Free Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 1 of 16

Objections and Counter-designations LAKE BARRETT Objections: Designation April 22, 2002 59:4-11 149:5-21 159:16-160:19 260:4-261:15 April 26, 2002 795:4-796:3 May 8, 2002 1050:1-12 1064:19-1065:12 May 10, 2002 1149:22-1151:14 1165:6-22 1295:10-1296:16 1332:19-1335:10 May 14, 2002 67:20-68:21 90:16-91:8 120:22-124:2 140:8-142:7 142:14-143:2 144:14-145:4 173:16-176:9 176:14-178:12 14 Objection Speculation, foundation Foundation, vague Foundation, legal conclusion Foundation, speculation Foundation, argumentative Foundation, legal conclusion Legal conclusion Vague as to term "rely" Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Foundation Foundation, speculation, legal conclusion Vague, speculation Foundation, speculation, vague Vague, foundation Legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion Vague, speculation Vague, legal conclusion

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 2 of 16

May 15, 2002 364:20-365:11 394:11-400:17 Counter-designations: April 22, 2002 121:8-21 137:17-18 May 8, 2002 1044:1-1064:22 May 10, 2002 1152:20-1154:22 May 14, 2002 66:21-67:14 69:8-70:8 72:19-73:9 87:7-22 126:1-132:13 134:19-135:22 143:12-144:13 May 15, 2002 363:25-364:19

Speculation Speculation, vague, legal conclusion

15

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 3 of 16

RONALD MILNER Objections: Designation May 1, 2002 73:10-22 129:22-130:3 130:5-18 May 2, 2002 217:8-16 217:18-22 May 3, 2002 418:18-22 419:15-20 476:16-477:1 477:7-13 574:12-19 574:20-575:4 575:5-19 May 7, 2002 15:6-13 17:5-20 17:22-18:10 19:5-23 20:22-21:4 Objection legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Speculation, compound Vague, relevance Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), speculation, relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Speculation, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion, speculation Best evidence Best evidence Speculation, legal conclusion, relevance Best evidence Speculation

16

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 4 of 16

21:6-14 22:14-19 23:8-19 24:14-25:1 37:9-18 May 8, 2002 194:22-195:10 195:12-196:3 225:12-24 228:23-229:3 229:5-9 229:11-20 262:14-21 266:23-267:1 267:2-4 267:5-10 267:11-16 267:17-268:2 268:4-9 268:10-269:6 269:8-14 269:25-270:4 269:6-11 270:17-20 17

Speculation, relevance Best evidence Legal conclusion Best evidence Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion, relevance Vague, speculation, relevance Mischaracterizes prior testimony, relevance Foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Best evidence Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Speculation, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Speculation, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Speculation, legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Speculation, legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Relevance

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 5 of 16

270:21-271:5 270:6-11 270:12-18 270:19-22 273:5-274:1 274:15-2 275:4-15 285:13-20 Possible Rebuttal Deposition Designation May 3, 2002 574:5-10 May 7, 2002 28:11-29:4 29:23-30:8 31:4-18 May 8, 2002 155:4-16 155:18-156:1

Relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Speculation, legal conclusion, relevance Relevance Relevance Relevance Objection Speculation

Best evidence, legal conclusion Best evidence, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness), legal conclusion Legal conclusion Best evidence, legal conclusion, foundation (not 30(b)(6) witness) Legal conclusion

Counter-designations: May 1, 2002 68:25-69:12 107:22-108:25 132:2-133:4 139:11-139:25 140:15-140:24 May 2, 2002

18

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 6 of 16

301:10-310:18 304:5-304:15 305:2-305:22 317:24-318:21 325:24-326:7 330:23-332:24 391:13-392:17 393:5-394:19 396:2-397:2 May 3, 2002 417:11-418:16 419:1-419:14 435:16-436:5 440:13-441:2 441:21-443:8 443:16-444:8 448:2-448:8 450:12-451:18 454:11-455:22 465:14-465:25 475:8-476:15 486:12;-486:20 487:12-448:5 488:14-489:10 493:4-496:8 506:7-507:7 512:5-512:15 513:2-513:21 514:4-514:13 514:22-515:18 May 7, 2002 592:14-592:19 May 7, 2002 6:9-10:18 32:21-33:24 38:10-40:3 40:12-40:19 19

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 7 of 16

41:8-42:1 42:6-43:8 May 8, 2002 52:8-53:19 56:23-59:19 61:18-62:15 73:10-73:24 77:3-77:20 90:7-90:24 98:8-98:19 99:8-100:3 100:18-102:1 103:1-105:24 106:7-106:20 136:17-137:8 138:6-138:25 174:5-175:11 184:17-186:11 193:13-194:20 196:8-196:24 197:23-198:4 202:15-203:4 204:1-207:12 208:7-209:5 210:2-211:7 211:24-216:2 220:14-220:24 233:7-234:9 256:11-257:10 271:23-272:3 272:14-273:4 279:10-280:3 280:12-281:2

20

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 8 of 16

SUSAN KLEIN Objections: Designation April 24, 2002 62:9-14 172:7-14 196:1-17 April 25, 2002 351:6-352:21 354:1-16 388:11-389:12 524:17-525:8 Counter-designations: April 24, 2002 57:10-15 April 25, 2002 354:17-355:13 435:16-438:22 451:18-452:18 468:11-469:3 440:20-448:1 490:13-492:9 Objection Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice1 Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice, legal conclusion Beyond the scope of RCFC 30(b)(6) notice

Exhibit 1 to Ms. Klein's deposition identifies the topics upon which she was designated to testify as the Government's RCFC 30(b)(6) witness. Appendix at 8. 21

1

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 9 of 16

ALAN BROWNSTEIN Objections: Designation April 9, 2002 33:7-36:19 61:16-62:12 99:25-100:17 144:14-18 April 10, 2002 343:17-344:8 441:5-443:19 455:24-457:14 May 23, 2002 104:18-107:13 June 14, 2002 342:20-343:20 Possible Rebuttal Deposition Designations April 9, 2002 54:1-55:20 64:5-16 146:23-148:9 April 10, 2002 376:22-378:5 May 23, 2002 152:6-155:25 165:7-167:3 214:17-220:17 Objection Overbroad Legal conclusion, mischaracterization, vague Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague Speculation, foundation Vague, speculation Speculation, misleading Compound, vague, foundation Argumentative, mischaracterization Objection Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, foundation Legal conclusion Legal conclusion, vague, mischaracterization, foundation

22

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 10 of 16

June 14, 2002 423:20-428:5

Legal conclusion, speculation, mischaracterization

Counter-designations: April 9, 2002 54:1-55:20 59:1-61:6 62:24-64:21 75:19-77:19 79:4-20 88:5-89:8 115:14-117:18 132:18-133:2 194:4-197:17 April 10, 2002 294:7-295:19 319:19-320:11 391:18-393:2 395:16-398:24 412:5-21 443:10-444:8

April 11, 2002 547:5-24 549:7-552:14 554:25-556:25 562:4-564:17 564:18-576:2 582:13-583:14 585:16-588:10 595:19-597:1 599:1-601:25 623:10-626:4 637:4-640:14 696:24-698:1 724:25-725:24 23

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 11 of 16

May 23, 2002 20:3-19 23:14-24:10 25:4-28-12 33:17-37-19 110:14-113:8 140:3-9 140:15-25 195:21-196:15 226:1-229:11 June 14, 2002 253:19-255:10 287:21-288:1 295:6-298:5 308:6-25 317:11-320:24 395:14-397:24 422:24-424:3 437:10-438:7

24

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 12 of 16

ROBERT CAMPBELL Objections: Designation June 13, 2002 84:19-24 94:3-95:22 150:12-152:24 165:10-168:16 204:2-23 205:18-206:16 June 14, 2002 285:23-286:10 415:19-416:23 444:20-445:3 Objection Speculation Calls for a legal conclusion; Foundation; Speculation Speculation Foundation; Vague as to "important" Speculation Speculation Foundation; Speculation; Vague as to "acceptable state of affairs" Vague as to "sound policy" and "desirable"; Vague as to "moved" and "comparable" Calls for a legal conclusion

Counter-designations: June 13, 2002 19:17-21:1 59:18-60:3 76:11-77:21 80:8-81:1 87:5-88:22 95:25-96:11 113:17-114:15 June 14, 2002 392:12-393:9 396:19-397:9 412:23-413:16 25

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 13 of 16

January 29, 2003 565:14-25 632:8-16 May 6, 2004 81:18-83:21 115:3-118:12

26

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 14 of 16

NANCY SLATER-THOMPSON Objections: Designation June 13, 2002 8:11-15 112:4-15 125:9-17 Possible Rebuttal Deposition Designation June 13, 2002 97:6-99:6 109:3-110:13 159:7-160:2 Counter-designations: April 21, 1999 54:19-58:7 68:10-19 68:24-70:17 73:19-74:13 82:10-15 82:18-83:10 130:5-130:19 132:18-133:24 133:25-135:12 164:23-165:13 176:11-25 195:16-199:9 April 22, 1999 212:1-214:10 214:11-215:1 220:7-221:3 225:25-226:24 27 Objection Vague Legal conclusion Vague Objection Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion, vague Legal conclusion

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 15 of 16

230:17-231:4 237:15-239:3 245:17-246:4 251:23-253:10 253:22-254:11 257:23-259:24 265:4-268:21 June 13, 2002 43:21-44:12 61:18-62:20 87:24-89:4 92:19-93:20 114:13-117:18 119:4-119:17 125:18-126:15 131:12-21 138:4-139:2 145:11-22 149:9-153:21 158:18-160:3 160:18-162:11

28

Case 1:98-cv-00126-JFM

Document 849-4

Filed 07/29/2004

Page 16 of 16

VICTOR TREBULES Objections: Designation Apr. 19, 2002 4:22-5:20 Counter-designations: April 17, 2002 42:10-45:17 52:11-54:4 93:18-96:18 97:1-103:22 113:18-116:14 122:10-124:18 146:12-148:1 April 18, 2002 268:4-270:8 273:12-274:14 302:10-306:16 381:5-382:14 39:5-22 (afternoon session); April 19, 2002 5:21-8:19 Objection Vague, as to the term "economically efficient"

29