Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 20.3 kB
Pages: 3
Date: August 10, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 689 Words, 4,254 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/13511/190.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims ( 20.3 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:98-cv-00726-EJD

Document 190

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

GRASS VALLEY TERRACE, a California Limited Partnership, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

File Nos. 98-726C, 98-726-2C through 98-726-14C, and 04-1299C & 04-1317C Chief Judge Edward J. Damich

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Grass Valley Terrace, et al., hereby move the Court for leave to file the Amended Complaint being submitted contemporaneously herewith. Specifically, Plaintiffs seek to amend their Complaint to reflect (1) the substitution of D&G Apartments, for Plaintiff Eileen Kothe, who is deceased, and (2) the substitution of Mr. James A. Hardee, the personal representative of Plaintiff Margorie Kassner's Estate, for Ms. Kassner, who is deceased. Counsel for plaintiffs has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the filing of this motion, and Defendant does not oppose the present motion. DISCUSSION On May 17, 2005, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Substitution of Plaintiff Eileen Kothe. On the same date, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Substitution of Plaintiff Margorie Kassner. The Court granted both motions in companion Orders issued on January 31, 2006. In those Orders, the Court directed the Clerk to change the caption of the case to reflect the substitution of these two parties. (Since that time, the official caption of the cases has been so modified by the Clerk.) The Court also ordered Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint reflecting the substitution of these parties on or before February 28, 2006.

Case 1:98-cv-00726-EJD

Document 190

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 2 of 3

Prior to that time, however, this case was formally referred to the Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") program, where settlement negotiations related to numerous related cases were proceeding before the Honorable Marian Blank Horn. See Order of February 23, 2006. On the same date, the Court issued a Notice of Assignment pursuant to Appendix H of the Court's rules referring the case to the ADR program, with instructions that no further filings should be made in the underlying case. See Notice of Assignment to Marian Blank Horn, ADR Judge (Feb. 23, 2006) ("No filings with the Clerk by the court or the parties are contemplated under the Alternative Dispute Resolution procedures other than scheduling orders, if appropriate, or an order or stipulation providing for final disposition of the case."). Plaintiffs therefore did not file an amended complaint in this matter subsequent to the referral of the case to ADR. As the Court is aware, the ADR process has proven successful and the parties are working to finalize and obtain approval for a settlement agreement that will encompass this case and nearly 250 related cases pending before the Court. Prior to executing the settlement agreement, the parties are striving to ensure that there is no uncertainty regarding the identity of the plaintiffs whose claims are encompassed by, and therefore will be resolved by, the settlement agreement. Therefore, Plaintiffs request leave to file an Amended Complaint to reflect the substituted parties as set forth in the Court's Order of January 31, 2006. Amendment of the Complaint at this time is appropriate and will ensure that all parties, as well as the Court, can be certain as to the identity of the parties whose claims are included within the settlement agreement. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant this motion for leave to file the Amended Complaint being submitted contemporaneously herewith.

-2-

Case 1:98-cv-00726-EJD

Document 190

Filed 08/10/2006

Page 3 of 3

Dated: August 10, 2006 Filed Electronically

Respectfully submitted, s/ Jeff H. Eckland JEFF H. ECKLAND Mark J. Blando, Of Counsel ECKLAND & BLANDO LLP 500 Lumber Exchange 10 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 236-0160 Facsimile: (612) 236-0179 Jerry W. Snider, Of Counsel William L. Roberts, Of Counsel Mark D. Savin, Of Counsel FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 2200 Wells Fargo Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 766-7000 Facsimile: (612) 766-1600 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

M2:20812536.01

-3-