Free Joint Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 26.9 kB
Pages: 4
Date: September 5, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 783 Words, 5,008 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/1212/90.pdf

Download Joint Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims ( 26.9 kB)


Preview Joint Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:01-cv-00161-GWM

Document 90

Filed 09/05/2006

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ____________________________________ THOMAS PATTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

No.-01-161C (Judge Miller)

JOINT CERTIFICATION OF MEETING OF COUNSEL The parties, by and through counsel, and in accordance with paragraph 13(d) of Appendix A to the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("Appendix A"), hereby file this Joint Certification and state as follows: 1. On August 24, 2006, Richard D. Heideman, counsel for the Plaintiff, and Lauren Moore, counsel for the Defendant, conducted by telephone the meeting of counsel required by paragraph 13 of Appendix A. 2. The parties exchanged by facsimile their lists of all exhibits expected to be used at trial for case-in-chief or rebuttal purposes, as well as copies of all exhibits that had not been previously exchanged, in accordance with paragraph 13(a). 3. The parties also exchanged by facsimile their lists of witnesses who may be called at trial for case-in-chief or rebuttal purposes, including each witness's contact information and the expected subject matter of their testimony, pursuant to paragraph 13(b). 4. As required by paragraph 13(c), at the meeting of counsel the parties discussed the following:

1

Case 1:01-cv-00161-GWM

Document 90

Filed 09/05/2006

Page 2 of 4

a. Plaintiff's counsel disclosed his intention to file a motion for leave to file a transcript of the deposition of John Donohue should Mr. Donohue become unavailable to testify in court. b. Counsel for the parties reconvened their meeting on Monday, August 28, 2006, after reviewing their respective witness and exhibit lists, to "[r]esolve, if possible, any objections to the admission of testimony (including deposition testimony) or exhibits." Paragraph 13(c)(2) of Appendix A. The parties also agreed that all exhibits would be deemed authenticated and admissible for trial purposes with the exception of the damages calculation chart listed as exhibit number 13 on Plaintiff's Anticipated Exhibit List to which the Defendant objects on the grounds that it is a summary under Fed. R. Evid. 1006. c. Counsel for the parties agreed that all contentions to applicable facts and law had been previously disclosed and fully briefed in the parties' previous filings with the Court, subject to updating as a result of the additional discovery taken since said filings. d. The parties agreed to draft a joint document as to stipulations of fact which the parties believe are undisputed for the purposes of trial. e. Counsel for the parties considered, and decided against, submitting the case to the Court for resolution on the basis of a documentary record alone, in favor of proceeding to trial as scheduled for October 16, 2006. Counsels' determination was based on the Court's statements during the status conference held on August 3, 2006.

2

Case 1:01-cv-00161-GWM

Document 90

Filed 09/05/2006

Page 3 of 4

f. Plaintiff's counsel suggested a settlement which would include, among other things, continued work by the Plaintiff for the FBI. Defendant's counsel rejected this request and declined to propose the suggestion to the FBI. Defense counsel also rejected Plaintiff's counsel's request for Plaintiff's counsel to contact the FBI in order to discuss the possibility of the FBI engaging the Plaintiff to do future work with the appropriate FBI officials during the pendency of this case. g. Plaintiff's counsel also suggested with regard to settlement that the parties submit the case to Court-supervised mediation prior to the scheduled trial date, however Defendant's counsel also rejected this suggestion. Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 5, 2006 PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/ Kathryn A. Bleecker KATHRYN A. BLEECKER Assistant Director /s/ Richard D. Heideman RICHARD D. HEIDEMAN HEIDEMAN NUDELMAN & KALIK, PC 1146 19th Street, N.W. Fifth Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 Tele: (202) 463-1818 Facsimile: (202) 463-2999 s/ Lauren S. Moore LAUREN S. MOORE Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit, 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 616-0333 Facsimile: (202) 514-8640 Attorneys for Defendant

Attorney for Plaintiff

3

Case 1:01-cv-00161-GWM

Document 90

Filed 09/05/2006

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this the 5th day of September 2006, a copy of the foregoing was served electronically through the United States Court of Federal Claims' ECF Filing System to: Peter D. Keisler David M. Cohen Kathryn A. Bleecker Lauren S. Moore Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit, 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 616-0333 Facsimile: (202) 514-8640 Attorneys for Defendant

________/s/ Richard D. Heideman_______