Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 1 of 15
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS HOMER J. HOLLAND, STEVEN BANGERT, Co-Executor of The Estate Of HOWARD R. ROSS, AND FIRST BANK Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 95-524 C (Judge G. Miller)
PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS TO DEFENDANT'S EXPERT WITNESS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
I.
Objections to Defendant's Deposition Excerpts A. Objections to Defendant's Deposition Designations of Homer Holland Objection(s)1 omits question; lacks context to the point that the excerpt is not understandable; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented omits question; lacks context to the point that the excerpt is not understandable; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented
Transcript Citation 10/31/01 Tr. 21:8-18
10/31/01 Tr. 25:5-21
1031/01 Tr. 37:8-39:16
1
Plaintiffs preserve all objections that were stated on the record or that are preserved pursuant to the Court's Rules or any governing law.
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 2 of 15
10/31/01 Tr. 67:7-14
beyond the permissible scope of the deposition in that it seeks fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; lines 10-12 exceed the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition; omits portion of response
11/01/01 Tr. 169:25-170:6
11/01/01 Tr. 175:3-180:11
11/01/01 Tr. 201:1-12
11/01/01 Tr. 203:8-20
11/01/01 Tr. 205:11-206:7
11/01/01 Tr. 208:25-210:16
irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition; omits portion of response omits portion of question; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented;
11/01/01 Tr. 210:20-212:4
11/01/01 Tr. 222:25-224:21
-2-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 3 of 15
11/01/01 Tr. 2237:9-240:24
11/01/01 Tr. 242:1-4
240:10-24 exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; omits question; omits portion of response irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; omits question irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; omits question; omits portion of response; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; omits question; omits portion of response; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; omits question; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; omits question; exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; portions exceed the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition;
11/02/01 Tr. 314:23-315:1
11/02/01 Tr. 316:7-12
11/02/01 Tr. 317:21-24
11/02/01 Tr. 319:18-22
11/02/01 Tr. 329:4-6
11/02/01 Tr. 362:20-363-8
11/02/01 Tr. 382:20-384:4
11/02/01 Tr. 395:17-24
11/02/01 Tr. 473:22-484:15
-3-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 4 of 15
11/02/01 Tr. 485:3-7
irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; irrelevant because witness merely confirms he is offering no legal opinion 17:4-5 are irrelevant notations; entire exchange is irrelevant to any material issue irrelevant to any material issue irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; irrelevant and not best evidence because witness is asked merely to confirm that he sees a particular statement in a document; exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; so lacking in context as to make the potential significance of any particular verbal formulation unclear; risk of unfair prejudice outweighs any potential probative value irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; so lacking in context as to make the potential significance of any particular verbal formulation unclear; risk of unfair prejudice outweighs any potential probative value
5/11/05 Tr. 17:4-18:16
5/11/05 Tr. 24:2-7 5/11/05 Tr. 73:7-74:22
5/11/05 Tr. 82:2-83:3
5/11/05 Tr. 84:13-86:1
5/11/05 Tr. 175:15-18
5/11/05 Tr. 178:8-18
5/11/05 Tr. 183:22-25
omits question; omits portion of response; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; so lacking in context as to make the potential significance of any particular verbal formulation unclear; risk of unfair prejudice outweighs any potential probative value
-4-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 5 of 15
5/11/05 Tr. 187:2-188:7
irrelevant to any material issue;
5/11/05 Tr. 202:14-19
omits question; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented; omits question; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible irrelevant to any material issue
5/11/05 Tr. 219:24-221:2
5/12/05 Tr. 263:13-18
5/12/05 Tr. 408:7-19
5/12/05 Tr. 408:24-409:9
omits portion of question; irrelevant to any material issue exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking fact testimony in the course of an expert deposition; omits material portion of exchange; omits portion of last response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins mid-sentence in a response; ends mid-sentence in a question so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits beginning question; ends mid-sentence in a response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins mid-sentence in question; omits most of question; omits most of response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins mid-sentence in videographer's commentary; omits much of last response
5/13/05 Tr. 580:21-581:11
6/27/07 Tr. 7:6-9, 8:19-12:17
6/27/07 Tr. 28:6-11
6/27/07 Tr. 32:14-36:6
6/27/01 Tr. 55:4-13
6/27/01 Tr. 57:19-62:2
-5-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 6 of 15
6/27/01 Tr. 63:11-19
so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits all but one word of beginning question; ends in mid-question so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits opening question and most of opening response; ends midsentence in last response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits opening question and all but one word of opening response; ends mid-sentence in last response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins mid-sentence in opening question; ends mid-sentence in last response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins mid-sentence in opening question; ends with identification of examining counsel; exceeds the permissible scope of the deposition in seeking nonexpert testimony in the course of an expert deposition; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins with one-word response "Probably"; ends mid-sentence in last question; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; ends mid-sentence in last response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in response; mischaracterizes testimony; ends midsentence in question;
6/27/07 Tr. 65:17-68:4
6/27/07 Tr. 70:9-71:2
6/27/07 Tr. 71:12-72:11
6/27/07 Tr. 86:4-13
6/27/07 Tr. 87:16-19
6/27/07 Tr. 93:8-94:2
6/27/07 Tr. 94:19-95:2
6/27/07 Tr. 98:1-99:4
-6-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 7 of 15
6/27/07 Tr. 100:13-101:1
so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in response; ends midsentence in response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins with one word of initial question; ends mid-sentence in final response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits question; ends midsentence in response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits most of initial question; ends mid-sentence in last question; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins with one word response "Yes"; ends mid-sentence in next response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins mid-sentence in initial question; ends with next question; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in initial response; ends mid-sentence in subsequent response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; begins mid-sentence in initial question; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in initial response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; provides fragments of question and answer
6/27/07 Tr. 105:8-107:11
6/27/07 Tr. 107:18-22
6/27/07 Tr. 121:18-21
6/27/07 Tr. 122:16-123:5
6/27/07 Tr. 124:7-125:7
6/27/07 Tr. 131:14-132: 6
6/27/07 Tr. 134:8-135:8
6/27/07 Tr. 147:7-19
6/27/07 Tr. 154:4-10
-7-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 8 of 15
6/27/07 Tr. 155:10-157:5
so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; provides fragments of questions so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in initial response; ends mid-sentence in subsequent response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in initial response; ends mid-sentence in subsequent response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; includes only one line -"Either to the corporation or to the" -- of a 14-line response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits part of initial question; ends mid-sentence in subsequent question so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; ends mid-sentence in subsequent response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in response; ends with subsequent question so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; ends mid-sentence in response 222:18 to 223:4 are so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; witness merely confirms that he sees certain language in a document so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits part of initial question; ends mid-sentence in subsequent question
6/27/07 Tr. 180:5-14
6/27/07 Tr. 191:10-192:16
6/27/07 Tr. 198:9-14
6/27/07 Tr. 204:5-205:20
6/27/07 Tr. 212:12-213:1
6/27/07 Tr. 213:19-217:1
6/27/07 Tr. 218:17-22
6/27/07 Tr. 221:6-223:4
6/27/07 Tr. 223:17-20
-8-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 9 of 15
6/27/07 Tr. 238:2-239:3
so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits initial question; begins mid-sentence in response; ends with identification of examining counsel so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits portion of initial question; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits portion of initial question; omits portion of subsequent response so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits entire question; omits portion of response; omits portion of question; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; omits entire question; omits most of response; so lacking in context as to be incomprehensible; question refers to prior testimony and asks about the "things you were just describing"; irrelevant; question seeks opinion on a matter of law;
6/28/07 Tr. 294:2-295:7
6/28/07 Tr. 298:10-299:12
6/28/07 Tr. 300:17-301:3
6/28/07 Tr. 306:20-307:11 6/28/07 Tr. 314:10-13
6/28/07 Tr. 392:15-393:9
6/28/07 Tr. 462:15-463:1
B.
Objections to Defendant's Deposition Designations of Neil Murphy Objection irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented provides fragment of question; omits answer to last question; lacks context to the point that the excerpt is not understandable; irrelevant because addresses damages calculation that is not being presented
Transcript Citation 10/11/01 Tr. 58:16-60:7
10/11/01 Tr. 65:7-18
-9-
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 10 of 15
10/11/01 Tr. 138:22-139:1
provides only fragment of answer; lacks context to the point that excerpt is not understandable lacks context to the point that the excerpt is not understandable. irrelevant because excerpt addresses a damages model that is not being presented. omits question and provides only fragment of answer; lacks context to the point that excerpt is not understandable omits question, provides fragment of answer; lacks context to the point that excerpt is not understandable omits question; lacks context to the point that excerpt is not understandable provides only fragment of answer omits question, provides fragment of answer lacks context to the point that the excerpt is not understandable omits question, provides fragment of answer lacks context to the point that excerpt is not understandable lacks context to the point that excerpt is not understandable; irrelevant because addresses damages theory not being presented
10/11/01 Tr. 168:23-169:6
10/12/01 Tr. 226:2-227:2
10/12/01 Tr. 249:23-25
10/12/01 Tr. 256:14-257:7
10/12/01 Tr. 260:22-261:8
10/12/01 Tr. 261:20-23 10/12/01 Tr. 265:2-266:25 10/12/01 Tr. 267:4-8
10/12/01 Tr. 272:1-273:1 10/12/01 Tr. 275:2-11
10/12/01 Tr. 321:18-322:10
C.
Objections to Defendant's Deposition Designations of Lynn Stokes Objection omits question and most of answer omits question and most of answer omits context to the point that excerpt makes
Transcript Citation 10/22/01 Tr. 137:14-17 10/22/01 Tr. 149:12-17 10/22/01 Tr. 165:16 - 166:8
- 10 -
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 11 of 15
no sense; irrelevant because addresses quantification of damages from perspective of Holland and Ross rather than First Bank. 10/23/01 Tr. 198:9-14 omits question and most of answer; also omits context to the point that excerpt makes no sense. lacks context to the point that excerpt makes no sense.
10/23/01 Tr. 250:1-251:5
Plaintiffs further object to the Defendant's designations of excerpts from the deposition of Lynn Stokes to the extent that Defendant has failed to include the errata sheet corrections corresponding to the relevant excerpts. The errata sheets from Lyn n Stokes' deposition are attached hereto as Exhibit 1. II. Counter-Designations to Defendant's Deposition Excerpts A. Counter-Designations from the Deposition Testimony of Homer Holland Assuming Defendant's counter-designations are admitted in whole or in part, Plaintiffs respectfully request the following testimony from Homer Holland obtained in this case on October 31, 2001; November 1, 2001; November 2, 2001; May 11, 2005; May 12, 2005; June 27, 2007; and June 28, 2007, be admitted. From the October 31, 2001 deposition transcript: 8:8-9:11; 11:2-22; 21:18-37:4; 39:16-41:11. From the November 1, 2001 deposition transcript: 206:8-207:3 (only if 205:11-206:7 are admitted); 212:5-213:9 (only if 210:20212:4 are admitted); 222:15-24; 241:15-25 (only if 242:1-4 are admitted). From the November 2, 2001 deposition transcript: 316:1-6 (only if 316:7-12 are admitted); 316:13-317:20 (only if 316:7-12 are admitted); 319:14-320:14 (only if 319:18-22 are admitted); 326:20-331:3 (only if 329 4-6
- 11 -
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 12 of 15
are admitted); 384:5-23 (only if 382:20-384:4 are admitted); 395:3-14 and 396:18-397:1 (only if 395:17-24 admitted). From the May 11, 2005 deposition transcript: 157:24-159:6 (only if 157:16-23 are admitted); 183:17-21 and 184:1-3 (only if 183:22-25 are admitted); 202:11-13 and 207:4-19 (only if 202:14-19 are admitted). From the May 12, 2005 deposition transcript: 262:18-263:12 (only if 263:13-18 are admitted); 408:20-25 (only if 408:24-409:9 are admitted). From the June 27, 2007 deposition transcript (only if adjacent material in defendant's motion is admitted): 7:17-8:18; 28:1-14; 32:4-13 and 36:7; 54:18-55:19; 64:5-65:16 and 68:5-68:11; 69:17-70:8; 71:10-72:14; 85:22-86:5; 87:3-12; 93:19-94:3; 94:14-18; 97:15-98:4; 99:315; 99:21-101:2; 105:7-107:12; 107:15-108:4; 121:17-122:7; 122:13-123:9; 124:5125:12; 131:8-132:8; 134:7-134:17; 146:14-147:10; 154:3-11; 155:6-157:14; 180:2-19; 190:7-192:18; 198:10-199:5; 212:6-213:4; 213:6-217:1; 218:14-219:3; 223:16-224:3; 237:15-19; 238:1-5. From the June 28, 2007 deposition transcript (except as noted, all proffered only if adjacent material in defendant's motion is admitted): 293:21-294:3; 298:19-299:20; 300:9-301:3; 311:14-312:1; 313:16-315:2; 333:21334:14 (if 314:10-13 admitted). These excerpts are attached hereto as Exhibit 2. B. Counter-Designations from the Deposition Testimony of Neil Murphy
Assuming Defendant's counter-designations are admitted in whole or in part, Plaintiffs respectfully request the following testimony from Neil Murphy obtained in this - 12 -
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 13 of 15
case on October 11, 2001 and October 12, 2001, be admitted: Tr. 11:20-23; 14:17-15:7; 15:17-16:21; 23:18-24:5; 25:12-25; 26:1-14; 54:6-15; 58:4-15; 197:15-17; 238:18-239:6; 243:12-243:20; 352:25 - 353:21. These excerpts are attached hereto as Exhibit 3. C. Counter-Designations from the Deposition Testimony of Lynn Stokes
Assuming Defendant's counter-designations are admitted in whole or in part, Plaintiffs respectfully request the following testimony from Lynn Stokes obtained in this case on October 22, 2001, and October 23, 2001, be admitted: Tr. 108:12-21; 244:17-21, 271:18-23, 282:18-283:19. These excerpts are attached hereto as Exhibit 4.
- 13 -
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 14 of 15
Respectfully submitted, /s/ David B. Bergman David B. Bergman ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004-1206 (202) 942-5000 (tel.) (202) 942-5999 (fax) Counsel for Plaintiffs Holland and Ross and First Bank
Of Counsel: Melvin C. Garbow Howard N. Cayne Michael A. Johnson Joshua P. Wilson ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004-1206 Co-counsel for First Bank: Donald J. Gunn, Jr., Esq. Sharon R. Wice, Esq. Gunn and Gunn First Bank Building Creve Coeur 11901 Olive Blvd., Suite 312 P.O. Box 419002 St. Louis, Missouri 63141 (314) 432-4550 (tel.) (314) 432-4489 (fax)
Dated: November 20, 2007
- 14 -
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 15 of 15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 20th day of November 2007, I caused the foregoing PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS TO DEFENDANT'S EXPERT WITNESS DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS to be filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system.
Dated: November 20, 2007
/s/ Joshua P. Wilson Joshua P. Wilson
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 1 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 2 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 3 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 4 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 5 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 6 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 7 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 8 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 1 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 2 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 3 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 4 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 5 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 6 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 7 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 8 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 9 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 10 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 11 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 12 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 13 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 14 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 15 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 16 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 17 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 18 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 19 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 20 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 21 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 22 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 23 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 24 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 25 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 26 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 27 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 28 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 29 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 30 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 31 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 32 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 33 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 34 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 35 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 36 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 37 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 38 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 39 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 40 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 41 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 42 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 43 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 44 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 45 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 46 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 47 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 48 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 49 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 50 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 51 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 52 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 53 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 54 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 55 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 56 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 57 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 58 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 59 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 60 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 61 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 62 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 63 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 64 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 65 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 66 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 67 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 68 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 69 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 70 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 71 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 72 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 73 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 74 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 75 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 76 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 77 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 78 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 79 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 80 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 81 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 82 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 83 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 84 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 85 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 86 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 87 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 88 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 89 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 90 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 91 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 92 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 93 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 94 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 95 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 96 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 97 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 98 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 99 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 100 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 101 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 102 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 103 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 104 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 105 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 106 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 107 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 108 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 109 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 110 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 111 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 112 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 113 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 114 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 115 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 116 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 117 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 118 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 119 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 120 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 121 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 122 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 123 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 124 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 125 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 126 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 127 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 128 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 129 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 130 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 131 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 132 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 133 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-3
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 134 of 134
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 1 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 2 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 3 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 4 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 5 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 6 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 7 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 8 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 9 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 10 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 11 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 12 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 13 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 14 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 15 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 16 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 17 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 18 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-4
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 19 of 19
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 1 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 2 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 3 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 4 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 5 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 6 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 7 of 8
Case 1:95-cv-00524-GWM
Document 437-5
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 8 of 8