Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 16.2 kB
Pages: 4
Date: November 14, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 610 Words, 3,954 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/1477/57.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 16.2 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:02-cv-01460-LB

Document 57

Filed 11/14/2005

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS HERMES CONSOLIDATED, INC., Doing Business As Wyoming Refining Company, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 02-1460C (Judge Block)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Pursuant to RCFC 6(b), defendant respectfully requests an enlargement of time of seven days (five business days), from November 14, 2005, to and including November 21, 2005, within which to file its motion for summary judgment. This is our first request for an enlargement for this purpose. Plaintiff does not oppose this request. Although our brief in this case is not in final form, this day, we are filing a very similar brief in El Paso v. United States, No. 02-1094C (Block, J.). That case is, as this one is, one of the approximately 30 "jet-fuel"cases now before this Court. It involves approximately 14 discrete legal issues, including all of the issues contained in this case, and more. Since the Court's order establishing the schedule in this case, defendant's counsel has devoted most of his time to El Paso and this case and other matters before this Court, including, among other things: preparing our brief in El Paso (electing to prioritize it over this case, because it involved more issues than this case); hearings or meetings concerning the other jet-fuel cases; preparing issue papers, and conducting meetings and settlement discussions in Rocky Mountain v. United States, No. 04-1434, a case involving a complex regulatory scheme driven by complicated actuarial questions, in which the parties have been involved in intensive alternative bilateral dispute procedures under this Court's close supervision; participating in settlement planning in

Case 1:02-cv-01460-LB

Document 57

Filed 11/14/2005

Page 2 of 4

Christofferson v. United States, No. 01-495C, a case involving the individual claims of approximately 8000 former Federal employees, that also involves a complicated alternative dispute procedure; and negotiating a settlement in Briggs v. United Sates, No. 01-552C (Fed. Cl.). Defendant's counsel also is scheduled to file three other joint filings in this Court on November 14. We seek one week, because the same agency people required to assist us in this case, including reviewing files, identifying appendix materials, and supplying declarations, are assisting us in El Paso. When that brief is filed, they will turn their attention to this case. One critical agency member is on pre- scheduled leave until mid week. During this same period, defendant's counsel is scheduled to participate in two hearings and two meetings in matters involving this Court. For these reasons, defendant respectfully requests an enlargement of time of seven days, from November 14, 2005, to and including November 21, 2005, within which to fie its motion for summary judgment. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General

s/ David M. Cohen DAVID M. COHEN Director

-2-

Case 1:02-cv-01460-LB

Document 57

Filed 11/14/2005

Page 3 of 4

OF COUNSEL: BERNARD A. DUVAL Counsel HOWARD M. KAUFER Assistant Counsel Office of Counsel Defense Energy Support Center Ft. Belvoir, VA

s/ Steven J. Gillingham STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM Senior Trial Counsel

Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 616-2311 Fax: (202) 353-7988 Attorneys for Defendant

November 14, 2005

-3-

Case 1:02-cv-01460-LB

Document 57

Filed 11/14/2005

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 14, 2005, a copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system. s/ Steven J. Gillingham