Free Reply to Objections to Bill of Costs - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 37.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: April 18, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 232 Words, 1,962 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/1488/90-2.pdf

Download Reply to Objections to Bill of Costs - District Court of Federal Claims ( 37.1 kB)


Preview Reply to Objections to Bill of Costs - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:02-cv-01500-GWM

Document 90-2

Filed 04/18/2007

Page 1 of 3

No. 02-1500C (Judge George W. Miller)

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director KATHRYN A. BLEECKER Assistant Director JAMES W. POIRIER Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 1100 L Street, NW, 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Telephone: (202) 616-0856 Facsimile: (202) 514-7969 Attorneys for Defendant April 18, 2007

Case 1:02-cv-01500-GWM

Document 90-2

Filed 04/18/2007

Page 2 of 3

TABLE OF CONTENT PAGE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................... ii DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS .......................................... 1 I. II. Rule 68 Mandates An Award Of Costs .................. 2 Rule 68 Applies Even After Liability Is Established ...................................... 3

III. There Is No "Attractive Offer" Requirement .......... 5 IV. The Motion For Sanctions Lacks Any Rational Basis ... 9

CONCLUSION ................................................... 11

i

Case 1:02-cv-01500-GWM

Document 90-2

Filed 04/18/2007

Page 3 of 3

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE(S) Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August, 450 U.S. 346 (1981) ................................

passim

Prowest Diversified, Inc. v. United States, 40 Fed. Cl. 879 (1998) ............................... STATUTES

6, 8

28 U.S.C. ยง 2412(b) ..........................................

8

RULES

Rule 11 ..................................................... Rule 68 .................................................

10

passim

ii