Free Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 31.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: September 13, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 260 Words, 1,835 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13048/238.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims ( 31.8 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00484-JPW

Document 238

Filed 09/13/2005

Page 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 98-484C Filed: September 13, 2005 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

NORTHERN STATES POWER CO., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

_________________________________________________________ ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF EXPERT REPORTS and DEFERRING RULING ON DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION __________________________________________________________ As discussed during the telephonic status conference held this date, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's August 1, 2005, motion for leave to file expert reports under seal is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file these reports electronically. The expert reports, titled (1) Assessment of Damages, Northern States Power's Spent Nuclear Fuel Claim; (2) Expert Report Regarding Determination of the U.S. Department of Energy's Overall Spent Nuclear Fuel Acceptance Rate; and (3) Expert Report Regarding Spent Nuclear Fuel Acceptance Rights for Northern States Power Company's Prairie Island and Monticello Plants, shall constitute plaintiff's response to the court's orders of March 3 and 30, 2005, directing plaintiff to file a "claim letter" identifying all costs that plaintiff is seeking to recover in this action. The filing of these expert reports shall be without prejudice to defendant's right at trial to challenge the qualifications of the experts and the admissibility of their testimony.

Case 1:98-cv-00484-JPW

Document 238

Filed 09/13/2005

Page 2 of 2

2. The court defers ruling on defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment regarding pre-breach and future damages pending the parties' consideration of the Federal Circuit's recent decision in Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United States, No. 04-5122 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 9, 2005).

s/John P. Wiese John P. Wiese Judge

2