Free Motion to Strike - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS _________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) CAROLE AND ROBERT TESTWUIDE, et. al.,

No.: 01-201L Judge Victor J. Wolski

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION AND EXHIBITS OF CURTIS A. UTZ COME NOW the Plaintiffs, Carole and Robert Testwuide, et. al., by counsel, and hereby move to strike from Defendant's Reply Memorandum the declaration of Curtis A. Utz and all exhibits connected to his declaration, upon the grounds that the submission constitutes a new matter, not previously raised in Defendant's opening memorandum. Dated: June 15, 2006 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jack E. Ferrebee Jack E. Ferrebee Hofheimer/Ferrebee, P.C. 1060 Laskin Road, Suite 12B Virginia Beach, VA 23451 (757) 452-5200 Counsel for Plaintiffs Of Counsel: Kieron F. Quinn Martin E. Wolf Quinn, Gordon & Wolf, Chtd. 40 West Chesapeake Avenue Suite 408 Towson, Maryland 21204 (410) 825-2300 [email protected] [email protected]

1

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 2

Kristen Hofheimer Charles R. Hofheimer Hofheimer/Ferrebee, P.C. 1060 Laskin Road, Suite 12-B Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451 (757) 425-5200 [email protected] [email protected] Stephen C. Swain Thomas Shuttleworth Lawrence Woodward Shuttleworth, Ruloff, Giordano & Swain 4525 South Boulevard Suite 300 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 (757) 671-6000 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike the Declaration and Exhibits of Curtis Utz was sent electronically this 15th day June 2006 to counsel of record, as follows: STEVEN D. BRYANT Environment & Natural Resources Division Department of Justice 601 D Street, N.W., Rm. 3205 Washington, D.C. 20004 /s/Jack E. Ferrebee Jack E. Ferrebee

2

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-2

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS _________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) CAROLE AND ROBERT TESTWUIDE, et. al.,

No.: 01-201L Judge Victor J. Wolski

PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE DECLARATION AND EXHIBITS OF CURTIS A. UTZ Plaintiffs submit the following memorandum in support of the Motion to Strike the Declaration and Exhibits of Curtis A. Utz appended to Defendant's reply memorandum as Exhibit M. Preliminary Statement As set forth in Plaintiffs' pending motion for sanctions, Plaintiffs have, through discovery and correspondence, repeatedly requested that the Defendant identify the date it claims the six year statute of limitations began to run. Defendant declined to do so for the past five years, contending that it needed more time to study the issue. In its April 28, 2006 opening memorandum in support of summary judgment, Defendant, for the first time, identified 1981 as the date. It has based its assertion wholly upon the total number of operations in 1981, a number it has had in its possession from the beginning of this proceeding. In June 2001, Plaintiffs propounded the following discovery to the Defendant:

1

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-2

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 6

1. NAS Oceana and NALF Fentress annual operations. For each year since and including 1975, state the number and type of operations at NAS Oceana and NALF Fentress for each aircraft category operating at those airfields during that year in the format set out in Exhibit A hereto [from Table A-3 Airfield and Airspace Analysis, dated February 18, 1998 by ATAC Corporation]. 2. Identify each form, record or document which, in the ordinary course, would report all or some of the operations set out in Exhibit A hereto: a) monthly b) quarterly c) annually 3. State the date on which you allege that a six year statute of limitations began to run as asserted in Paragraph 2 of your Affirmative Defenses. 1. DOCUMENT REQUESTS 5. All documents that identify the number and type of operations at Oceana for each aircraft category operating there during each respective year since 1975. 32. All documents that identify the number and type of aircraft stationed at Oceana since 1975. (EXHIBIT 1).

Following receipt of Defendant's April 28, 2006 memorandum, Plaintiffs' counsel sent Defendant a letter, dated May 12, 2006, pointing out that the base loading figures (number and type of aircraft) for the period following 1975, including 1981, had not been produced. (EXHIBIT 2). Defendant responded on May 16, 2006. Included in its response was a CD containing "projected allowances" for the end of FY 1981. (EXHIBIT 3). On May 19, 2006, Plaintiffs' counsel again wrote Defendant expressing concern that the documents contained on the CD were not base loading reports for aircraft

2

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-2

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 6

actually onboard at N.A.S. Oceana.

Examples of base loading reports previously

produced by Defendant for the 1990s are attached. (EXHIBIT 4). On May 23, 2006, Defendant responded, asserting that the documents contained in the CDs reflect "the number and types of aircraft located and operating as part of NAS Oceana-based squadrons from 1978 to 1988..." Attached to the response, were five CDs containing "Naval Aeronautical Organization" reports for the same years. (EXHIBIT 5). Certain documents contained in the May 23, 2006 production were omitted from the Curtis Utz declaration. They are: 1. A July 13, 1981 memorandum regarding the April 1981 Naval Aeronautical Organization, explaining that "[o]n board estimates are submitted by air stations and facilities a month or two in advance. Detailed accounting of aircraft in storage or undergoing rework at Naval Air Rework Facilities can be obtained from the Blue Book." (emphasis added) (EXHIBIT 6). 2. A June 8, 1982 memorandum concerning the April 1982 Naval Aeronautical Organization, reporting that there were 40 F-4 Phantoms on board at N.A.S. Oceana in April 1982; (EXHIBIT 7). 3. A November 24, 1982 memorandum concerning the October 1982 Naval Aeronautical Organization, reporting that there were 44 F-4 Phantoms on board at N.A.S. Oceana. (EXHIBIT 8). The last page of Exhibit L from Defendant's reply memorandum demonstrates that there was not a single F-4 Phantom operation at N.A.S. Oceana in 1982. Defendant has not produced any documents showing which aircraft performed FCLPs, touch and

3

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-2

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 4 of 6

goes in 1981 or how many were performed in that year. In fact, Defendant admitted in its May 16, 2006 letter that it does not have the operation counts for each type of operation at NAS Oceana in 1981. (EXHIBIT 3) Argument The function of a reply memorandum supporting a motion for summary judgment is to respond to the memorandum of the non-moving party, not to introduce new matters or evidence. A number of courts have addressed the issue. By way of example, in Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin Gmbh, 307 F.Supp.2d 2, 10 (D.D.C. 2004), the Court found that the introduction of new matters in a reply memorandum invited a sur-reply by the non-moving party. In Groobert v. President and Directors of Georgetown College, 219 F.Supp.2d 1, 13 (D.D.C. 2002), the Court found that introducing a new matter in reply invites a sur-reply. Similarly, in Provenz v. Miller, 201 F.3d 1478, 1483 (9th Cir. 1996), the Court found that the non-moving party should be given an opportunity to respond when new matters are raised in a reply memorandum. Here, Defendant has introduced evidence in its reply memorandum that it not only did not raise in its opening memorandum, but withheld from Plaintiffs from June 2001 until May 23, 2006, just seven days before Plaintiffs' memorandum in opposition was due. By producing documents five years after they should have been produced and on the eve of Plaintiffs' memorandum in response to the motion for summary judgment, Defendant has placed Plaintiffs at an unfair disadvantage. The disadvantage to Plaintiffs was compounded by Defendant's use of the numbers for the first time in its reply memorandum. Not only were these records produced on the eve of the due date for

4

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-2

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 5 of 6

Plaintiffs' memorandum, they were produced after the close of discovery, after the close of the naming of witnesses (including experts), and after the filing of the motion for summary judgment. If permitted to stand, the selective use of those documents by Defendant implies that there were F-4 Phantoms flying numerous FCLPs and touch and goes over the test case Plaintiffs' homes in 1981. The total package of documents produced on May 23, 2006 reveal two things: (1) that an "estimated" number of F-4s were sitting at the N.A.S. Oceana facility in 1981; and (2) that of 40 F-4s "estimated" to be at N.A.S. Oceana in April 1982 and the 44 "estimated" to be there in October 1982, not one flew a single reported operation during the entire year. The F-4 Phantom was either not at Oceana at all in the year it was reported to be part of the estimated inventory of aircraft or it simply sat on the ground. In either case, it had no noise impact on the community. Defendant has not provided a single document for 1981 demonstrating that a single F-4 flew a single operation at N.A.S. Oceana. Under the circumstances, simply reporting it to be in the inventory of aircraft is misleading. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the declaration of Curtis Utz, and all exhibits attached to his declaration, be stricken.

Dated: June 15, 2006

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jack E. Ferrebee Jack E. Ferrebee Hofheimer/Ferrebee, P.C. 1060 Laskin Road, Suite 12B Virginia Beach, VA 23451 (757) 452-5200 Counsel for Plaintiffs

5

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-2

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 6 of 6

Of Counsel: Kieron F. Quinn Martin E. Wolf Quinn, Gordon & Wolf, Chtd. 40 West Chesapeake Avenue Suite 408 Towson, Maryland 21204 (410) 825-2300 [email protected] [email protected] Kristen Hofheimer Charles R. Hofheimer Hofheimer/Ferrebee, P.C. 1060 Laskin Road, Suite 12-B Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451 (757) 425-5200 [email protected] [email protected] Stephen C. Swain Thomas Shuttleworth Lawrence Woodward Shuttleworth, Ruloff, Giordano & Swain 4525 South Boulevard Suite 300 Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 (757) 671-6000 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Motion to Strike was sent electronically this 15th day June 2006 to counsel of record, as follows: STEVEN D. BRYANT Environment & Natural Resources Division Department of Justice 601 D Street, N.W., Rm. 3205 Washington, D.C. 20004 /s/Jack E. Ferrebee Jack E. Ferrebee

6

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 4 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 5 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 6 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 7 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 8 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 9 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-3

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 10 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-4

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-4

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 2

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 9

U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division SDB 90-1-23-10297
Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 663 Washington, DC 20044-0663 Telephone (202) 305-0424 Facsimile (202) 305-0267

May 16, 2006 Via E-mail and Federal Express Jack E. Ferrebee, Esquire Hofheimer/Ferrebee, P.C. 1060 Laskin Road Suite 12B Sandpiper Key Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451-6365 Re: Dear Jack: This responds to your May 12, 2006 letter regarding plaintiffs' Request for Production ("RFP") No. 32 from the class certification phase of the litigation and requesting additional information regarding 1981 operations. First, contrary to the assertion in your letter, defendant has not intentionally withheld its response to Interrogatory No. 2 from the class certification stage. Second, I am perplexed at the implication in your letter that we had an obligation to provide you a supplemental response to RFP 32. In neither Kieron Quinn's June 7, 2004 letter nor Marty Wolf's June 21, 2004 e-mail, discussing renewal of discovery from the class certification phase of the litigation, did plaintiffs renew RFP 32. Nor have you mentioned RFP 32 at all in the more than two years since then. We therefore view your request to resurrect RFP 32 as untimely. Nevertheless, as a courtesy to you, we are providing responsive documents. The enclosed CD contains responsive documents from the period you requested, 1978 to 1988 (OCE239467-616). Additionally, the 1978 AESO noise study (OCE 039712, Doc. ID No. 2227) provides base loading information, albeit for 1977. Concerning your request for "the counts for each type of operation at [NAS] Oceana in 1981", we have not been able to identify any responsive documents. Testwuide v. United States, 01-201

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 4 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 5 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 6 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 7 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 8 of 9

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-5

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 9 of 9

The enclosed CD also contains supplemental responsive documents to RFP 29 (OCE239617-655) and RFP 33 (OCE239656-694).

Sincerely, s// Steven D. Bryant Steven D. Bryant

-2-

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 4 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 5 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 6 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 7 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-6

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 8 of 8

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-7

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 2

U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division SDB 90-1-23-10297
Natural Resources Section P.O. Box 663 Washington, DC 20044-0663 Telephone (202) 305-0424 Facsimile (202) 305-0267

May 23, 2006 Via E-mail and Federal Express Jack E. Ferrebee, Esquire Hofheimer/Ferrebee, P.C. 1060 Laskin Road Suite 12B Sandpiper Key Virginia Beach, Virginia 23451-6365 Re: Dear Jack: This responds to your May 19, 2006 letter regarding plaintiffs' Request for Production ("RFP") No. 32 from the class certification phase of the litigation. For clarification, the documents I provided you last week are not simply base loading "projections." Rather, the excerpted documents bates-stamped OCE239467-616 also reflect the number and types of aircraft located and operating as part of NAS Oceana-based squadrons from 1978 to 1988, the specific years you requested in your May 12, 2006 letter. Under the "Inventory" section of the "Inventory and Operating Allowances" tables, please see the "Operating Status" column for the number and type of each type of aircraft in each of the relevant squadrons at NAS Oceana at the time of the report. This table includes the physical location of the aircraft if it was part of an Oceana-based squadron but was, at the time of the report, deployed elsewhere. In your letter, you have now expanded the request for base loading documents from 1975 to the present. While we object to your request for discovery beyond the deadline, we are as a courtesy enclosing a series of CDs that contain the complete "Allowances and Locations" reports for the period beginning in 1969 and continuing through 1988 (this report ceased publication in 1988) and another series of CDs that contain the Naval Aeronautical Organization reports for the period beginning in Fiscal year 1969 and continuing through Fiscal Year 1998. I am also sending you separately by e-mail these reports for Fiscal years 1998-2001. Testwuide v. United States, 01-201

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-7

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 2

With regard to the redacted privileged communications from OCE239617, we will provide you with a privilege log shortly.

Sincerely, s// Steven D. Bryant Steven D. Bryant

-2-

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 4 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 5 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 6 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 7 of 10

UNCLASSIFIED
OPNAVNOTE C 5 4 0 0

The p l a n n e d Naval A v i a t i o n Shore E s t a b l i s h m e n t , i n c l u d i n g K a r i n e a c t i v i t i e s , f o r I A p r i l 1 9 8 1 i s r e f l e c t e d i n t h e a s s i g n e d m i s s i o n s of i n d i v i d u a l a c t i v i t i e s . These m i s s i o n s are p r o m u l g a t e d and r e v i s e d by t h e OPNAV N o t i c e 5450 s e r i e s . A s d i r e c t e d by OPNAV I n s t r u c t i o n 5450.171, it is t h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y of Echelon 2 Commanders t o p r o m u l g a t e f u n c t i o n s and t a s k s f o r each a c t i v i t y under t h e i r command i n s u p p o r t o f t h e a s s i g n e d m i s s i o n . NAVAIR I n s t r u c t i o n series 5451 c o n t a i n s a l i s t o f approved t a s k s f o r each a c t i v i t y under Naval A i r Systems Command. Permanent d u t y s t a t i o n s o f Naval u n i t s a r e c o n t a i n e d i n t h e e f f e c t i v e e d i t i o n o f OPNAV I n s t r u c t i o n 3111.14. AIRCRAFT ON BOARD STATIONS O p e r a t i n g a l l o w a n c e s , and i n v e n t o r y by u n i t and model a r e p u b l i s h e d semia n n u a l l y i n OPNAV NOTICE C3110 ( B l u e Book). Base a i r c r a f t d a t a c o n t a i n e d i n t h i s Notice r e f l e c t an on board ( i n c l u d i n g home b a s e d e p l o y e d ) c o u n t a s of t h e d a t e o f t h e c o v e r i n g l e t t e r (1 A p r i l o r 1 O c t o b e r ) . On board estimates are s u b m i t t e d by a i r s t a t i o n s and f a c i l i t i e s a month or two i n advance. D e t a i l e d a c c o u n t i n g o f a i r c r a f t i n s t o r a g e or undergoing rework a t Naval A i r Rework F a c i l i t i e s c a n be o b t a i n e d from t h e Blue Book.
NAVY MANPOWER ALLOCATION

T a b l e s on p a g e s 5-10 o f t h i s p u b l i c a t i o n i n c l u d e a F i s c a l 1 9 8 1 summary of t h e p e r s o n n e l a l l o c a t i o n s f o r a v i a t i o n a c t i v i t i e s a s o f 1 A p r i l 1981. P e r s o n n e l f i g u r e s shown f o r t h e i n d i v i d u a l s t a t i o n s and a c t i v i t i e s r e f l e c t an e s t i m a t e d on b o a r d c o u n t a s o f 1 A p r i l 1981. E s t i m a t e s are p r e p a r e d w i t h i n a month o r two of the 1 April date. P e r s o n n e l d a t a Eor USNR/USMCR s q u a d r o n s / u n i t s r e p r e s e n t numbers allowed i n d r i l l .pay s t a t u s . A c t i v e d u t y p e r s o n n e l (TARS and USN) a s s o c i a t e d w i t h Reserve. a c t i v i t i e s a r e shown s e p a r a t e l y . C M A D OVER SHORE ACTIVITIES O MN The e x e r c i s e o f command o v e r a s h o r e ( f i e l d ) a c t i v i t y h a s as its p r i m a r y p u r p o s e t h e p r o v i s i o n o f e f f e c t i v e s u p p o r t t o t h e f o r c e s of t h e United S t a t e s Navy and o f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s Marine Corps. It encompasses o v e r - a l l a u t h o r i t y , d i r e c t i o n , c o n t r o l and c o o r d i n a t i o n n e c e s s a r y t o c a r r y o u t t h e a s s i g n e d m i s s i o n , It includes and r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e o p e r a t i n g e f f i c i e n c y of t h e a c t i v i t y . a u t h o r i t y and r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r m i s s i o n p l a n n i n g , s h o r e a c t i v i t y p l a n n i n g and It a l s o i n c l u d e s a u t h o r i t y and r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r workload p l a n n i n g . c o o r d i n a t i o n t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e v a r i o u s e l e m e n t s of s u p p o r t . Mission and f a c i l i t i e s p l a n n i n g f o r s h o r e ( f i e l d ) a c t i v i t i e s s h a l l be accomplished w i t h t h e g u i d a n c e and a s s i s t a n c e o f commands, b u r e a u s and o f f i c e s a s s i g n e d s u p p o r t r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s , and w i t h t h e t e c h n i c a l a d v i c e o f o t h e r commands, b u r e a u s and o f f i c e s . A d m i n i s t r a t i v e and t e c h n i c a l g u i d a n c e s h a l l i n c l u d e : a. The e s t a b l i s h m e n t o f st'andards and p r o c e d u r e s f o r s p e c i a l i z e d administrative o r technical functions; b.
c.
'..ras

P r o f e s s i o n a l and t e c h n i c a l a d v i c e , g u i d a n c e , and a s s i s t a n c e ; Performance of s p e c i a l i z e d a d m i n i s t r a t i v e o r t e c h n i c a l f u n c t i o n s a s a

service. S u p e r v i s i o n by S t a f f A s s i s t a n t s o v e r a s s i g n e d s h o r e ( f i e l d ) a c t i v i t i e s encompasses t h e same d e g r e e o f a u t h o r i t y and r e s p o n s i b i l i t y a s command. (SECNAVINST 5 4 0 0 . 1 4 )

UNCLASSIFIED

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 8 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 9 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-8

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 10 of 10

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-9

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-9

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-9

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 3

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-10

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 1 of 4

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-10

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 2 of 4

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-10

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 3 of 4

Case 1:01-cv-00201-VJW

Document 184-10

Filed 06/15/2006

Page 4 of 4