Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 1 of 40
ATTACHMENT A DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' DESIGNATIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS LAKE H. BARRETT Objections: Designation April 22, 2002 49:2 - 60:22 85:1 - 96:22 116:14 - 124:22 196:13 - 200:22 205:1 - 208:22 217:1 - 220:22 April 23, 2002 337:1 - 352:22 Foundation, vague, best evidence, hearsay, speculation, assumes facts not in evidence, relevance Speculation, foundation Speculation, legal conclusion Best evidence, hearsay, speculation Speculation Speculation, legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion, foundation Foundation, speculation Speculation Speculation, vague, overly broad, legal conclusion Speculation Speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Objection
401:1 - 404:22 409:1 - 412:22 449:1 - 456:22 473:1 - 476:22 489:1 - 492:22 521:1 - 523:2 April 26, 2002 555:1 - 574:22 579:1 - 594:22
Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Vague, overly broad, speculation, legal conclusion 1
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 2 of 40
619:1 - 622:22 707:1 - 710:22 715:1 - 718:22 739:1 - 742:22 771:1 - 782:22 787:1 - 798:22 May 8, 2002 910:1 - 925:22 942:1 - 953:22 962:1 - 965:22 1062:1 - 1065:22 1094:1 - 1099:13 May 10, 2002 1152:8 - 1159:15 1244:1 - 1247:22 1328:1 - 1343:22 1350:2-1355:15 1368:1 - 1375:22 1390:1-1393:22 1416:1 - 1427:22 May 14, 2002 118:1 - 125:25 238:9-239:22
Foundation, vague, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Speculation, legal conclusion, foundation Assumes facts not in evidence Speculation, foundation, legal conclusion, best evidence
Speculation, foundation, legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony, foundation Speculation, foundation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion, foundation, speculation Foundation
Speculation Speculation, legal conclusion Speculation, best evidence, foundation, legal conclusion Speculation, relevance Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion Relevance Speculation, foundation
Foundation, speculation, vague Relevance
2
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 3 of 40
Counter-designations: April 22, 2002 38:14-15 43:13-49:1 65:10-69:19 80:10-81:1 83:7-84:5 116:14-117:18 120:22-121:21 138:2-139:9 149:5-150:5 180:16-181:17 194:19-197:7 201:15-203:3 242:16-249:19 April 23, 2002 399:22-401:3 412:22-413:16 430:14-435:2 442:19-445:5 461:14-465:9 470:4-472:22 April 26, 2002 594:18-595:7 616:9-619:5 699:6-16 742:14-743:1 782:20-786:20 May 8, 2002 939:13-942:1 953:21-955:14 965:18-966:15 1045:1-1049:2
3
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 4 of 40
May 10, 2002 1148:22-1151:22 1341:2-1342:14 1347:14-1348:14
ALAN BROWNSTEIN Objections: Designation April 9, 2002 66:1-70:24 75:20-78:5 78:7-80:8 132:18-144:18 April 10, 2002 277:15-21 328:22-337:3 367:14-378:5 447:21-454:23 April 11, 2002 513:16-23 514:4-519:9 729:6-731:9 June 14, 2002 292:15-305:11 423:1-430:25 Relevance, foundation Legal conclusion, best evidence Legal conclusion, speculation Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Speculation Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion Vague Legal conclusion, speculation, vague Objection
4
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 5 of 40
Counter-designations: April 9, 2002 57:1-58:2 61:16-63:4 88:5-89:8 115:14-117:18 April 10, 2002 294:7-295:19 319:19-320:11 388:23-400:21 April 11, 2002 549:7-14 582:13-583:14 717:1-725:24 731:15-732:17 May 23, 2002 32:8-37:19 140:3-9 152:6-156:25 162:1-167:15 214:1-8
BILLY M. COLE Objections: Designation March 12, 2002 8:1-9:25 34:1-41:25 54:17-55:9 Relevance Relevance Vague Objection
5
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 6 of 40
57:3-57:25 78:1 78:17-80:19 81:14-22 104:13-105:12 106:20-107:10 113:21-25 126:1-10 133:8-25 165:19-25 170:1-171:8 177:8-22 180:25-181:25 198:1-190:7 201:4-18 202:25-203:25 205:23-25 242:1-244:6 March 13, 2002 252:1-253:25 306:1-9 309:18-25 342:1-343:4 346:11-347:20 349:23-25 362:1-20
Relevance Relevance Relevance Foundation Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Foundation Hearsay Relevance Relevance
Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance
6
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 7 of 40
Counter-designations: March 12, 2002 10:4-10 47:21-48:2 53:24-25 60:17-61:8 63:10-16 77:7-12 82:1-22 83:23-84:13 101:13-25 135:12-136:1 140:4-142:13 151:6-152:13 186:16-187:17 188:23-190:12 193:11-195:12 217:11-219:2 March 13, 2002 278:2-13 279:25-282:6 325:11-327:4 353:20-354:17 504:6-21
SUSAN KLEIN Objections: Designation April 24, 2002 79:4-17 80:12-82:22 83:17-84:22 Mischaracterizes prior testimony Relevance Relevance, beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, vague Objection
7
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 8 of 40
101:1-13 101:13-19 103:11-22 104:1-9 105:22-106:11 106:15-108:6 108:20-109:7 109:20-110:12 110:13-20 111:3-9 111:13-112:5 112:7-16 112:17-22 121:1-13 121:17-22 122:8-17 122:21-123:8 124:14-22 149:1-150:4 152:5-22 165:1-170:14
Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, speculation, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance
8
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 9 of 40
170:15-171:1 171:2-172:6 172:7-14 172:15-22 237:1-2 237:21-238:5 239:17-240:7 241:11-22 242:2-15 242:20-243:10 243:12-16 243:18-244:7 244:9-18 244:20-22 269:1-3 269:4:12 269:14-22 April 25, 2002 288:1-13 290:20-22 351:1-4 351:22-352:5
Relevance, beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Relevance Relevance, beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Best evidence Vague Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, relevance
Relevance Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice
9
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 10 of 40
Counter-designations: April 24, 2002 10:20-11:9 54:1-55:13 56:8-58:7:3-4 61:3-18 62:21-63:5 132:7-15 April 25, 2002 354:17-355:13 376:13-382:22 400:7-401:17 482:11-483:10 528:8-530:19
CHRISTOPHER A. KOUTS Objections: Designation June 4, 1999 93:16-23 January 30, 2004 177:1-179:22 190:1-192:22 April 11, 2005 17:21-18:14 22:17-23:14 32:3-21 46:20-47:2 Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation Vague Speculation, relevance Speculation, relevance Legal conclusion Objection
10
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 11 of 40
74:15-75:8 95:1-7 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony June 4, 1999 53:24-55:1 86:23-89:2 107:13-112:4 144:20-146:11 January 30, 2004 21:14-22:3 45:5-10 212:20-218:12 February 19, 2004 298:15-299:15 381:5-395:3 435:3-437:8 March 12, 2004 70:9-74:1 April 11, 2005 16:19-17:3 72:21-73:19 118:20-120:9 Trial Testimony August 2, 2004 3455:25-3459:2
Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion, relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance
11
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 12 of 40
MICHAEL J. LAWRENCE Objections: Designation May 20, 2002 22:1-7 42:1-43:22 43:23-44:8 44:9-14 44:15-20 44:21-45:10 45:11-21 45:22-48:25 50:5-11 50:12-16 50:17-51:3 52:18-25 53:4-9 53:10-21 54:1-13 54:14-55:2 55:8-19 55:20-56:7 60:23-61:8 61:9-14 62:4-15 63:4-12 Relevance Relevance Relevance, Foundation Relevance, Foundation Relevance, Foundation Relevance Relevance, Foundation Relevance Relevance, speculation Relevance, speculation Relevance Vague Relevance, foundation Foundation, relevance Foundation Foundation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony Foundation Objection
12
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 13 of 40
64:7-21 64:22-65:2 65:3-8 65:14-22 68:4-13 69:6-16 69:17-70:5 73:1-4 73:8-25 74:17-75:1 75:8-21 76:3-18 77:2-18 78:5-15 78:16-23 78:24-79:15 79:16-80:5 80:6-21 80:22-81:1 81:2-18 82:5-83:3 83:4-10 84:1-13 84:14-85:2 85:10-21 86:7-23 86:24-87:9
Foundation Foundation Foundation Speculation Foundation, speculation Compound Assumes facts not in evidence Foundation Foundation Legal conclusion Vague Speculation Vague, compound, speculation, foundation Legal conclusion, compound Legal conclusion, vague Vague Foundation Foundation Foundation Foundation Relevance, foundation Relevance, foundation Foundation, vague Legal conclusion Foundation, best evidence Legal conclusion, foundation Mischaracterizes prior testimony 13
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 14 of 40
87:10-19 87:20-88:8 90:4-13 90:14-24 91:5-8 91:9-23 91:24-92:16 92:17-93:5 93:6-94:15 94:16-96:4 96:5-9 98:4-13 98:14-23 98:24-99:11 99:12-20 101:24-25 130:1-6 131:1-7 131:18-133:25 142:1-143:14 144:9-16 144:17-145:3 145:4-11 145:17-24 145:25-146:4 146:5-14
Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Relevance Vague, relevance Relevance Relevance, compound Relevance, compound Relevance Speculation, relevance Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion, mischaracterizes prior testimony Vague, legal conclusion Relevance, vague Relevance Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Foundation Foundation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, vague, speculation Relevance, foundation, speculation, vague
14
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 15 of 40
146:15-18 146:19-25 147:1-15 148:19-149:2 149:10-150:6 150:11-25 152:17-153:7 153:8-153:19 153:20-25 186:1-9 186:10-22 188:14-189:3 189:4-9 189:24-25 198:1-3 198:4-15 198:16-199:7 199:8-15 203:4-204:4 205:8-206:7 206:8-17 209:6-12 211:3-8 211:9-212:4 212:13-19 214:1-7 214:8-19
Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation, speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance Relevance Vague, relevance Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation, vague Foundation, speculation Relevance Relevance Vague, speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony Vague Speculation, compound Foundation, speculation Speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Speculation Best evidence Foundation, vague 15
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 16 of 40
217:17-218:5 219:8-16 220:14-221:15 221:16-23 222:5-224:5 May 21, 2002 244:1-25 245:1-14 245:15-246:2 246:3-15 246:16-247:21 247:22-248:4 247:5-8 249:12-19 250:2-13 250:14-251:25 300:1-301:7 301:8-13 302:24-303:8 304:2-11 304:12-18 305:5-24 305:25-306:11 306:12-19 306:20-307:6
Legal conclusion Speculation, compound Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Relevance
Relevance Relevance, foundation Foundation, legal conclusion, relevance Relevance Compound Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation Foundation, speculation Relevance Relevance Relevance, speculation Legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion, mischaracterizes document Speculation, legal conclusion, mischaracterizes document Relevance Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation
16
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 17 of 40
320:1-7 320:8-13 320:14-19 321:15-24 321:25-322:2 322:3-24 324:7-13 327:5-23 328:18-329:10 329:11-22 330:2-8 332:3-19 332:20-333:4 333:12-334:5 334:6-16 334:17-25 335:1-8 335:22-336:11 336:12-337:12 337:13-23 338:8-22 338:23-339:9 339:10-25 356:1-25
Relevance Best evidence, relevance Relevance Speculation, legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation, speculation Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion Speculation, best evidence Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion, best evidence Legal conclusion, vague, relevance Legal conclusion, relevance Legal conclusion Relevance, legal conclusion, best evidence Relevance, legal conclusion, best evidence Relevance Foundation, speculation Best evidence, mischaracterizes document Relevance Relevance
17
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 18 of 40
Counter-designations: May 20, 2002 111:10-113:20 122:8-123:25 124:8-126:23 165:13-167:6 169:11-174:24 184:3-185:24 May 21, 2002 255:3-258:10 259:14-260:22 266:22-267:25 294:6-295:5 308:1-309:20 311:10-315:18 316:20-317:25 341:19-342:18 344:13-345:19
PATRICK McDUFFIE Objections Designations March 18, 2002 34:1-24 35:25-36:13 40:4-41:25 70:1-6 71:25-72:6 73:21-25 110:1-7 112:11-17 18 Relevance Compound Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance, foundation Legal conclusion Objection
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 19 of 40
112:19-113:4 117:6-25 162:1-164:20 165:18-25 182:1-23 Counter-designations: March 18, 2002 79:6-8 80:10-17 128:5-13 March 19, 2002 193:21-194:25 195:10-196:5 321:17-23
Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance
RONALD A. MILNER Objections: Designation May 1, 2002 36:1-16 37:19-38:4 38:5-8 38:10-15 38:17-20 38:22-25 42:1-7 Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Vague Relevance Relevance Objection
19
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 20 of 40
42:8-13 42:18-24 43:1-5 43:8-12 43:14-20 44:23-45:25 72:2-7 72:9-19 73:10-22 76:8-14 76:16-20 76:22-77:4 78:6-14 79:7-16 84:11-15 85:25 87:1-3 87:4-88:4 88:8-14 88:15-21 90:1-5 91:8-16 98:1-2 99:20-100:3
Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), best evidence Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Vague Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Speculation Speculation Relevance Foundation Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness)
20
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 21 of 40
100:24-25 107:1 114:1-2 114:22-115:5 115:6-22 133:14-23 133:24-25 139:1-4 139:5-9 160:21-161:2 161:4-12 161:14-20 164:21-165:6 166:3-10 167:19-168:1 168:3-17 194:1-195:3 195:4-10 195:11-17 May 2, 2002 205:1-207:10 208:5-15 209:18-25 214:1-8 216:10-19
Relevance Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation Foundation, speculation Relevance Relevance Relevance, vague Best evidence Speculation Legal conclusion Foundation Vague, compound Vague, compound Vague, compound Relevance Relevance, vague Relevance
Relevance Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness)
21
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 22 of 40
216:21-217:6 217:8-16 217:18-22 217:23-25 246:1 253:24-25 270:1-11 271:8-13 271:14-272:22 274:3-14 276:8-13 276:15-17 276:19-15 277:23-25 280:1-6 280:8-281:5 281:6-11 321:1-322:11 322:12-18 322:20-323:5 323:19-25 326:1-3 326:14-21 327:22-25 330:11-15
Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance, speculation Vague Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Relevance Legal conclusion Foundation Foundation Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance, vague Foundation Relevance Vague 22
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 23 of 40
333:11-17 334:11-19 337:20-25 346:1-346:2 346:3-12 346:13-347:5 347:6-14 347:16-25 366:1-368:25 374:1-3 374:11-13 390:1-2 392:22-393:3 May 3, 2002 410:1-411:5 413:3-8 413:12-21 415:1-25 425:1-5 425:6-11 425:25 524:1-19 525:25-526:9 527:19-24 550:1 550:2-8 550:10-16 23
Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance, vague Relevance Relevance, foundation Relevance Relevance, speculation Relevance, speculation, foundation Relevance Relevance, Relevance Relevance, Speculation
Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Speculation Best evidence Relevance Relevance, speculation Foundation
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 24 of 40
550:21-551:4 551:7-13 553:7-12 554:5-555:6 559:4-11 559:13-21 560:17-23 562:15-22 564:20-565:2 565:12-18 565:20-25 568:1-2 568:4-12 568:25-569:6 570:21-571:4 571:17-24 572:10-19 574:5-10 574:21-575:4 575:6-19 575:21-576:7 577:12-578:2 578:4-9 May 7, 2002 586:1-587:25
Assumes facts not in evidence, speculation Mischaracterizes document, speculation Mischaracterizes document Best evidence Mischaracterizes document Vague Speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony, assumes facts not in evidence Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Vague Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), mischaracterizes document Speculation Speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, best evidence Legal conclusion, speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness)
Relevance
24
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 25 of 40
596:1-13 597:8-17 597:19-5 598:16-21 598:23-25 600:1 600:7-13 600:15-601:4 601:6-14 601:16-20 618:1-4 621:21-622:4 622:6-9 622:11-19 623:11-25 630:1-3 632:8-14 667:1-2 668:5-25 681:1-2 683:1-6 704:1-705:2 705:3-8 705:10-13 706:6-18 25
Mischaracterizes document, speculation Assumes facts not in evidence, speculation Unfair characterization Speculation Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Speculation Speculation Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), speculation, best evidence Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), speculation, best evidence Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), speculation, best evidence Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion, relevance Relevance Vague, speculation
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 26 of 40
707:2-7 708:18-709:2 709:8-13 710:15-20 711:12-18 714:11-18 715:22-25 728:1-7 728:8-729:4 729:5-730:25 May 8, 2002 220:1-13 August 11, 2004 4745:1-10 4749:1-15 4764:22-25 4772:1 4772:21-25
Speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), best evidence Vague Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Unfair characterization, relevance Relevance
Relevance
Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance
26
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 27 of 40
Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony May 1, 2002 27:23-28:6 41:3-24 68:1-71:25 75:16-25 80:1 89:1-15 157:18-159:25 170:1-174:5 May 2, 2002 282:1-12 289:2-291:18 300:10-305:22 307:25-310:17 317:24-318:21 May 7, 2002 592:14-19 609:2-22 625:16-626:11 May 7, 2002 25:2-21 31:4-18 May 8, 2002 70:18-71:20 146:14-147:8 155:4-16 172:12-23 211:24-216:2 221:1-2 228:19-229:20
27
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 28 of 40
256:11-257:10 260:3-261:24 Trial Testimony August 11, 2004 4722:23-25 4724:5-25 4727:1-4732:25 4735:9-25 4738:1-3 4740:16-25 4746:1-3 4746:23-4747:15 4753:11-4754:9 4755:23-4756:12 4760:16-4760:25 4763:1-4 4763:21-25 4765:13-4766:13 4780:19-4782:12 4784:2-11 4788:20-4789:24
ROBERT L. MORGAN Objections: Designation March 21, 2002 42:2 - 43:23 46:18-24 48:2 - 49:2 74:9-23 108:3 - 109:15 138:22 - 141:4 Foundation, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Foundation, legal conclusion Vague, relevance Foundation Objection
28
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 29 of 40
204:20-24 208:8 - 209:12 March 22, 2002 223:6 - 224:1 225:19 - 227:16 313:18 - 315:1 June 25, 2002 135:6-14 August 3, 2004 3670:19 - 3675:23 Counter-designations: March 21, 2002 52:9-54:25 61:1-63:4 99:22-103:25 116:2-117:21 130:20-132:14 149:21-152:1 154:20-156:15 March 22, 2002 299:2-299:21 June 25, 2002 131:17-132:16 144:9-145:11
Legal conclusion Relevance
Speculation Foundation, speculation Vague, foundation
Foundation
Relevance
29
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 30 of 40
THOMAS POLLOG Objections: Designation April 11, 2002 181:7-22 April 12, 2002 105:1-25 109:1-25 136:17-24 137:4-25 144:1-25 174:1-177:19 May 16, 2002 277:9-278:14 281:1-25 294:1-295:25 299:3-25 306:1-25 309:1-25 319:1-320:25 322:1-25 324:5-10 330:14 Legal conclusion, foundation, vague, speculation Vague, relevance Speculation, best evidence, foundation Foundation, vague Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation, best evidence Best evidence Mischaracterizes prior testimony Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion, vague, mischaracterizes prior testimony 30 Legal conclusion, foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) deposition notice) Legal conclusion, foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) deposition notice) Legal conclusion Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 20(b)(6) deposition notice), speculation, vague, legal conclusion Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 20(b)(6) deposition notice) Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 20(b)(6) deposition notice), relevance Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 30(b)(6)) Objection
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 31 of 40
345:1-25 347:1-25 377:7-25 385:4-387:24 393:1-25 410:1-413:25 415:1-416:25 431:1-432:25 437:1-439:25 492:1-25 557:1-559:25 563:1-564:25 576:1-577:25 604:1-605:25 659:1-25 667:1-669:25 August 4, 2004 3956:21-3957:6 3963:1-3964:24 3968:4-14 3971:15-22 4037:13-4039:21
Relevance Assumes facts not in evidence Relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance Vague, compound Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation, foundation Relevance Legal conclusion, best evidence, foundation, relevance Legal conclusion, foundation, vague, relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance Legal conclusion, foundation, relevance Foundation, relevance Vague, best evidence, speculation, relevance
Hearsay Hearsay Hearsay Hearsay Vague
31
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 32 of 40
Counter-designations: April 11, 2002 31:1-34:5 41:5:-44:15 60:1-63:18 64:22-67:13 74:10-19 92:12-93:9 107:1-108:2 123:15-124:10 144:3-145:15 151:14-154:16 155:18-156:13 158:16-172:12 174:1-22 183:4-184:2 185:2-186:22 191:8-192:23 206:16-208:6 210:24-211:22 212:3-213:19 April 12, 2002 9:25-16:17 21:17-24:21 37:15-41:8 43:24-45:3 49:14-25 91:4-92:10 100:22-110:1 115:11-116:20 117:11-118:18 160:12-162:19 163:5-19 May 16, 2002 320:15-321:7 322:20-323:17 381:1-25 409:1-25 32
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 33 of 40
414:1-25 417:1-418:13 May 22, 2002 575:5-25 599:9-600-11 ROBERT M. ROSSELLI Objections: Designation April 15, 2002 93:11-94:13 95:15-96:25 141:12-18 143:15-144:2 147:8-148:9 149:2-17 Foundation, speculation Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Objection
Counter-designations: April 15, 2002 48:6-17 68:9-71:16 93:20-94:10 134:23-138:14 158:5-162:18 April 16, 2002 193:25-196:14 263:23-264:6 296:8-300:22
33
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 34 of 40
BEN RUSCHE Objections: Designation May 16, 2002 42:1 - 49:25 154:2 - 161:25 170:1 - 173:25 242:1 - 249:25 298:1 - 300:19 May 17, 2002 329:1 - 332:25 337:1 - 344:22 365:1 - 380:22 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony May 16, 2002 161:16-162:21 174:5-185:4 187:25-189:15 219:15-220:21 230:17-233:23 271:1-274:8 289:16-293:3 295:12-296:21 297:3-298:7 May 17, 2002 436:18-438:14 Speculation Foundation, hearsay, speculation, relevance Foundation, hearsay, speculation, relevance Speculation, legal conclusion, relevance Legal conclusion, relevance Speculation, relevance Foundation, relevance Relevance Objection
34
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 35 of 40
Trial Testimony August 3, 2004 3697:4-9 3713:14-23 3721:21-3723:4 3728:24-3729:19
NANCY SLATER-THOMPSON (MONTGOMERY) Objections: Designation June 13, 2002 94:4-15 96:17 - 99:6 101:11-19 106:1-110:24 111:13-21 112:4-15 112:16-113:16 162:1-11 Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague Foundation, vague Legal conclusion Foundation Legal conclusion Vague Vague Objection
Counter-designations: April 21, 1999 32:23-33:6 82:10-15 82:19-83:10 106:16-108:10 164:23-165:13 176:11-25
35
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 36 of 40
April 22, 1999 245:17-246:4 251:23-253:10 253:22-254:11 257:23-259:24 June 13, 2002 87:24-89:4 VICTOR TREBULES Objections: Designation April 17, 2002 19:5-35:7 42:1-21 52:1-61:1 131:16-132:22 160:1-161:22 April 18, 2002 328:3-12 April 18, 2002 (Yankee Atomic deposition) 18:22-24:10 Counter-designations: April 17, 2002 16:2-17 42:5-43:17 76:17-77:22 78:1-81:20 84:12-88:6 36 Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, foundation, vague, speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Objections
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 37 of 40
96:19-103:22 113:18-116:14 146:12-148:21 173:2-176:9 180:7-186:22 207:1-15 April 18, 2002 302:21-305:14 380:3-382:14 April 18, 2002 (Yankee Atomic deposition) 125:20-127:13 DAVID K. ZABRANSKY Objections: Designation April 17, 2002 30:6-42:22 46:3-54:18 59:2-60:17 64:10-65:8 77:4-80:16 85:9-95:12 99:22-101:10 110:10-111:6 130:1-131:18 158:5-160:9 183:6-184:22 292:1-293:5 37 Legal conclusion, vague, best evidence, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, vague, speculation Legal conclusion, foundation, vague Legal conclusion, speculation, vague Legal conclusion, foundation Legal conclusion Speculation, vague Legal conclusion Vague, legal conclusion Objection
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 38 of 40
295:6-299:22 300:1-306:22 318:18-330:22 334:6-368:22
Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague Foundation, legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, best evidence, vague, foundation, assumes facts not in evidence, speculation, relevance Relevance, vague Legal conclusion, vague, assumes facts not in evidence Legal conclusion, vague
371:1-381:22 417:12-439:21 455:1-8 April 19, 2002 636:1-639:11 668:1-671:22 681:1-685:21 717:1-718:18 June 6, 2002 241:7-248:8 385:11-386:2 April 12, 2005 13:6-14:20 20:7-13 26:1-14 30:1-37:17 59:1-16 61:7-63:3 70:1-71:22 75:1-76:22
Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, foundation Legal conclusion, foundation, vague Relevance
Legal conclusion, foundation Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion
Relevance Vague Legal conclusion, foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation, relevance, vague Legal conclusion, foundation Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance
38
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 39 of 40
Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony April 17, 2002 55:1-56:22 60:20-61:5 128:10-129:18 131:19-132:4 150:4-155:21 161:1-162:8 157:2-158:4 183:19-185:5 197:4-199:10 April 18, 2002 242:10-246:19 249:6-253:12 254:9-19 266:21-267:20 293:20-295:5 330:16-331:20 395:18-396:21 412:20-414:16 449:7-451:18 April 19, 2002 628:15-631:22 639:12-640:8 648:15-651:20 June 6, 2002 229:7-231:20 234:6-240:19 April 12, 2005 16:9-17:17 25:1-22
39
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM
Document 325-2
Filed 03/16/2006
Page 40 of 40
Trial Testimony August 5, 2004 4124:24-4126:8 4128:18-4130:4 4155:19-4157:6 4158:1-4159:1 4159:21-4160:16 4161:19-4162:9 4189:25-4192:4 4222:15-4226:3
40