Free Motion to Dismiss - Rule 41(b) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 26.9 kB
Pages: 3
Date: March 30, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 449 Words, 2,850 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/11542/75.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - Rule 41(b) - District Court of Federal Claims ( 26.9 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - Rule 41(b) - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:96-cv-00700-LB

Document 75

Filed 03/30/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS APACHE APARTMENT OF OWATONA, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 96-700C (Judge Block)

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS NEW GOLDENDALE HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND NEW HOWARD LAKE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN ORDER OF THIS COURT Defendant, the United States, respectfully requests that the Court dismiss the claims of plaintiffs New Goldendale Homes Limited Partnership and New Howard Lake Limited Partnership for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's December 22, 2005 order. Rule 41(b) of the Rules of the United

States Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC") provides for dismissal upon failure of a plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with any order of the Court. On December 22, 2005, the Court ordered that

plaintiffs file their Proposed Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law by March 28, 2006. Although a Plaintiffs' Proposed Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law was filed with the Court on March 28, 2006, that filing does not mention New Goldendale Homes Limited Partnership or New Howard Lake Limited Partnership. Because that

filing does not propose any facts or conclusions of law relating

Case 1:96-cv-00700-LB

Document 75

Filed 03/30/2006

Page 2 of 3

to New Goldendale Homes Limited Partnership or New Howard Lake Limited Partnership, those plaintiffs have failed to prosecute their claims and have failed to comply with the Court's December 22, 2005 order. Consequently, the claims of those

plaintiffs should be dismissed. For these reasons, the Court should dismiss the claims of New Goldendale Homes Limited Partnership or New Howard Lake Limited Partnership, pursuant to RCFC 41(b). Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/Brian M. Simkin BRIAN M. SIMKIN Assistant Director s/Timothy P. McIlmail TIMOTHY P. MCILMAIL Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 514-4325 Facsimile: (202) 514-7965 March 30, 2006 Attorneys for Defendant

2

Case 1:96-cv-00700-LB

Document 75

Filed 03/30/2006

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on March 30, 2006 the foregoing Defendant's Motion To Dismiss The Claims Of Plaintiffs New Goldendale Homes Limited Partnership And New Howard Lake Limited Partnership For Failure To Prosecute And Failure To Comply With An Order Of This Court was filed electronically. I understand

that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. access this filing through the Court's system. Parties may

s/Timothy P. McIlmail