Free Response - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 88.7 kB
Pages: 40
Date: March 16, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 4,419 Words, 28,729 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13163/325-2.pdf

Download Response - District Court of Federal Claims ( 88.7 kB)


Preview Response - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 1 of 40

ATTACHMENT A DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' DESIGNATIONS AND COUNTER-DESIGNATIONS LAKE H. BARRETT Objections: Designation April 22, 2002 49:2 - 60:22 85:1 - 96:22 116:14 - 124:22 196:13 - 200:22 205:1 - 208:22 217:1 - 220:22 April 23, 2002 337:1 - 352:22 Foundation, vague, best evidence, hearsay, speculation, assumes facts not in evidence, relevance Speculation, foundation Speculation, legal conclusion Best evidence, hearsay, speculation Speculation Speculation, legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion, foundation Foundation, speculation Speculation Speculation, vague, overly broad, legal conclusion Speculation Speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Objection

401:1 - 404:22 409:1 - 412:22 449:1 - 456:22 473:1 - 476:22 489:1 - 492:22 521:1 - 523:2 April 26, 2002 555:1 - 574:22 579:1 - 594:22

Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Vague, overly broad, speculation, legal conclusion 1

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 2 of 40

619:1 - 622:22 707:1 - 710:22 715:1 - 718:22 739:1 - 742:22 771:1 - 782:22 787:1 - 798:22 May 8, 2002 910:1 - 925:22 942:1 - 953:22 962:1 - 965:22 1062:1 - 1065:22 1094:1 - 1099:13 May 10, 2002 1152:8 - 1159:15 1244:1 - 1247:22 1328:1 - 1343:22 1350:2-1355:15 1368:1 - 1375:22 1390:1-1393:22 1416:1 - 1427:22 May 14, 2002 118:1 - 125:25 238:9-239:22

Foundation, vague, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Speculation, legal conclusion, foundation Assumes facts not in evidence Speculation, foundation, legal conclusion, best evidence

Speculation, foundation, legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony, foundation Speculation, foundation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion, foundation, speculation Foundation

Speculation Speculation, legal conclusion Speculation, best evidence, foundation, legal conclusion Speculation, relevance Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion Relevance Speculation, foundation

Foundation, speculation, vague Relevance

2

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 3 of 40

Counter-designations: April 22, 2002 38:14-15 43:13-49:1 65:10-69:19 80:10-81:1 83:7-84:5 116:14-117:18 120:22-121:21 138:2-139:9 149:5-150:5 180:16-181:17 194:19-197:7 201:15-203:3 242:16-249:19 April 23, 2002 399:22-401:3 412:22-413:16 430:14-435:2 442:19-445:5 461:14-465:9 470:4-472:22 April 26, 2002 594:18-595:7 616:9-619:5 699:6-16 742:14-743:1 782:20-786:20 May 8, 2002 939:13-942:1 953:21-955:14 965:18-966:15 1045:1-1049:2

3

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 4 of 40

May 10, 2002 1148:22-1151:22 1341:2-1342:14 1347:14-1348:14

ALAN BROWNSTEIN Objections: Designation April 9, 2002 66:1-70:24 75:20-78:5 78:7-80:8 132:18-144:18 April 10, 2002 277:15-21 328:22-337:3 367:14-378:5 447:21-454:23 April 11, 2002 513:16-23 514:4-519:9 729:6-731:9 June 14, 2002 292:15-305:11 423:1-430:25 Relevance, foundation Legal conclusion, best evidence Legal conclusion, speculation Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Speculation Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion Vague Legal conclusion, speculation, vague Objection

4

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 5 of 40

Counter-designations: April 9, 2002 57:1-58:2 61:16-63:4 88:5-89:8 115:14-117:18 April 10, 2002 294:7-295:19 319:19-320:11 388:23-400:21 April 11, 2002 549:7-14 582:13-583:14 717:1-725:24 731:15-732:17 May 23, 2002 32:8-37:19 140:3-9 152:6-156:25 162:1-167:15 214:1-8

BILLY M. COLE Objections: Designation March 12, 2002 8:1-9:25 34:1-41:25 54:17-55:9 Relevance Relevance Vague Objection

5

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 6 of 40

57:3-57:25 78:1 78:17-80:19 81:14-22 104:13-105:12 106:20-107:10 113:21-25 126:1-10 133:8-25 165:19-25 170:1-171:8 177:8-22 180:25-181:25 198:1-190:7 201:4-18 202:25-203:25 205:23-25 242:1-244:6 March 13, 2002 252:1-253:25 306:1-9 309:18-25 342:1-343:4 346:11-347:20 349:23-25 362:1-20

Relevance Relevance Relevance Foundation Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Foundation Hearsay Relevance Relevance

Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance

6

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 7 of 40

Counter-designations: March 12, 2002 10:4-10 47:21-48:2 53:24-25 60:17-61:8 63:10-16 77:7-12 82:1-22 83:23-84:13 101:13-25 135:12-136:1 140:4-142:13 151:6-152:13 186:16-187:17 188:23-190:12 193:11-195:12 217:11-219:2 March 13, 2002 278:2-13 279:25-282:6 325:11-327:4 353:20-354:17 504:6-21

SUSAN KLEIN Objections: Designation April 24, 2002 79:4-17 80:12-82:22 83:17-84:22 Mischaracterizes prior testimony Relevance Relevance, beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, vague Objection

7

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 8 of 40

101:1-13 101:13-19 103:11-22 104:1-9 105:22-106:11 106:15-108:6 108:20-109:7 109:20-110:12 110:13-20 111:3-9 111:13-112:5 112:7-16 112:17-22 121:1-13 121:17-22 122:8-17 122:21-123:8 124:14-22 149:1-150:4 152:5-22 165:1-170:14

Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, speculation, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance

8

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 9 of 40

170:15-171:1 171:2-172:6 172:7-14 172:15-22 237:1-2 237:21-238:5 239:17-240:7 241:11-22 242:2-15 242:20-243:10 243:12-16 243:18-244:7 244:9-18 244:20-22 269:1-3 269:4:12 269:14-22 April 25, 2002 288:1-13 290:20-22 351:1-4 351:22-352:5

Relevance, beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Relevance Relevance, beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Best evidence Vague Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, relevance

Relevance Relevance Relevance Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice

9

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 10 of 40

Counter-designations: April 24, 2002 10:20-11:9 54:1-55:13 56:8-58:7:3-4 61:3-18 62:21-63:5 132:7-15 April 25, 2002 354:17-355:13 376:13-382:22 400:7-401:17 482:11-483:10 528:8-530:19

CHRISTOPHER A. KOUTS Objections: Designation June 4, 1999 93:16-23 January 30, 2004 177:1-179:22 190:1-192:22 April 11, 2005 17:21-18:14 22:17-23:14 32:3-21 46:20-47:2 Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation Vague Speculation, relevance Speculation, relevance Legal conclusion Objection

10

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 11 of 40

74:15-75:8 95:1-7 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony June 4, 1999 53:24-55:1 86:23-89:2 107:13-112:4 144:20-146:11 January 30, 2004 21:14-22:3 45:5-10 212:20-218:12 February 19, 2004 298:15-299:15 381:5-395:3 435:3-437:8 March 12, 2004 70:9-74:1 April 11, 2005 16:19-17:3 72:21-73:19 118:20-120:9 Trial Testimony August 2, 2004 3455:25-3459:2

Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion, relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance

11

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 12 of 40

MICHAEL J. LAWRENCE Objections: Designation May 20, 2002 22:1-7 42:1-43:22 43:23-44:8 44:9-14 44:15-20 44:21-45:10 45:11-21 45:22-48:25 50:5-11 50:12-16 50:17-51:3 52:18-25 53:4-9 53:10-21 54:1-13 54:14-55:2 55:8-19 55:20-56:7 60:23-61:8 61:9-14 62:4-15 63:4-12 Relevance Relevance Relevance, Foundation Relevance, Foundation Relevance, Foundation Relevance Relevance, Foundation Relevance Relevance, speculation Relevance, speculation Relevance Vague Relevance, foundation Foundation, relevance Foundation Foundation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony Foundation Objection

12

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 13 of 40

64:7-21 64:22-65:2 65:3-8 65:14-22 68:4-13 69:6-16 69:17-70:5 73:1-4 73:8-25 74:17-75:1 75:8-21 76:3-18 77:2-18 78:5-15 78:16-23 78:24-79:15 79:16-80:5 80:6-21 80:22-81:1 81:2-18 82:5-83:3 83:4-10 84:1-13 84:14-85:2 85:10-21 86:7-23 86:24-87:9

Foundation Foundation Foundation Speculation Foundation, speculation Compound Assumes facts not in evidence Foundation Foundation Legal conclusion Vague Speculation Vague, compound, speculation, foundation Legal conclusion, compound Legal conclusion, vague Vague Foundation Foundation Foundation Foundation Relevance, foundation Relevance, foundation Foundation, vague Legal conclusion Foundation, best evidence Legal conclusion, foundation Mischaracterizes prior testimony 13

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 14 of 40

87:10-19 87:20-88:8 90:4-13 90:14-24 91:5-8 91:9-23 91:24-92:16 92:17-93:5 93:6-94:15 94:16-96:4 96:5-9 98:4-13 98:14-23 98:24-99:11 99:12-20 101:24-25 130:1-6 131:1-7 131:18-133:25 142:1-143:14 144:9-16 144:17-145:3 145:4-11 145:17-24 145:25-146:4 146:5-14

Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Relevance Vague, relevance Relevance Relevance, compound Relevance, compound Relevance Speculation, relevance Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, legal conclusion, mischaracterizes prior testimony Vague, legal conclusion Relevance, vague Relevance Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Foundation Foundation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, vague, speculation Relevance, foundation, speculation, vague

14

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 15 of 40

146:15-18 146:19-25 147:1-15 148:19-149:2 149:10-150:6 150:11-25 152:17-153:7 153:8-153:19 153:20-25 186:1-9 186:10-22 188:14-189:3 189:4-9 189:24-25 198:1-3 198:4-15 198:16-199:7 199:8-15 203:4-204:4 205:8-206:7 206:8-17 209:6-12 211:3-8 211:9-212:4 212:13-19 214:1-7 214:8-19

Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation, speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance Relevance Vague, relevance Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation, vague Foundation, speculation Relevance Relevance Vague, speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Mischaracterizes prior testimony Vague Speculation, compound Foundation, speculation Speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony Speculation Best evidence Foundation, vague 15

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 16 of 40

217:17-218:5 219:8-16 220:14-221:15 221:16-23 222:5-224:5 May 21, 2002 244:1-25 245:1-14 245:15-246:2 246:3-15 246:16-247:21 247:22-248:4 247:5-8 249:12-19 250:2-13 250:14-251:25 300:1-301:7 301:8-13 302:24-303:8 304:2-11 304:12-18 305:5-24 305:25-306:11 306:12-19 306:20-307:6

Legal conclusion Speculation, compound Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Relevance

Relevance Relevance, foundation Foundation, legal conclusion, relevance Relevance Compound Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation Foundation, speculation Relevance Relevance Relevance, speculation Legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion, mischaracterizes document Speculation, legal conclusion, mischaracterizes document Relevance Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation

16

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 17 of 40

320:1-7 320:8-13 320:14-19 321:15-24 321:25-322:2 322:3-24 324:7-13 327:5-23 328:18-329:10 329:11-22 330:2-8 332:3-19 332:20-333:4 333:12-334:5 334:6-16 334:17-25 335:1-8 335:22-336:11 336:12-337:12 337:13-23 338:8-22 338:23-339:9 339:10-25 356:1-25

Relevance Best evidence, relevance Relevance Speculation, legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation, speculation Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion Speculation, best evidence Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion, best evidence Legal conclusion, vague, relevance Legal conclusion, relevance Legal conclusion Relevance, legal conclusion, best evidence Relevance, legal conclusion, best evidence Relevance Foundation, speculation Best evidence, mischaracterizes document Relevance Relevance

17

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 18 of 40

Counter-designations: May 20, 2002 111:10-113:20 122:8-123:25 124:8-126:23 165:13-167:6 169:11-174:24 184:3-185:24 May 21, 2002 255:3-258:10 259:14-260:22 266:22-267:25 294:6-295:5 308:1-309:20 311:10-315:18 316:20-317:25 341:19-342:18 344:13-345:19

PATRICK McDUFFIE Objections Designations March 18, 2002 34:1-24 35:25-36:13 40:4-41:25 70:1-6 71:25-72:6 73:21-25 110:1-7 112:11-17 18 Relevance Compound Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance, foundation Legal conclusion Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 19 of 40

112:19-113:4 117:6-25 162:1-164:20 165:18-25 182:1-23 Counter-designations: March 18, 2002 79:6-8 80:10-17 128:5-13 March 19, 2002 193:21-194:25 195:10-196:5 321:17-23

Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance

RONALD A. MILNER Objections: Designation May 1, 2002 36:1-16 37:19-38:4 38:5-8 38:10-15 38:17-20 38:22-25 42:1-7 Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Vague Relevance Relevance Objection

19

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 20 of 40

42:8-13 42:18-24 43:1-5 43:8-12 43:14-20 44:23-45:25 72:2-7 72:9-19 73:10-22 76:8-14 76:16-20 76:22-77:4 78:6-14 79:7-16 84:11-15 85:25 87:1-3 87:4-88:4 88:8-14 88:15-21 90:1-5 91:8-16 98:1-2 99:20-100:3

Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), best evidence Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Vague Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Speculation Speculation Relevance Foundation Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness)

20

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 21 of 40

100:24-25 107:1 114:1-2 114:22-115:5 115:6-22 133:14-23 133:24-25 139:1-4 139:5-9 160:21-161:2 161:4-12 161:14-20 164:21-165:6 166:3-10 167:19-168:1 168:3-17 194:1-195:3 195:4-10 195:11-17 May 2, 2002 205:1-207:10 208:5-15 209:18-25 214:1-8 216:10-19

Relevance Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation Foundation, speculation Relevance Relevance Relevance, vague Best evidence Speculation Legal conclusion Foundation Vague, compound Vague, compound Vague, compound Relevance Relevance, vague Relevance

Relevance Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness)

21

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 22 of 40

216:21-217:6 217:8-16 217:18-22 217:23-25 246:1 253:24-25 270:1-11 271:8-13 271:14-272:22 274:3-14 276:8-13 276:15-17 276:19-15 277:23-25 280:1-6 280:8-281:5 281:6-11 321:1-322:11 322:12-18 322:20-323:5 323:19-25 326:1-3 326:14-21 327:22-25 330:11-15

Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance, speculation Vague Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Relevance Legal conclusion Foundation Foundation Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance, vague Foundation Relevance Vague 22

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 23 of 40

333:11-17 334:11-19 337:20-25 346:1-346:2 346:3-12 346:13-347:5 347:6-14 347:16-25 366:1-368:25 374:1-3 374:11-13 390:1-2 392:22-393:3 May 3, 2002 410:1-411:5 413:3-8 413:12-21 415:1-25 425:1-5 425:6-11 425:25 524:1-19 525:25-526:9 527:19-24 550:1 550:2-8 550:10-16 23

Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance, vague Relevance Relevance, foundation Relevance Relevance, speculation Relevance, speculation, foundation Relevance Relevance, Relevance Relevance, Speculation

Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Speculation Best evidence Relevance Relevance, speculation Foundation

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 24 of 40

550:21-551:4 551:7-13 553:7-12 554:5-555:6 559:4-11 559:13-21 560:17-23 562:15-22 564:20-565:2 565:12-18 565:20-25 568:1-2 568:4-12 568:25-569:6 570:21-571:4 571:17-24 572:10-19 574:5-10 574:21-575:4 575:6-19 575:21-576:7 577:12-578:2 578:4-9 May 7, 2002 586:1-587:25

Assumes facts not in evidence, speculation Mischaracterizes document, speculation Mischaracterizes document Best evidence Mischaracterizes document Vague Speculation Mischaracterizes prior testimony, assumes facts not in evidence Speculation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion Speculation Relevance, legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Vague Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), mischaracterizes document Speculation Speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, best evidence Legal conclusion, speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness)

Relevance

24

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 25 of 40

596:1-13 597:8-17 597:19-5 598:16-21 598:23-25 600:1 600:7-13 600:15-601:4 601:6-14 601:16-20 618:1-4 621:21-622:4 622:6-9 622:11-19 623:11-25 630:1-3 632:8-14 667:1-2 668:5-25 681:1-2 683:1-6 704:1-705:2 705:3-8 705:10-13 706:6-18 25

Mischaracterizes document, speculation Assumes facts not in evidence, speculation Unfair characterization Speculation Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Speculation Speculation Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), speculation, best evidence Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), speculation, best evidence Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), speculation, best evidence Relevance Relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Legal conclusion, relevance Relevance Vague, speculation

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 26 of 40

707:2-7 708:18-709:2 709:8-13 710:15-20 711:12-18 714:11-18 715:22-25 728:1-7 728:8-729:4 729:5-730:25 May 8, 2002 220:1-13 August 11, 2004 4745:1-10 4749:1-15 4764:22-25 4772:1 4772:21-25

Speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Speculation Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), best evidence Vague Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance Relevance Unfair characterization, relevance Relevance

Relevance

Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance

26

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 27 of 40

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony May 1, 2002 27:23-28:6 41:3-24 68:1-71:25 75:16-25 80:1 89:1-15 157:18-159:25 170:1-174:5 May 2, 2002 282:1-12 289:2-291:18 300:10-305:22 307:25-310:17 317:24-318:21 May 7, 2002 592:14-19 609:2-22 625:16-626:11 May 7, 2002 25:2-21 31:4-18 May 8, 2002 70:18-71:20 146:14-147:8 155:4-16 172:12-23 211:24-216:2 221:1-2 228:19-229:20

27

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 28 of 40

256:11-257:10 260:3-261:24 Trial Testimony August 11, 2004 4722:23-25 4724:5-25 4727:1-4732:25 4735:9-25 4738:1-3 4740:16-25 4746:1-3 4746:23-4747:15 4753:11-4754:9 4755:23-4756:12 4760:16-4760:25 4763:1-4 4763:21-25 4765:13-4766:13 4780:19-4782:12 4784:2-11 4788:20-4789:24

ROBERT L. MORGAN Objections: Designation March 21, 2002 42:2 - 43:23 46:18-24 48:2 - 49:2 74:9-23 108:3 - 109:15 138:22 - 141:4 Foundation, legal conclusion Relevance Relevance Foundation, legal conclusion Vague, relevance Foundation Objection

28

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 29 of 40

204:20-24 208:8 - 209:12 March 22, 2002 223:6 - 224:1 225:19 - 227:16 313:18 - 315:1 June 25, 2002 135:6-14 August 3, 2004 3670:19 - 3675:23 Counter-designations: March 21, 2002 52:9-54:25 61:1-63:4 99:22-103:25 116:2-117:21 130:20-132:14 149:21-152:1 154:20-156:15 March 22, 2002 299:2-299:21 June 25, 2002 131:17-132:16 144:9-145:11

Legal conclusion Relevance

Speculation Foundation, speculation Vague, foundation

Foundation

Relevance

29

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 30 of 40

THOMAS POLLOG Objections: Designation April 11, 2002 181:7-22 April 12, 2002 105:1-25 109:1-25 136:17-24 137:4-25 144:1-25 174:1-177:19 May 16, 2002 277:9-278:14 281:1-25 294:1-295:25 299:3-25 306:1-25 309:1-25 319:1-320:25 322:1-25 324:5-10 330:14 Legal conclusion, foundation, vague, speculation Vague, relevance Speculation, best evidence, foundation Foundation, vague Foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation, best evidence Best evidence Mischaracterizes prior testimony Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion, vague, mischaracterizes prior testimony 30 Legal conclusion, foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) deposition notice) Legal conclusion, foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) deposition notice) Legal conclusion Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 20(b)(6) deposition notice), speculation, vague, legal conclusion Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 20(b)(6) deposition notice) Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 20(b)(6) deposition notice), relevance Foundation (beyond scope of RCFC 30(b)(6)) Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 31 of 40

345:1-25 347:1-25 377:7-25 385:4-387:24 393:1-25 410:1-413:25 415:1-416:25 431:1-432:25 437:1-439:25 492:1-25 557:1-559:25 563:1-564:25 576:1-577:25 604:1-605:25 659:1-25 667:1-669:25 August 4, 2004 3956:21-3957:6 3963:1-3964:24 3968:4-14 3971:15-22 4037:13-4039:21

Relevance Assumes facts not in evidence Relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance Vague, compound Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation, foundation Relevance Legal conclusion, best evidence, foundation, relevance Legal conclusion, foundation, vague, relevance Foundation, speculation, relevance Legal conclusion, foundation, relevance Foundation, relevance Vague, best evidence, speculation, relevance

Hearsay Hearsay Hearsay Hearsay Vague

31

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 32 of 40

Counter-designations: April 11, 2002 31:1-34:5 41:5:-44:15 60:1-63:18 64:22-67:13 74:10-19 92:12-93:9 107:1-108:2 123:15-124:10 144:3-145:15 151:14-154:16 155:18-156:13 158:16-172:12 174:1-22 183:4-184:2 185:2-186:22 191:8-192:23 206:16-208:6 210:24-211:22 212:3-213:19 April 12, 2002 9:25-16:17 21:17-24:21 37:15-41:8 43:24-45:3 49:14-25 91:4-92:10 100:22-110:1 115:11-116:20 117:11-118:18 160:12-162:19 163:5-19 May 16, 2002 320:15-321:7 322:20-323:17 381:1-25 409:1-25 32

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 33 of 40

414:1-25 417:1-418:13 May 22, 2002 575:5-25 599:9-600-11 ROBERT M. ROSSELLI Objections: Designation April 15, 2002 93:11-94:13 95:15-96:25 141:12-18 143:15-144:2 147:8-148:9 149:2-17 Foundation, speculation Relevance Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Objection

Counter-designations: April 15, 2002 48:6-17 68:9-71:16 93:20-94:10 134:23-138:14 158:5-162:18 April 16, 2002 193:25-196:14 263:23-264:6 296:8-300:22

33

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 34 of 40

BEN RUSCHE Objections: Designation May 16, 2002 42:1 - 49:25 154:2 - 161:25 170:1 - 173:25 242:1 - 249:25 298:1 - 300:19 May 17, 2002 329:1 - 332:25 337:1 - 344:22 365:1 - 380:22 Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony May 16, 2002 161:16-162:21 174:5-185:4 187:25-189:15 219:15-220:21 230:17-233:23 271:1-274:8 289:16-293:3 295:12-296:21 297:3-298:7 May 17, 2002 436:18-438:14 Speculation Foundation, hearsay, speculation, relevance Foundation, hearsay, speculation, relevance Speculation, legal conclusion, relevance Legal conclusion, relevance Speculation, relevance Foundation, relevance Relevance Objection

34

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 35 of 40

Trial Testimony August 3, 2004 3697:4-9 3713:14-23 3721:21-3723:4 3728:24-3729:19

NANCY SLATER-THOMPSON (MONTGOMERY) Objections: Designation June 13, 2002 94:4-15 96:17 - 99:6 101:11-19 106:1-110:24 111:13-21 112:4-15 112:16-113:16 162:1-11 Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague Foundation, vague Legal conclusion Foundation Legal conclusion Vague Vague Objection

Counter-designations: April 21, 1999 32:23-33:6 82:10-15 82:19-83:10 106:16-108:10 164:23-165:13 176:11-25

35

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 36 of 40

April 22, 1999 245:17-246:4 251:23-253:10 253:22-254:11 257:23-259:24 June 13, 2002 87:24-89:4 VICTOR TREBULES Objections: Designation April 17, 2002 19:5-35:7 42:1-21 52:1-61:1 131:16-132:22 160:1-161:22 April 18, 2002 328:3-12 April 18, 2002 (Yankee Atomic deposition) 18:22-24:10 Counter-designations: April 17, 2002 16:2-17 42:5-43:17 76:17-77:22 78:1-81:20 84:12-88:6 36 Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, foundation, vague, speculation Foundation Legal conclusion Objections

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 37 of 40

96:19-103:22 113:18-116:14 146:12-148:21 173:2-176:9 180:7-186:22 207:1-15 April 18, 2002 302:21-305:14 380:3-382:14 April 18, 2002 (Yankee Atomic deposition) 125:20-127:13 DAVID K. ZABRANSKY Objections: Designation April 17, 2002 30:6-42:22 46:3-54:18 59:2-60:17 64:10-65:8 77:4-80:16 85:9-95:12 99:22-101:10 110:10-111:6 130:1-131:18 158:5-160:9 183:6-184:22 292:1-293:5 37 Legal conclusion, vague, best evidence, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, speculation Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, vague, speculation Legal conclusion, foundation, vague Legal conclusion, speculation, vague Legal conclusion, foundation Legal conclusion Speculation, vague Legal conclusion Vague, legal conclusion Objection

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 38 of 40

295:6-299:22 300:1-306:22 318:18-330:22 334:6-368:22

Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague Foundation, legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, best evidence, vague, foundation, assumes facts not in evidence, speculation, relevance Relevance, vague Legal conclusion, vague, assumes facts not in evidence Legal conclusion, vague

371:1-381:22 417:12-439:21 455:1-8 April 19, 2002 636:1-639:11 668:1-671:22 681:1-685:21 717:1-718:18 June 6, 2002 241:7-248:8 385:11-386:2 April 12, 2005 13:6-14:20 20:7-13 26:1-14 30:1-37:17 59:1-16 61:7-63:3 70:1-71:22 75:1-76:22

Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, foundation Legal conclusion, foundation, vague Relevance

Legal conclusion, foundation Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion

Relevance Vague Legal conclusion, foundation, speculation Foundation, speculation, relevance, vague Legal conclusion, foundation Legal conclusion Relevance Relevance

38

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 39 of 40

Counter-designations: Deposition Testimony April 17, 2002 55:1-56:22 60:20-61:5 128:10-129:18 131:19-132:4 150:4-155:21 161:1-162:8 157:2-158:4 183:19-185:5 197:4-199:10 April 18, 2002 242:10-246:19 249:6-253:12 254:9-19 266:21-267:20 293:20-295:5 330:16-331:20 395:18-396:21 412:20-414:16 449:7-451:18 April 19, 2002 628:15-631:22 639:12-640:8 648:15-651:20 June 6, 2002 229:7-231:20 234:6-240:19 April 12, 2005 16:9-17:17 25:1-22

39

Case 1:98-cv-00614-JFM

Document 325-2

Filed 03/16/2006

Page 40 of 40

Trial Testimony August 5, 2004 4124:24-4126:8 4128:18-4130:4 4155:19-4157:6 4158:1-4159:1 4159:21-4160:16 4161:19-4162:9 4189:25-4192:4 4222:15-4226:3

40