Free Appendix - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case1:O4-cv-01538-SLR Ijdéu-rhéntQ5-4 U nnnnn F i'ié&10/66/20’05" Pagei cfs

_ ‘ Case 1:04-cv-01538-SLR Document 95-4 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 2 of 3
_ . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTR.IC'1' COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
HEIDI VASCEK, individually and as :
· Admlnlstratrlx ofthe ESTATE OF :
JOHN VASCEK., JR., :
Plaintiffs, :
: C.A. N0. 04-1538
vs.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and
MARK HARD, :
Defendants. :
DEFENDA.N'I`S’ RESPONSE T0 PLAITIFF’S REQUEST FOR INSPECTION AN D
TESTING QE THE QQEJECT UQS VAN PURSUAQQIQ TO gU]=E 34
l-8. OBJ ECTION. Defendants object to this request as it is unduly burdensome, prejudicial
and exceeds the scope of discovery pursuant to F.R-C.P. 34. Plaintiffs attorney and expert have
._ already inspected the UPS package ven. In addition, plaintiffs second inspection is not at all the
inspection originally agreed to by defendants. Plaintiff s foregoing request is not at all for an .
additional inspection per Rule 34, but rather a comprehensive accident reconstmctien. Plaintiff
is not entitled to use UPS’s property for the purpose of conducting a reconstruction ofthe
accident nor is UPS obligated to make its property available for such use.
` RAVYLE & HEND- N LLP
ff'. £ \..g-·‘*""—’r
William J`. Cattle, I I, Esquire (#953)
Attorneys f Def dants
300 Delawaixcéwenue — Suite 1015
Wi1mir¤.gton,DE 19899
Telephone: (302) 778-1200
\
Lt/69 39'Ud SHLVIDUSSV ¤Nv Slv>1 BBEBSEEEIZI BE =Zt SEJBZJSB/at

, Case 1:04-cv-01538-SLR Document 95-4 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 3 of 3
DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LZLP
O. Daniel Ansa(acIm1`zzadpr0 hem v/ce)
Jayne A, R,isk,(adm1‘nec/_pr0 hac vice)
Attomeys for Defendants,
One Liberty Place
1650 Market Street, Suite 4900
Philadelphia, PA 19103
· I Telephone: (215) 656-3 328
Dawdr
I
/LI/B`lZ EBV:} SEILVIDUSSV (INV SJ.V>1 BBEBSEEZSTZT BE ¥Z1Z SGBZ/SB/BI