Free Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 62.5 kB
Pages: 15
Date: May 7, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 2,845 Words, 18,181 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13163/239.pdf

Download Answer - District Court of Federal Claims ( 62.5 kB)


Preview Answer - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING, COMPANY; ALABAMA POWER COMPANY; and GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 98-614C (Senior Judge Merow)

DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT For its answer to the first amended complaint that plaintiffs, Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Alabama Power Company and Georgia Power Company, filed on October 8, 2002, defendant admits, denies, and alleges as follows: 1. The allegations contained in the first and second

sentences of paragraph 1 are conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Denies the allegations contained in the third

sentence of paragraph 1 for lack of information or knowledge sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 2. The allegations contained in the first and second

sentences of paragraph 2 are conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations contained in the third

sentence of paragraph 2 to the extent supported by the Standard

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 2 of 15

Contracts cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the third sentence of paragraph 2. 3. The allegations contained in paragraph 3 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 4. The allegations contained in paragraph 4 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 5. The allegations contained in paragraph 5 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 6. The allegations contained in paragraph 6 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 7. The allegations contained in paragraph 7 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

2

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 3 of 15

8.

The allegations contained in paragraph 8 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 9. Denies the allegations contained in the first through

third sentences of paragraph 9 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Admits the allegations contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 9 to the extent supported by the licenses cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the fourth sentence of paragraph 9. Denies the allegations contained in the fifth sentence of paragraph 9 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. Admits the allegations

contained in the sixth sentence of paragraph 9 to the extent supported by the documents cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the sixth sentence of paragraph 9. Denies the allegations contained

in the seventh sentence of paragraph 9, which is surrounded by parenthesis, for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth. 10. 11. Admits. The allegations contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 11 are conclusions of law and plaintiff's

3

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 4 of 15

characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations contained in the second

sentence of paragraph 11 to the extent supported by the licenses cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 11. 12. The allegations contained in the first and second

sentences of paragraph 12 are conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations contained in the third Denies the allegations contained in

sentence of paragraph 12.

the fourth sentence of paragraph 12 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth; avers that plaintiff does not define the terms "safe," "isolated," or "disposal facilities." 13. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 13 to the

extent that they indicate that DOE, alone and without negotiation with the nuclear industry, developed the Standard Contract published at 10 C.F.R. § 961.11; admits that the Department of Energy and nuclear utility representatives developed the Standard Contract; admits the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 13 to the extent supported by the standard contract cited, which

4

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 5 of 15

is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 13. 14. Admits the allegations contained in the first sentence

of paragraph 14 to the extent supported by the standard contracts cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 14. Denies the

allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 14. 15. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 15 to

the extent supported by the standard contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 15. 16. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 16 to the

extent supported by the standard contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 16. 17. The allegation contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 17 that certain fees were paid "[i]n accordance with the terms of the Standard Contract" is a conclusion of law to which no response is required; to the extent that it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied; denies the remaining allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 17. Denies the allegations contained in the second sentence of paragraph 17 for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to their truth.

5

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 6 of 15

18.

Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 18 to the

extent supported by the standard contract cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 18. 19. The allegations contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 19 are conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations contained in the second

sentence of paragraph 19 to the extent supported by the preliminary determination cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 19. The allegations contained in the third sentence of

paragraph 19 are plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 20. The allegations contained in paragraph 20 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 21. The allegations contained in paragraph 21 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

6

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 7 of 15

22.

The allegations contained in paragraph 22 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 23. The allegations contained in paragraph 23 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 24. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 24 to the

extent supported by the Federal Register notice cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 24; avers that the "earlier acknowledgments" referred to in paragraph 24 are not cited or otherwise identified. 25. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 25 to the

extent supported by the petition for review and the court decision cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 25. 26. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 26 to the

extent supported by the documents cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 26. 27. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 27 to the

extent supported by the petition and the court decision cited,

7

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 8 of 15

which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 27. 28. Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 28 to the

extent supported by the court decision cited, which is the best evidence of its contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 28. 29. The allegations contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 29 are conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. Admits the allegations contained in the second

sentence of paragraph 29 that DOE has not yet begun the disposal of SNF under the standard contract published at 10 C.F.R. § 961.11 and that DOE has stated that it anticipates that it will not be able to begin SNF disposal until 2010 (see 60 Fed. Reg. 21,793, 21,794 (May 3, 1995)); otherwise denies the allegations contained in paragraph 29. The allegations contained in the

third through fifth sentences of paragraph 29 are plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 30. The allegation contained in the first sentence of

paragraph 30 that there is "an ample surplus of funds available for contract performance" is plaintiff's characterization of this

8

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 9 of 15

action to which no response is required; to the extent that it may be deemed an allegation of fact, it is denied; admits the remaining allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 30 to the extent supported by the records of Waste Fund expenditures and Waste Fund receipts cited, which are the best evidence of their contents; otherwise denies the allegations contained in the first sentence of paragraph 30. Denies the

allegations contained in second sentence of paragraph 30; avers that the storage and transportation of foreign reactor fuel has no bearing for comparison purposes with the storage of commercial spent nuclear fuel. The allegations contained in the third

sentence of paragraph 30 are plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 31. The allegations contained in paragraph 31 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 32. The allegations contained in paragraph 32 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 33. The allegations contained in paragraph 33 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this

9

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 10 of 15

action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 34. The allegations contained in paragraph 34 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 35. The allegations contained in paragraph 35 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 36. The allegations contained in paragraph 36 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 37. Defendant's response to paragraphs 1 through 36 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 38. The allegations contained in paragraph 38 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 39. The allegations contained in paragraph 39 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

10

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 11 of 15

40.

The allegations contained in paragraph 40 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 41. 42. 43. Denies. Denies. Defendant's response to paragraphs 1 through 42 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 44. The allegations contained in paragraph 44 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 45. The allegations contained in paragraph 45 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 46. The allegations contained in paragraph 46 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 47. 48. 49. Denies. Denies. Defendant's response to paragraphs 1 through 48 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference.

11

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 12 of 15

50.

The allegations contained in paragraph 50 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 51. The allegations contained in paragraph 51 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 52. The allegations contained in paragraph 52 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 53. 54. Denies. Defendant's response to paragraphs 1 through 53 of the

complaint are incorporated by reference. 55. The allegations contained in paragraph 55 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 56. The allegations contained in paragraph 56 are

conclusions of law to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied.

12

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 13 of 15

57.

The allegations contained in paragraph 57 are

conclusions of law and plaintiff's characterization of this action to which no response is required; to the extent that they may be deemed allegations of fact, they are denied. 58. 59. Denies. Denies that plaintiff is entitled to the relief set

forth in the prayer for relief in paragraph 59, or to any relief whatsoever. 60. Denies each and every allegation not previously

admitted or otherwise qualified. WHEREFORE, defendant requests that the Court enter judgment in its favor, order that the complaint be dismissed, and grant defendant such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director s/ Harold D. Lester, Jr. HAROLD D. LESTER, JR. Assistant Director

13

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 14 of 15

s/ Marian E. Sullivan MARIAN E. SULLIVAN Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 307-0365 Fax: (202) 307-2503 May 7, 2004 Attorneys for Defendant

14

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 239

Filed 05/07/2004

Page 15 of 15

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on this 7th day of May 2004, a copy of foregoing "DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of

this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. through the Court's system. Parties may access this filing

s/Marian E. Sullivan