.
Q.
A.
No. Ballpark estimate? No. I t ' s a long time ago, wasn't it? Yes. And you said that the negative trend
Q.
rA-
Q.
was due primarily to the high cost of savings and borrowed money. Is that that interest rate
differential that you were referring to before?
17 18 19
A.
Right. Now, in that fourth full paragraph,
Q.
sir, you said that the long range plans to restore profitability included controlling the association's growth to match the earnings potential. How did you expect that to restore profitability, sir?
20
21 22 23 24 25
A.
I don't know really.
Might have been
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 9 of 54
1 2
ANDREW KANE, JR. something I just wrote.
3
4 5
Q.
time, sir? A.
You were chairman and CEO at this
Yes. Did you have your subordinates draft Like
6
7 8
Q.
letters to regulators for you at that time? say Mr. Miller? A.
9
10 11 12
I would say we might have done it i n
conjunction drafted it together.
Q.
Can you think of any waysJ that
controlling Suburbia's growth to match earnings potential woul-d restore profitability?
.
13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
A.
Well, it would reduce the cost of
money, which savings and borrowed money which was
- - savings was I guess about nine o r ten percent,
borrowed money was around the same range maybe.
Q
So by having less borrowings and
savings, you wouldn't have to pay as much out? A. That's right. And by having less savings and
Q
borrowings, of course, that would control your growth? A. Yes. And did you in fact attempt to do
'
Q.
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
( 2 1 2 ) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 10 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. that, sir? A. Yes, we did, but it was difficult. Why was it difficult, sir? It was difficult in that we kept
Q
A.
losing savings you know because of the high cost of money, and to kind of cut that down was - - you know it was very difficult to do.
Q
Would you say that the Long Island
--
what was the market in which Suburbia was competing at that time? A. County. In Long Island, Nassau, Suffolk
Q.
A.
Was that a competitive market, sir? Very competitive. So if Suburbia lowered the rate it
Q.
paid on its savings or borrowings, then other thrifts would step up to the plate and offer more?
A.
Well, other thrifts and also the
brokerage houses.
Q
thrifts? A.
So you weren't just competing with
No, we were competing with the
brokerage houses.
Q.
Would you consider the Long Island
I
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
( 2 1 2 ) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 11 of 54
22 1 2
3
4
ANDREW KANE, J R . market one of the most competitive in the nation? A.
Q.
I would, yes.
Did you at the time that you wrote
5 6
7
8 9
that letter, sir, did you expect Suburbia t o return to profitability? A. The only way I probably expected it
was if things changed I mean.
Q
A.
When you s a y , "things changed " - The cost of borrowing and t.he cost of
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17
savings would go down.
Q.
S o if interest rates fell - We would but you know. Is it fair t o say that other thrifts
A.
Q.
had similar hopes that if interest rates came down that they would also come back to profitability? A. Yes. MR. MCCLAIN: Exhibit 110. (Defendant's Exhibit No. 110 was marked for identification.)
M R . MCCLAIN:
18 19 20 21 22
23
I'll mark this as
I've marked a s Exhibit
110 and handed it t o the witness a document Bates stamped OAA0052225 to 2360. BY MR. MCCLAIN:
24 25
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
* (212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 12 of 54
ANDREW KANE,
A.
JR.
J u s t t h a t h e was I t h o u g h t
I
a fair
examiner.
t h i n k he l e f t and went
somewhere w i t h
the industry.
Q
Do y o u r e m e m b e r m e e t i n g w i t h h i m examination? remember, no.
a f t e r t h i s r e p o r t of
A.
I don't
Q.
A.
You j u s t
remember him?
I remember him.
Q-
And y o u d o n ' t r e m e m b e r d i s c u s s i n g Suburbia?
w i t h him t h e f i n a n c i a l c o n d i t i o n o f
A.
I d o n ' t remember,
no. same p a g e , sir,
Q.
Do y o u s e e o n t h a t
there is a section called operating r e s u l t s a t the b o t t o m of
A.
t h e p a g e on t h e r e p o r t Yes.
summary?
Q.
Do y o u s e e t h a t d u r i n g t h e l a s t t h r e e
semi-annual p e r i o d s S u b u r b i a ' r e p o r t e d d e f i c i t o p e r a t i n g r e s u l t s of dollars?
A.
about f i v e and a h a l f
million
Yes. And w h a t w a s t h e p r i n c i p a l c a u s e o f
Qthat, sir?
A.
The i n t e r e s t r a t e d i f f e r e n t i a l . Were t h e r e a n y o t h e r f a c t o r s t h a t
Q.
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 13 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE,
JR.
2
played a significant
A.
role in this deficit?
3
4
No. So i n t e r e s t r a t e d i f f e r e n t i a l was
Q
5
6
b a s i c a l l y t h e p r i m a r y c a u s e of t h i s ?
A.
Yes. And d i d y o u e x p e c t t h a t if interest faced
Q.
r a t e s came down t h a t y o u w o u l d n o l o n g e r b e with a d e f i c i t
A.
i n operating results?
Yes. Should be s t a r t i n g t o r e t u r n t o
Q.
favorable operating results?
A.
Yes. Now 1 ' 1 1 r e f e r t o y o u , sir, a g a i n on Do you
Q-
t h e b o t t o m r i g h t - h a n d c o r n e r 2355 p l e a s e . s e e t h i s page,
s i r , r e f e r s t o a wholly-owned
s e r v i c e corporation Suburbia?
A.
Yes.
Q.
A.
And i t ' s SFS R e s o u r c e s C o r p o r a t i o n ? Yes. And d o y o u s e e t h e r e i s a d e s c r i p t i o n sir, i n t h e middle of the
Q
of
activities there,
page?
A.
Yes.
Is t h a t
Q.
a f a i r d e s c r i p t i o n of
what
ELISA D R E I E R REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 14 of 54
33
1
2
ANDREW KANE, JR. that were explored by Suburbia a s of September 18, 1981? A. No, I don't. What were t h e various options Were they referring t o the
3
4
5
Qreferring to?
declining net worth position that Suburbia was facing? A.
Q.
I d o n t recall. D o you see the next sentence? The
chairman was authorized t o explore the availability of a n appropriate merger partner. D o you think that was one of t h e options that Suburbia explored at that time? A.
Q
Yes. D o you remember any of the - - what
y o u did to explore the availability of a appropriate merger partner? A.
20 21 22 23 24
25
Y e s , we had discussions with other
institutions.
Q.
D o y o u remember what other
institutions y o u discussed the possible merger with? M R . EISENHART: I'll place o n the
record my objection to this line of
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 5 5 7 - 5 5 5 8
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 15 of 54
34
ANDREW KANE, JR.
questioning.
I believe
t h a t t h i s does not To t h e
go t o i s s u e s of extent
damages i n t h e c a s e .
it is relevant
a t a l l i t goes t o
liability issues.
MR.
MCCLAIN:
M question is not y
It
directed t o l i a b i l i t y issues. damages, Frank. EISENHART: Well,
is t o
MR.
I ' m simply
o b j e c t i n g b e c a u s e I t h i n k you would b e v e r y hard pressed t o define, you t o d o i t , b u t and I ' m not a s k i n g
I ' m simply saying you
w o u l d b e v e r y h a r d p r e s s e d t o d e f i n e how t h i s r e l a t e s i n a n y way t o d a m a g e i s s u e s i n the case. But I ' m s i m p l y p u t t i n g my Go a h e a d .
o b j e c t i o n on t h e r e c o r d .
BY M R .
MCCLAIN:
Q.
Do y o u r e m e m b e r w h a t t h e o t h e r
i n s t i t u t i o n s were?
A.
Yes,
Island Federal,
Southshore
Pederal, ones.
Heritage Federal,
t h e y were t h e s p e c i f i c other
I discussed with
a number o f
associations also. t h e time mergers.
E v e r y b o d y was d i s c u s s i n g a t
Q.
Were t h o s e i n s t i t u t i o n s i n t e r e s t e d i n
ELISA D R E I E R REPORTING C O R P .
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 16 of 54
1
2
ANDREW K A N E ,
JR.
merging with Suburbia?
A.
3
4
Yes. Why d o y o u t h i n k t h e y w e r e i n t e r e s t e d
Q.
5
i n merging with Suburbia?
A.
6
I think --
I really
c a n ' t g i v e you
7 8 9 10
11
a n y r e a s o n why.
Q-
Do y o u r e m e m b e r w h a t S u b u r b i a ' s s i z e
w a s around t h i s time?
A.
Maybe 8 0 0 m i l l i o n . Was S u b u r b i a o n e o f the larger
Q
12 13
14
t h r i , f t s i n Long I s l a n d ?
A.
Yes. Did Suburbia have any f r a n c h i s e
Q.
value, sir?
A.
15
16
I don't
believe so. the larger
17 18 19
20
Q
deposit bases
A.
Did S u b u r b i a h a v e o n e of i n Long I s l a n d ?
I would t h i n k s o ,
yes.
Q.
Do y o u t h i n k t h a t w o u l d b e v a l u a b l e
21 22
t o o t h e r t h r i f t s having access t o t h a t deposit base?
A.
No. Why n o t , sir?
Q.
A.
I t w a s b a s i c a l l y we w e r e a l l
in
ELISA D R E I E R REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 17 of 54
1 2
3
ANDREW KANE,
A.
JR.
Yes. And w h a t d i d y o u c o n c l u d e ? W couldn't f i n d an investor. e Did you remember c o n t a c t i n g a n y
Q.
A.
4
5
6
Q.
investors?
A.
W c o n t a c t e d a number o f e Do y o u r e m e m b e r a n y o f
them.
Q.
A. Company.
them?
The o n l y o n e I r e m e m b e r i s A l l e n a n d
Q.
A.
And why d i d t h e y n o t
I d o n ' t know,
infuse capital?
but
I assume t h e y
thought
i t was n o t g o i n g t o b e a p r o f i t a b l e
v e n t u r e a s l o n g a s i n t e r e s t r a t e s s t a y e d h i g h even if they put c a p i t a l i n .
Q.
Do y o u r e m e m b e r M r .
Beesley ever
saying anything about t h a t meeting?
A.
l i q - u i d a t i n g weak t h r i f t s a t
No. Did any r e g u l a t o r s e v e r s a y t o you
Q
t h a t S u b u r b i a was g o i n g t o b e l i q u i d a t e d ?
A.
No. Did you e v e r s e r i o u s l y t h i n k t h a t
Q
S u b u r b i a would be l i q u i d a t e d ?
A.
No.
ELISA D R E I E R REPORTING C O R P .
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 18 of 54
41
1 2
ANDREW K A N E ,
JR.
Q.
Why n o t ?
The g o v e r n m e n t w a s n ' t
3
4
liquidating thrifts at that p o i n t ?
MR.
of
EISENHART:
I object t o the f o r m
5
t h e question.
I t ' s leading.
I don't
6
7
THE WITNESS: BY M R . MCCLAIN:
remember.
8
9
Q.
that Mr.
D o you s e e t h e v a r i o u s p o s s i b i l i t i e s B e e s l e y m e n t i o n e d and/or
It
noted i n t h i s
1 0
paragraph three?
mergers,
says he m e n t i o n e d u n a s s i s t e d
outside capital,
m e r g e r s w i t h infusion,
FSLIC assistance. MR. BY M R . MCCLAIN: EISENHART:
What's
the question?
Q.
sir, that
The q u e s t i o n i s :
Is i t
fair t o say,
a t t h i s t i m e F S L I C w a s considering about
every s t e p possible t o keep t h r i f t s a f l o a t besides
liquidating? A. Yes. MR. EISENHART: Object to the f o r m of
t h e question.
BY M R . MCCLAIN:
Q
D o you r e m e m b e r w h a t a l t e r n a t i v e s
that point?
that you reviewed at
A.
No.
ELISA DREIER R E P O R T I N G CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 19 of 54
48
ANDREW K A N E ,
JR.
115 w a s
(Defendant's E x h i b i t No. marked for i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . ) BY M R . MCCLAIN:
Q.
the annual
A.
--
I s t h i s a m e s s a g e t h a t you g a v e t o
at
the annual report? so.
D i d you m e a n t o say
I believe
MR.
EISENHART:
a t the annual m e e t i n g ?
MR. BY M R . MCCLAIN: MCCLAIN: Yes,
I ' m sorry.
Q.
paragraph,
1982,
A n d do you s e e i n t h e
first
sir, t h a t w h i l e Suburbia l o s t m o n e y i n
of the net
it w a s about one h a l f 1981?
loss for
the p r i o r year,
A.
Yes. A n d w h y w a s Suburbia st'ill o p e r a t i n g
Q.
under a net loss?
A. B e c a u s e it
s t i l l had t h e i n t e r e s t
rate differential.
Q.
paragraph,
A n d do y o u s e e i n t h e t h i r d f u l l
s i r , you n o t e t h a t t h e f i r s t h a l f o f
1 9 8 2 w a s m a r k e d by u n c e r t a i n t y a n d c o n t i n u i n g h i g h
interest rates.
A. Yes.
Was t h a t t r u e ,
sir?
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 20 of 54
ANDREW KANE,
JR.
Q
- .
What was t h e u n c e r t a i n t y t h a t y o u
referred to?
A.
Whether t h e y were g o i n g t o go up o r
down.
QA.
Uncertainty about Yes.
.
interest rates?
Q.
And t h e f i r s t h a l f
of
1982 t h e y
c o n t i n u e d t o go up o r t h e y c o n t i n u e d t o be h i g h a t least?
A.
Yes. And i t s a y s i n y o u r n e x t s e n t e n c e o r e x c u s e me, by l a t e
Q-
t h a t by l a t e S e p t e m b e r , summer h o w e v e r i n t e r e s t
r a t e s began t o d e c l i n e . sir?
Did t h a t i n f a c t h a p p e n , A. If
I
said so,
it did.
independently recollect
Q.
that
But you d o n ' t
i t happened?
A.
No. Do y o u r e c a l l i n t e r e s t r a t e s time?'
Q
d e c l i n i n g d u r i n g t h a t p e r i o d of
A.
I
d o n ' t know. sir,
Q
it said i f
And t h e f o u r t h f u l l p a r a g r a p h ,
i n t e r e s t r a t e s continue t h e i r decline,
S u b u r b i a s h o u l d b e a b l e t o show a p r o f i t s o m e t i m e
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
(212.) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 21 of 54
1 2
3
ANDREW KANE , J R
.
i n t h e f o u r t h q u a r t e r of
1983.
Why d i d y o u t h i n k t h a t ,
A.
sir?
4
Again,
t h e h i g h c o s t o f money
w o u l d n ' t be costing us. money,
--
c o s t u s a s much a s i t h a d b e e n money, t h e h i g h c o s t of
15
The c o s t o f
I b e l i e v e t h e p r i m e r a t e was a b o u t
percent a t t h a t time.
Q
And i s i t f a i r t o s a y t h a t t h e
d e c l i n e i n i n t e r e s t r a t e s would p r o b a b l y h e l p other t h r i f t s too?
A.
Yes. Do y o u r e m e m b e r i f you d i d p o s t a
Qprofit
a t some t i m e ?
A.
I don ' t
remember.
Q.
Do you s e e i n t h e f i f t h f u l l sir, t h e l a s t p a r a g r a p h on
p a r a g r a p h on t h a t p a g e ,
t h a t p a g e i t r e f e r s t o a l a w s i g n e d by P r e s i d e n t Reagan, comprehensive l e g i s l a t i o n a f f e c t i n g
s a v i n g s and l o a n a s s o c i a t i o n s ?
A.
Yes. Do y o u r e m e m b e r w h a t t h a t l a w w a s ? No. The G a r n - S t . Germain A c t ?
Q.
A.
Q
A.
Could have b e e n .
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 22 of 54
51
ANDREW KANE,
JR.
Q
Act w a s ?
A.
D you know what t h e G a r n - S t . o
Germain
I remember
i t but
I d o n ' t know
e x a c t l y what
i t was.
Did i t g i v e t h r i f t s new p o w e r s ?
Q.
A.
I t gave us a chance t o have checking
w h i c h I t h i n k was a b i g power we h a d . Did i t e n a b l e you t o make more t y p e s loans?
accounts,
Qof
consumer l o a n s and commercial
A.
I don't
remember. sir, t h e second f u l l
Q-
The n e x t p a g e ,
p a r a g r a p h and t h e f i r s t
f u l l paragraph r e f e r s t o
c a p i t a l a s s i s t a n c e program.
A.
Yes. D you remember what t h a t o capital
Q.
a s s i s t a n c e program was?
A.
No. D you remember i f o Suburbia received
Q
capital assistance?
A.
I believe so.
Q
And i n what
form d i d S u b u r b i a r e c e i v e
capital assistance?
A.
I d o n ' t remember.
Q-
The n e t w o r t h c e r t i f i c a t e s ?
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 23 of 54
52
1 2
ANDREW K A N E , A.
JR. i t ,
Sounds l i k e p r o b a b l y c o u l d be
3
4
yes.
Q
D o you r e m e m b e r w h a t n e t w o r t h
5
certificates were?
A. No. You don't r e m e m b e r how net w o r t h
6
7
Q.
8 9 10
11
12
c e r t i f i c a t e s w e r e t r e a t e d on b a l a n c e s h e e t s ?
A. No,
I don't
remember. Suburbia did
Q.
A n d do you r e m e m b e r i f
receive net w o r t h c e r t i f i c a t e s ?
A.
I
believe w e did, yes.
13
14
Q.
D o you r e m e m b e r h o w m u c h i n n e t w o r t h
c e r t i f i c a t e s it received?
A. No. D o you s e e t h e second t o l a s t
15
16
17
18
Q
paragraph, A.
sir?
Yes. D i d you f e e l t h a t a t t h e t i m e ?
If I wrote
1 9
20 21 22
Q.
A.
i t ,
I
felt
i t ,
yes.
Q.
D o ,you' r e m e m b e r f e e l i n g t h a t Suburbia
c o u l d r e m a i n v i a b l e and c o n t i n u e t o m e e t t h e
i n v e s t m e n t s and h o u s i n g needs of our community at
23
24 25
that time?
A. Yes.
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 24 of 54
ANDREW K A N E ,
JR.
QA.
A n d did Suburbia r e m a i n viable? \ N o t a s v i a b l e a s w e - - I w o u l d have
l i k e d t o t r y t o say here.
Q.
s i r ? A.
What w e r e y o u t r y i n g t o s a y h e r e ,
Well,
i f
economic
inflation declined
and i n t e r e s t r a t e s d e c l i n e d ,
t h a t w e w o u l d be a b l e
to,
b u t i t had t o happen f a s t and d i d n ' t happen a s
f a s t a s I w a s hoping it w o u l d .
Q.
A n d w h a t happened t o S u b u r b i a w h e n economic
t h a t d i d n o t happen a s f a s t a s i t c o u l d ,
c o n d i t i o n s d i d n o t i m p r o v e a s f a s t as y o u had
hoped?
A.
W e continued looking for m e r g e r
partners.
Q.
D i d you e x p l o r e any o t h e r m e t h o d s of time? Other
raising capital a t that
MR. MR.
EISENHART: MCCLAIN:
than w h a t ?
O t h e r than m e r g e r
partners.
THE WITNESS: As
I said before, w e
looked f o r o u t s i d e c a p i t a l b u t
work:
BY M R .
it didn't
MCCLAIN:
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 25 of 54
54
1
2
3
ANDREW KANE, JR.
Q-
Any other ways of raising capital
that you explored? A. No. (Defendant's Exhibit No. 116 was marked for identification.) MR. MCCLAIN: Defendant's 116 is These
4
Bates stamped PAA0500642 through 4 3 .
are minutes from the regular monthly meeting board of directors of Suburbia, dated September 16, 1983. BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q
I'll ask to you turn to the second Let me know
page on paragraphs eight and nine. when you've finished reading, sir. A. Okay.
Q.
Mr. Lovely? A.
Do you remember this meeting with
No. Do you remember Mr. Lovely ever
Q.
outlining a plan of merger for Fidelity and Suburbia in a conversion to a stock association? A. No. Do you remember discussing with
Q
Mr. Lovely converting to a stock in connection
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 26 of 54
1 2
3
ANDREW
KANE,
JR.
w i t h A l l e n and C o m p a n y w a s p r i o r
to this.
F i d e l i t y was
Q-
Do you
remember
if
4
5
smaller than A s t o r i a a t t h i s t i m e ?
MR. MR. MR. EISENHART: MCCLAIN: EISENHART:
- -
A s t o r i a or F i d e l i t y ?
6 7
8 9
Suburbia,
excuse m e . that
I ' m sorry,
q u e s t - i o n came o u t BY MR. MCCLAIN:
1 0
11
Q.
Do you
remember
if
F i d e l i t y was
smaller than S u b u r b i a a t t h i s t i m e ?
A. Y.e s And Yes. Do y o u remember how m u c h s m a l l e r ?
1 2 1 3 1 4
15
.
it was s m a l l e r ?
Q.
A.
Q
A.
1 6 1 7
18
I w o u l d guess about
half
the s i z e .
Q.
Do y o u
remember w h y F i d e l i t y w a s
i n t e r e s t e d i n merging w i t h S u b u r b i a a t t h a t t i m e ?
A. No.
1 9 20 2 1
22
Q.
Why do y o u t h i n k F i d e l i t y w a s
time? f o r m of
interested i n m e r g i n g w i t h Suburbia at that
MR.
EISENHART: Object
t o the
23 24 25
the q u e s t i o n ,
c a l l s for speculation.
I really can't
THE W I T N E S S :
--
e v e r y b o d y w a s t a l k i n g mergers a t t h a t t i m e .
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 27 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE,
J R
.
2
3
4
I ' m s u r e F i d e l i t y was t a l k i n g w i t h a l o t of other people a l s o .
BY MR.
MCCLAIN:
5
6
7
'
Q
Do you remember i f
you w e r e t a l k i n g
t o o t h e r i n s t i t u t i o n s t o o a b o u t a p o s s i b l e merger a t t h a t time?
A.
.
8
9
I was c o n s t a n t l y t a l k i n g t o o t h e r
institutions.
10
11
Q.
What o t h e r i n s t i t u t i o n s w e r e you
t a l k i n g t o a t t h a t time?
A.
12
Maybe S u f f o l k C o u n t y F e d e r a l ,
County
13
14
Federal,
we w e r e t a l k i n g - - e v e r y b o d y was t a l k i n g W had m e e t i n g s , e r e g i o n a l meetings
t o each o t h e r .
15
and weld d i s c u s s i t a t t h o s e m e e t i n g s .
16
17
Q.
Do you remember a n y o t h e r
i n s t i t u t i o n s o t h e r t h a n t h e o n e s t h a t you j u s t mentioned?
A.
18
19
No.
Well o t h e r t h a n t h e o n e s I h a d
20
an agreement w i t h a t one t i m e .
Q
22 23 24 25
A.
Heritage? H e r i t a g e I s l a n d and S o u t h s h o r e . And t h i s i s a f t e r t h a t f e l l through,
Q.
i s n tt
it?
A.
I ' m not s u r e .
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 28 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE,
JR.
2
d o c u m e n t B a t e s s t a m p e d WOL3150758 t h r o u g h 0 7 8 6 . T h i s i s a r e p o r t of 1983. examination, dated October 7,
3
4
I ' d l i k e you t o t u r n t o p a g e 2 . 1 ,
A.
sir.
5
6
7
Yes. And t h e f i r s t p a r a g r a p h s a y s t h a t the
Q-
association experienced operating l o s s e s of $ 1 6 , 4 2 0 , 0 0 0 f o r t h e y e a r - e n d e d December 3 1 , and j u s t under s i x m i l l i o n s d o l l a r s f o r n i n e 1983. So o p e r a t i n g 1982
8 9 10
11 12
13
months e n d i n g September 30,
l o s s e s w e r e down f r o m t h e y e a r b e f o r e ?
A.
Yes And why i s t h a t , Because of
Q.
A.
sir?
14
interest rates primarily. Service
15
16
17
Q.
Any o t h e r f a c t o r s ?
c o r p o r a t i o n income?
A.
A
l i t t l e b i t of
this but primarily
18 19
20
the interest rate differential.
Q.
t h a t page,
Do y o u s e e i n t h e f o u r t h p a r a g r a p h of sir,
i t s a y s management's been
21 22
following the business plan it submitted to the F e d e r a l Home Loan Bank B o a r d i n J u n e o f you s e e t h a t ,
A.
1983.
Do
23
24 25
sir?
Yes. Were you i n v o l v e d a t a l l i n
Q-
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
( 2 1 2 ) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 29 of 54
64
1 2
A N D R E W KANE,
JR.
Q.
Was t h e c o n s u m e r l e n d i n g o p e r a t i o n
3
4
g r e a t l y expanded?
A.
I don't
think so, no.
5 6
Q.
A.
Why n o t ? Because of the competition i n the
a r e a w i t h commercial banks.
Q.
A.
What d o y o u mean b y c o m p e t i t i o n , Well,
sir?
t h e r e i s o n l y s o much c o n s u m e r and t h e commercial banks were And w e ' d j u s t started in i t , and
lending available, i n it for years.
we h a d t o s t a r t f r o m s c r a t c h , w e l l a s we m i g h t h a v e h o p e d .
s o i t d i d n ' t work a s
Q.
Did consumer l e n d i n g p r o v e t o be
p r o f i t a b l e f o r Suburbia?
A.
Yes. Who was t h e new v i c e - p r e s i d e n t hired
Q.
f o r consumer l e n d i n g ?
A.
I d o n ' t remember.
Q.
21
The s e c o n d t o l a s t s e n t e n c e o n t h a t s a y s t h a t t h e major p r o j e c t t o improve
page,
sir,
22 23 24 25
n e t worth i s a planned s a l e of b r a n c h o f f i c e s . Do y o u r e m e m b e r i f b r a n c h o f f i c e s w e r e s o l d b y Suburbia? A. No, they weren't.
ELISA D R E I E R REPORTING C O R P .
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 30 of 54
ANDREW K A N E ,
JR.
QA.
Why n o t ?
I
a s s u m e we c o u l d n ' t g e t a n y b u y e r s . in those
Q.
Was F i d e l i t y i n t e r e s t e d
branch o f f i c e s ?
A.
I don't
think so.
Q.
Do you r e m e m b e r w h a t F i d e l i t y d i d
w i t h t h e b r a n c h o f f i c e s a f t e r t-hey were a c q u i r e d i n t h e merger?
MR.
11
EISENHART:
I think you've
just
made y o u r p r i o r q u e s t i o n v e r y a m b i g u o u s . You a s k e d him i f Fidelity was interested i n
12
13
14
t h e branch o f f i c e s , i n t h e c o n t e x t of of October 7,
and I t h i n k he answered of examinati'on
t h i s report
15
16
17
1983.
Y o u ' v e now j u m p e d a h e a d
t o t h e merger.
MR.
MCCLAIN: sir?
Did y o u u n d e r s t a n d m y
18 19 20
21
question,
T H E WITNESS:
I understand
it
t o be
this
(indicating,) yes. MR. EISENHART: Referring t o the
22
23
report.
BY M R . MCCLAIN:
24 25
Q.
Do you r e m e m b e r ,
sir,
if
Fidelity
s o l d the branches?
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
( 2 1 2 ) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 31 of 54
66
ANDREW KANE, J R .
A.
No, they maintained all branches. Do you remember after the merger
Q
Fidelity ever discussing selling branch offices of Suburbia? A. No. Do you remember which branch offices
Q.
you contemplated selling?
A.
No, no idea.
Q
If you could turn to again going to
765.
the bottom right-hand corner of
A.
Okay. The bottom of the page has a
Q.
reference to Shoreham Development and SFS Resources Corporation.
A.
Do you see that, sir?
Yes. And it shows retained earnings of 931
Q-
and are those thousands of dollars? A. Yes. And 600. Does that indicate to you
Q.
that these service corporations were profitable, sir? A. Yes. And all told those two service
Q.
corporations were profitable to the tune of 1.8
ELISA D R E I E R
REPORTING
CORP.
* (212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 32 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. All the same operation? It was all part of the lending division.
Q.
And do you see under mortgage banking
on the next page, sir, it says this would afford us considerable servicing income o n an ongoing basis? And I think i t ' s talking about y o u r
selling strategy to Freddie Mac? A. Yes. And did that give y o u considerable
Q
servicing income? A. We had some; I don't know how much. And that became Fidelity's part o f
Q.
the merger, didn't i t , sir? A.
17 18
19
Yes. Is it fair so say, sir, this business
Q.
plan anticipated a road to profitability? MR. EISENHART: the question. THE WITNESS: question. B Y MR. MCCLAIN: I don't understand the Object to the form of
20
21
22
23
24
Q.
Let's take a look again at page 271,
25
and we looked at these different indicia before.
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
* (212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 33 of 54
80
ANDREW KANE, JR.
2
And is it fair to say that Suburbia anticipated that it would become more profitable in 1985? MR. EISENHART: the question. THE WITNESS: BY MR. MCCLAIN: This was our plan. Object to the form of
3 4
5
6 7
8
Q-
S o the plan indicates or the plan
9 10 11
contains what you anticipated Suburbia would d o in the following year? A. Yes. And there i s n o mention in here that
Q
13 14
15
y o u anticipated that you would become insolvent and liquidate, is there? MR. EISENHART: the question. THE WITNESS: NO. Object to the form of
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23
(Defendant's Exhibit No. 121 was marked for identification.) MR. MCCLAIN: Defendant's Exhibit 121
is a document that's been Bates stamped PAA0920066 and 0067. BY MR. MCCLAIN:
24 25
Q
D o you see in the second paragraph,
sir, if you could just read that a moment and I ' l l
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
* (212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 34 of 54
82
1 2
ANDREW
KANE,
JR.
s e c o n d f u l l p a r a g r a p h on t h a t p a g e b e g i n n i n g w i t h interest rates s t a b i l i z e or decline s l i g h t l y , s h o u l d be a b e t t e r y e a r f o r S u b u r b i a F e d e r a l .
A.
3
4
1984
5
6
Yes. And you a n t i c i p a t e d i n 1984 i t would
Q.
be a b e t t e r y e a r f o r S u b u r b i a ?
A.
Yes. Why d i d you t h i n k t h a t the interest result in a
Q-
r a t e s t a b i l i z a t i o n o r d e c l i n e would b e t t e r year f o r Suburbia?
A.
B e c a u s e . o u r c o s t of
money w o u l d g o
down.
Q.
And d i d i n t e r e s t r a t e s s t a b i l i z e o r
d e c l i n e s l i g h t l y i n 1984?
A.
I d o n 1t
recall.
Q
Do you s e e a l s o on t h a t s e c o n d p a g e
t h a t S u b u r b i a h a s e n a c t e d a number o f p r o g r a m s which s h o u l d improve e a r n i n g s i n 1984 and f u t u r e years?
A.
Yes. And d o you remember w h a t t h o s e
Q-
programs were?
A.
No. The e q u i p m e n t l e a s i n g p r o g r a m , was
Q-
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 35 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE, JR. that one of them? A. I d o n ' t recall. Who's Mr. Joseph A. O I C o n n o r ? I don't remember. (Defendant's Exhibit No. 122 was marked for identification.) MR. MCCLAIN: I've placed in front of
2
3
4
Q.
A.
5
6
the witness a document that has been marked as Defendant's Exhibit 122. stamped OAA0052722 to 2723. I t ' s Bates
BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
It says that y o u ' r e aware that - -
very much aware if interest rates remain at current 'market levels, the associationls liability will depend upon its ability to obtain a significant capital infusion and/or continued regulatory assistance. What type of regulatory assistance were you referring to? A. Net worth certificates?
'
I assume net worth certificates. Do you see in the fourth paragraph
Q
you're talking about
- - talk about a merger with
another Long Island based federal savings and loan association. Do you remember who that
- -
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
* (212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 36 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE, JR.
2
3
Q.
Now, is it fair to say that if you
mark the assets of most thrifts in the industry at that period of time, 1982/1983, the book value of assets would exceed the market value of the assets?
4
5
MR. EISENHART:
the question.
Object to the form of
You can answer. I assume so.
THE WITNESS: BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
And who was ultimately responsible
for the difference between the book value and the market value of the assets in the event of a liquidation? MR. EISENHART: 'the question. Object to the form of
You can answer it. I don't know.
THE WITNESS: BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
Let's take a liquidation scenario.
A
thrift is liquidated, what happens to its assets?
A.
Probably would be taken over by the
FSLIC.
Q.
And what would FSLIC d o with the Sell them? They would sell them.
assets? A.
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 37 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE,
JR.
2
preparation of
A.
t h i s proposed merger plan? remember. you were involved
3
4
I don't
Q.
Do y o u r e m e m b e r i f
5
6
a t a l l i n d i s c u s s i o n s i n what d i r e c t i o n t h e r e s u l t i n g a s s o c i a t i o n would t a k e a f t e r t h e merger?
A.
7 8
9
10
11
No.
MR.
EISENHART:
I'm not No,
sure I
understood your answer. recall or -THE WITNESS:
I don't BY MR.
you d o n ' t
No,
I
d o n ' t remember.
12
recall.
13
14
MCCLAIN:
Q.
Did you h a v e a n y r o l e
in the
15
16
a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of merger?
A.
Suburbia's assets a f t e r the
17 18 19 20
21
No. T h a t was a l l F i d e l i t y ? E v e r y t h i n g was F i d e l i t y a f t e r t h e
Q.
A.
merger.
Q.
And y o u d i d n ' t p l a y a n y r o l e i n i n what b u s i n e s s
22 23
24 25
a s s i s t i n g F i d e l i t y ' s management operations it should undertake?
A.
I was part
of
F i d e l i t y ' s management. right. Did y o u
Q.
You w e r e p a r t ,
ELISA D R E I E R REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 38 of 54
92
ANDREW KANE, JR.
p e r s o n a l l y h a v e a n y r o l e i n d e c i d i n g what F i d e l i t y would do w i t h S u b u r b i a ' s a s s e t s ?
MR.
EISENHART:
He j u s t
said after
I
t h e merger t h e y were F i d e l i t y ' s a s s e t s . object t o the form-of the question. s u r e what y o u ' r e a s k i n g him.
B Y MR.
MCCLAIN:
I'm not
QA.
You c a n a n s w e r .
I had r e s p o n s i b i l i t y
for the t o t a l
a s s e t s of
t h e a s s o c i a t i o n , which was F i d e l i t y ,
w h i c h was S u b u r b i a ' s a n d F i d e l i t y ' s .
Q.
So F i d e l i t y ' s
assets included assets
t h a t were f o r m e r l y S u b u r b i a ' s , c o r r e c t ?
A.
Yes. Now d i d y o u h a v e a n y r o l e i n F i d e l i t y t h a t once
Q.
a d m i n i s t e r i n g t h e a s s e t s of were S u b u r b i a ' s a s s e t s ?
MR.
EISENHART: Go a h e a d ,
He j u s . t a n s w e r e d t h a t you c a n a n s w e r i t
question. again.
THE WITNESS: same.
They w e r e a l l t h e
M e r g e d a n d e v e r y t h i n g was t o g e t h e r .
W d i d n ' t s a y t h i s i s Suburbia and t h i s i s e Fidelity. E v e r y t h i n g was a l l m e r g e d .
\.
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 39 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
any way? A.
So you didn't segregate the assets in
No. Did you have any role in directing
Q-
the operations of Fidelity after the merger? A. Yes. What was that role? Basically an administrative role. What do you mean by an administrative
Q
A.
Qrole?
A.
Well, the operations, day-to-day
operations of the institution.
Q
And what about the day-to-day
operations of the institution were you involved? A.
Q-
I don't remember exactly.
Before the merger, do you remember
discussing with Mr. Lovely or any of Fidelity's management about how the resulting association would be run? A. No. Did you have any discussions with
Q.
Mr. Lovely about what investments the resulting association would make?
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 5 5 7 - 5 5 5 8
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 40 of 54
ANDREW KANE, J R .
A.
Not really, no. What do you mean by not really? Well, I don't remember I'll put it
Q.
A.
that way.
Q.
If you could take a look at this I ' l l ask y o u again, do you
Exhibit 62 again, sir.
think you had any involvement in the preparation of this proposed merger plan? MR. EISENHART: answered. THE WITNESS: BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
Objection, asked and
Yes, I did.
You did? T o what extent I don't remember. If y o u could turn to the second page, I t ' s Bate's stamped
A.
Q-
the page after that, sir.
0483
in the corner. A.
Q-
Okay. The first paragraph says: By
combining the two institutions, the services t.0 depositors will be expanded and increased b y introducing new services at both institutions to each others depositors; such a s , discount brokerage in all offices, life insurance i n all
.
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 41 of 54
ANDREW KANE, J R . A.
Q.
Yes. Do you remember if Fidelity was prior
to the merger?
A.
Q.
I don't remember. How about student loans, was Suburbia
offering student loans? A. Yes. Do you remember if Fidelity was? I don't remember. How about business loans, was
Q.
A.
Q.
Suburbia offering business loans prior to the merger? A. I don't know. How about home improvement loans? Yes. Was Fidelity offering home
QA.
Q.
improvements loans? A. I don't remember. Let me ask you this: Did Fidelity
Q-
pay anything for Suburbia?
A.
No.
To whom would they pay? Why did you
Q-
Well, I don't know.
merge with Fidelity?
A.
Because it seemed like an opportun-ity
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 5 5 7 - 5 5 5 8
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 42 of 54
1 2
ANDREW
KANE,
JR.
a t the time.
W e were g o i n g t o have
some o f
our
3
4
d i r e c t o r s on a combined b o a r d , would s t a y i n p l a c e , t o do.
a l l o u r management
a n d i t seemed t h e r i g h t t h i n g
5
6
Q.
liquidated if
A.
Did you f e a r t h a t you would b e you d i d n ' t do t h e m e r g e r ? Not n e c e s s a r i l y l i q u i d a t e d , but
I
7
8
9 10
11
t h o u g h t maybe we w o u l d h a v e a n u n f r i e n d l y m e r g e r s e t u p by t h e e f f o r t s o f no c o n t r o l o v e r a n y of FSLIC, w h i c h ~ w o u l dh a v e
our destinies.
12 13
14
Q.
merger?
A.
And t h i s y o u r e g a r d e d a s a f r i e n d l y
Yes. Had y o u known m a n a g e m e n t o f Fidelity
15 16 17 18 19
20 21
Q-
p r i o r t o the negotiations regarding the possible merger?
A.
Yes. And w h a t w a s y o u r o p i n i o n o f
Q.
F i d e l i t y ' s management?
A.
It was rather
s h a l l o w a n d t h a t was
22 23
24
one o f t h e r e a s o n s I t h o u g h t i t would be a good merger, b e c a u s e I t h o u g h t we h a d g o o d m a n a g e m e n t
a n d i t would b e a good m i x .
25
Q.
You s a y y o u t h o u g h t
that Fidelity's
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
( 2 1 2 ) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 43 of 54
ANDREW KANE,
JR
.
management was r a t h e r s h a l l o w ?
A.
Yes. What d i d y o u mean b y t h a t ? O u t s i d e of D i c k , L o v e l y and Bruno
QA. Greco,
i t was n e v e r - - r e a l l y n o o t h e r t o p
I would c o n s i d e r t o p management.
management what
Q.
Who f r o m S u b u r b i a ' s m a n a g e m e n t the association. You,
stayed
on a s a r e s u l t of
M r .
Miller - A.
. M r .
Miller stayed on,
Mr.
Steine,
M r .
Ogera.
Q.
A.
M r .
Ryan?
Who? Ryan? He was n o t m a n a g e m e n t . He was a
Q.
A.
board d i r e c t o r .
QFidelity?
A.
How l o n g d i d M r .
M i l l e r stay a t
He s t a y e d f o r a b o u t a c o u p l e o f
months and t o o k a c o n s u l t i n g p o s i t i o n w i t h them.
Q.
months?
A.
Why d i d h e o n l y s t a y f o r a c o u p l e of
I don't
t h i n k he and Bruno Greco g o t
along.
ELISA D R E I E R REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 44 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR.
Q.
A.
Why do you say that, sir? Just a feeling, that's all. Was Mr. Miller criticized as being
Q.
too active in board of directors meetings? A. No. Was he criticized for being t o o
Q.
critical of Mr. Greco? A. No. What was it about them that didn't
Q.
match? A.
I have no idea.
If you will turn to the next page,
Q.
s i r , introduction, 0484, do you see that? A.
Q
Yes. And there is a profile to merging
associations, and it appears that Suburbia is bigger in assets, savings and mortgages and has more branches than Suburbia, correct? than Fidelity, correct? A.
Q.
Or had more
Yes. Do you see above that there is a
sentence that says that there is n o overlap of markets and economy is t o be achieved by t h e merger planned of 1.0 million dollars in overhead,
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 45 of 54
1 2 3
4
ANDREW KANE, JR. including the attrition of personnel requirements. Is it true that there's no overlap of markets, sir?
A.
5
6 7
Yes. And that was a benefit to Fidelity
Q.
8 9 10 11
12
and the resulting association? A. Yes. D o you know if the economies ever
Q.
achieved by the merger were at a minimum of 1.0 million dollars? A. I don't know. Were there economies that were
13 14 15
16 17
Q-
achieved by the merger? A. I don't remember. You don't remember if there were any
Q.
18 19 20 21 22 23
24
operating economies? A. I don t reme.mber. D o you see o n that page, sir, the
Q.
last sentence of that paragraph above profile of merging associations it says, the resulting association must be allowed to use purchase method accounting in order for it t o be beneficial. A. Yes.
25
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 46 of 54
1
ANDREW K A N E , going f o r w a r d ? A. Yes. D o you k n o w i f
JR.
2
3
4
Q.
F i d e l i t y w a s caught i n
5
6
the same interest rate i n t e r m e d i a t i o n ?
MR. MR. MR.
EISENHART: MCCLAIN: EISENHART:
At what
Sir.
time?
7
8 9
10
11
O b j e c t to the
f o r m of
t h e q u e s t i o n u n l e s s you d e f i n e a t i m e . THE WITNESS: BY MR. MCCLAIN: P r i o r to the m e r g e r ?
12
Q.
Yes.
Well,
d o you t h i n k t h e y w e r e
caught i n the i n t e r m e d i a t i o n w h e n t h e i n t e r e s t
rates f e l l ?
A.
T h e y had m o r e a s s e t s on s h o r t - t e r m
m o n e y than they did i n m o r t g a g e
loans.
four, ,
That five
s h o r t - t e r m m o n e y w e n t over t h r e e , months.
Q.
Astoria? A.
And
so t h a t
enabled t h e m t o a c q u i r e
A c q u i r e Suburbia. A c q u i r e Suburbia,
Q.
know i f
excuse m e .
Do you
F i d e l i t y s o l d any a s s e t s t h a t f o r m e r l y
w e r e on S u b u r b i a . ! ~ o o k a f t e r t h e m e r g e r ? b A. Yes.
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 47 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR.
Q.
Which assets? Some of the mortgage loans. D o you know if Fidelity realized a
A.
Q.
profit on those? A. I d o n 1t recall. D o you know if they sold any other
Q-
assets aside from those mortgage loans? A. Not that I know of.
M R . MCCLAIN:
L e t ' s take a
five-minute break, and I'll see what I have left and then be ready. (A recess was taken.)
BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
If y o u could turn, s i r , to 488 of Were you involved at all in
that exhibit.
analyzing what the purchase accounting adjustments would be for the merger? A. I don't recall. D o you see at the bottom of the page,
Q.
sir, there is a column for discount accretion, goodwill amortization and net adjustments for Suburbia's adjustment?
A.
D o you see that?
U h huh. And there are rows corresponding to
Q.
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 48 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. years; do you see that, sir?
A.
Yes. What is your understanding of what
Q.
discount accretion is, sir?
A.
I'm not sure. Did you have any involvement in
Q.
deciding what the discount accretion and goodwill amortization of Suburbia would be, of Suburbia's assets would be? MR. EISENHART: In the mergers that
took place as distinguished from the one that's discussed o n this page? MR. MCCLAIN: Yes. I'll think you'll
see, Frank, it's the same. THE WITNESS: of this. I was involved in a lot
I don't specifically recall being
involved in this particular discussion. BY MR. MCCLAIN:
Q.
Were you involved at all in the
negotiations with regulators in connection with the merger? A. I believe s o , yes. Do you remember any of the
Q.
negotiations?
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 49 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE, JR. A.
Q
2
3
No. Do you remember any discussions about
4
financial assistance? A. No. MR. MCCLAIN: questions. CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR. EISENHART:
Q
5
6
I have no further
Mr. Kane, for some period of years
prior to its merger with Fidelity, Suburbia was suffering losses on a regular basis, was it not? A.
Q.
Yes. And in fact we've seen from t h e
documents Mr. McClain showed you y o u were suffering those losses every quarter? A. Yes. When Suburbia would suffer those
Q.
losses on a quarterly basis, what effect did that have on the institution's capital? A. Reduced it. S o as a result of these losses that
Q
occurred o n a regular basis for a number of years prior to the merger, what was Suburbia's capital situation at the time that it finally merged with
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 50 of 54
1
ANDREW KANE, J R . Fidelity? A. It was below regulatory requirements. And in fact were you virtually out of
Q
capital by the time you merged? A. Yes. Now if Suburbia had not merged with
Q.
Fidelity and had kept on posting regular losses, would there have come a time when its capital would have gone negative? A. Yes. That was inevitable, wasn't it? Yes. Simple mathematics? Yes. What in your experience did the
Q.
A.
Q.
A.
Q-
regulators typically do to institutions when their capital dipped below regulatory minimums?
MR. MCCLAIN:
THE WITNESS: another institution. BY MR. EISENHART:
Q.
Objection. They merged them with
What in your experience did the
regulators typically do to institutions that had no capital left or were in a negative capital
'
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 5 5 7 - 5 5 5 8
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 51 of 54
1 2
3
ANDREW KANE, JR. situation? MR. MCCLAIN: answered. THE WITNESS: As I said, they merged Objection, asked and
6 7
8
and went through some savings institution of their choice. BY MR. EISENHART:
9
10 . 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Q.
And what alternatives did the
regulators have in your experience if they were not able to merge such an institution into another institution? A. were.
I don't know what their alternatives
I would assume it would be liquidated.
Q.
Now, Mr. McClain asked you about your
definition of goodwill, and you said I think that it was the difference between the market value and the book value of the institution's assets? A. Yes. Is it safe to say that you haven't
i9
20 21 22 23 24 25
Q
practiced accounting for a number of years? A. Yes. Might you be wrong about that? Yes. I want to show you Exhibit D 1 2 1 .
Q
A.
Q.
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 52 of 54
ANDREW KANE,
JR.
Q.
A.
And y o u b e l i e v e d t h a t Yes. When y o u s a y i f
in April
1984?
Q.
i n t e r e s t r a t e s were levels, y o u mean i f
t o remain a t c u r r e n t market t h e y d o n ' t come down?
A.
Yes. So a s of A p r i l 1984 you e i t h e r needed
Q
t h o s e i n t e r e s t r a t e s t o move d o w n w a r d o r y o u n e e d e d a c a p i t a l i n f u s i o n o r you n e e d e d a continued regulatory assistance?
A.
Yes. And i f y o u d i d n ' t g e t o n e o f those
Q.
t h i n g s , you w e r e n ' t g o i n g t o s u r v i v e ?
A.
Yes. Now y o u g o o n t o s a y , The b o a r d h a s
Q.
i n s t r u c t e d management
t o explore every area f o r a Were y o u i n f a c t d o i n g
possible capital infusion. that?
A.
Yes,
from a merger,
from i n v e s t o r s . h a s had
Q
S i n c e . O c t o b e r 1 9 8 3 management
d i s c u s s i o n s w i t h a number o f p o t e n t i a l Did you h a v e s u c h d i s c u s s i o n s ?
A.
investors.
Yes,
we d i d .
At
Q-
It says,
t h i s time,
meaning
in
ELISA D R E I E R R E P O R T I N G C O R P .
*
(212) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 53 of 54
ANDREW KANE, JR. April of '84, one potential investor is reviewing our financial statements and we expect to hear from him in the near future regarding a capital infusion. Did that ever happen? MR. MCCLAIN: Did what ever happen?
BY MR. EISENHART:
Q.
Did you ever hear from him? I don't recall. Did you ever get a capital infusion
A.
Q.
from him? A.
Q-
No. It says here y o u ' r e discussing a
merger with another Long Island based federal savings and loan, and I think you said you didn't remember which one that was? A. I don't remember. And you said you're looking t o raise
Q.
additional capital through preferred stock through a financial service corporation, and I guess that didn't happen? A. Didn't happen, no. And it said you were looking for the
Q.
sale of branch offices t o help you raise capital and that didn't happen?
ELISA DREIER REPORTING CORP. *
( 2 1 2 ) 557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-3
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 54 of 54
1
ANDREW K A N E , A. No.
So i s i t
JR.
2
3
4
Q.
f a i r t o say,
safe t o say, i s
i t a c c u r a t e t o s a y i n A p r i l of
1 9 8 4 you w e r e
5
l o o k i n g a t every p o s s i b l e avenue t o t r y t o g e t a
6
7
8
,capital infusion t o s t a y - a l i v e ?
A. T h a t ' s correct. A n d i n t h e end the o n l y t h i n g t h a t
Q-
9 1 0
11 12
you w e r e a b l e t o do w a s e f f e c t a m e r g e r w i t h
Fidelity? A. T h a t ' s correct. A n d t h a t w a s done w i t h t h e f u l l the r e g u l a t o r s ? Yes, it w a s .
Q.
knowledge of A.
1 3 14
15
Q.
of
A n d t h a t w a s done a t t h e i n s t i g a t i o n
1 6
17
18
the regulators?
A.
Yes,
MR.
it w a s . EISENHART: T h a n k you,
M r .
Kane.
1 9
20 21
22 23 24
I
d o n ' t have any o t h e r q u e s t i o n s . MR. MCCLAIN:
I have n o f o l l o w - u p .
T h a n k you v e r y m u c h f o r y o u r t i m e ,
Mr.
Kane.
MR.
EISENHART:
L e t ' s
state f o r the
record I . w i l l r e t a i n t h e o r i g i n a l e x h i b i t s
that w e r e m a r k e d during t h i s deposition a n d
25
E L I S A DREIER REPORTING CORP.
*
(212)
557-5558
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-4
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 1 of 27
UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
ASTORIA FEDERAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATION,
&
LOAN
Plaintiff,
- against
-
Case No. 95
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X
August 7,
9:50
2000
a.m.
Deposition of Christopher Quackenbush, taken by Defendant, at the offices of Thacher Proffitt
&
Wood, Two World Trade Center, New
York, New York, before Kelly Culen, a Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public within and for the State of New York.
2 3 0 Park Avenue, Suite 650 New York, New York 10169
Telephone: 2 1 2-557-5558 Fax: 212-557-0050
Email:[email protected]
Case 1:95-cv-00468-TCW
Document 185-4
Filed 03/28/2007
Page 2 of 27
Quackenbush
1 2 3 4
Q.
And you said you were talking about your What analysis was that? Of the acquisition. I looked at the
analysis. A. summary.
5
6
I guess the one document that was there
was a summary pro forma financial impact of the transaction. I just really wanted to try and
7
8
9
10
remember the relative sizes of the companies. It's been a while. Q. And what did you recall after having
looked at this document? A. There was a couple billion dollar - -
Fidelity was a couple of billion in size, that we paid $ 2 9 for or thereabouts. That there was
about a hundred million dollars in goodwill generated for the deal. Pretty summary. Q. A. Q.
21 22
- .. ---
Not much more than that.
What was your role in that merger? Advising Astoria. What was your role in that? Financial analysis of the pro forma