Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 29.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 509 Words, 3,036 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/8913/8-1.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Delaware ( 29.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:04-cv-01561-KAJ

Document 8

Filed 03/31/2005

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BRIAN TURNER, Petitioner, v. THOMAS L. CARROLL, Warden, and M. JANE BRADY, Attorney General for the State of Delaware, Respondents. : : : : : : : : : : : :

Civ. Act. No. 04-1561-KAJ

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respondents move for an extension of time in which to file an answer to the petition. In support thereof, respondents state the following: 1. The petitioner, Brian Turner, has applied for federal habeas relief, challenging his

October 2002 conviction after a bench trial in Delaware Superior Court for trafficking in cocaine. D.I. 1, 3; Turner v. State, 826 A.2d 289 (Del. 2003). By the terms of the Court's order, the answer is due to be filed on April 4, 2005. 2. During the last several weeks, counsel for respondents has been working diligently on

an answer to a brief in a capital case due to be filed next week in the Delaware Supreme Court. Further, the undersigned has been out of the office for several days on a previously scheduled vacation. In addition, the undersigned has been and continues to be working on other cases before this Court and the state courts. In light of the situation, additional time is needed to complete the answer and have it reviewed in the ordinary course of business.

Case 1:04-cv-01561-KAJ

Document 8

Filed 03/31/2005

Page 2 of 3

3.

Under Habeas Rule 4, the Court has the discretion to give respondents an extension of

time exceeding the 40-day limit in Civil Rule 81(a)(2). Clutchette v. Rushen, 770 F.2d 1469, 147374 & n.4 (9th Cir. 1985); Kramer v. Jenkins, 108 F.R.D. 429, 431-32 (N.D. Ill. 1985). The comment to Rule 4 expressly states that the district court has "the discretion to take into account various factors such as the respondents' workload" in determining the period of time that should be allowed to answer the petition. 4. 5. This is respondents' first request for an extension of time in this case. Respondents submit that an extension of time to and including May 6, 2005 in which

to file an answer is reasonable. Respondents submit herewith a proposed order.

DATE: March 31, 2005

/s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8500 Del. Bar. ID No. 3759

Case 1:04-cv-01561-KAJ

Document 8

Filed 03/31/2005

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 31, 2005, I electronically filed a motion for extension of time and attachments with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I hereby certify that on March 31, 2005, I have mailed by United States Service, the documents to the following non-registered participant: Brian Turner SBI No. 252136 Delaware Correctional Center 1181 Paddock Road Smyrna, DE 19977

/s/ Elizabeth R. McFarlan Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 577-8500 Del. Bar. ID No. 3759