Free Notice (Other) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:98-cv-00488-SGB

Document 373-3

Filed 08/22/2006

Page 1 of 1

Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. The United States Revised Table A: Summary of Total Costs with Adjustments per the Court's Order [1]

Outside Services Labor "New 16 Employees" [3] Indirect Labor re "New 16 Employees" [3] Materials Materials Surcharge Other Non Cash Corporate Allocation Misc. Work Orders Total Costs

1/1/92 - 4/30/97 [2] 5/1/97 - 5/31/97 [2] 6/1/97 - 10/31/99 11/1/99 - 12/31/03 $ 10,146,644 $ (300,286) $ 9,375,646 $ 35,144,485 861,806 33,679 1,127,500 3,849,361 506,300 19,377 568,562 3,357,017 11,863 307,055 847,309 317,472 1,720 42,528 29,595 (833,363) 45,329 (33,553) 985,841 (1,220,964) 1,111,830 175,592 2,125 $ 15,467,706 $ (188,317) $ 11,563,329 $ 39,637,752

[4]

Total Costs 54,366,489 5,872,347 1,094,238 4,523,244 391,314 164,254 (1,220,964) 1,289,547 $ 66,480,470 $

Notes:
[1]

This table differs from the Summary of Total Costs presented in PX 1000 because the following items have been adjusted per the Court's Order dated March 31, 2006:

1. Direct labor only includes costs attributable to the "New 16 employees" who charged the majority of their time to the dual-purpose dry storage project. 2. Indirect labor only includes costs attributable to the "New 16 employees" before 11/1/99, a period in which there was no dispute between the financial experts as to their inclusion. 3. The category Indirect Labor after 11/1/99 (totaling $1,933,088) has been removed, along with the category Corporate Allocation (totaling $676,922), in accordance with the Court's Order relating to the exclusion of "Other Overhead Costs."
[2]

The Court's March 31, 2006 Order Requesting Supplemental Expert Testimony specifies the time periods 1/1/92 - 5/14/97 and 5/15/97 - 5/31/97.

FMIS data (all data prior to 11/1/99) does not include the month, day and year of each charge (FMIS only provides the month and year of each charge). Therefore, a month end cut off at April 30 and May 31 was used.
[3]

Includes total labor for the "New 16 employees" for the entire time period. Includes Indirect labor for the "New 16 employees" prior to 11/1/99, a period in which Subtracted $6,514 from Outside Services based on Stipulated Adjustments to Table A of $4,139 related to Harriet Anderson and $2,375 related to Packaging Technology.

there is no dispute between the financial experts as to their inclusion.
[4]