Case 1:04-cv-00471-EJD
Document 18
Filed 09/06/2005
Page 1 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS J.H. PARKER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.
No. 04-471C (Judge Damich)
DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Defendant, the United States, respectfully requests that the Court grant an enlargement of time of 180 days to all dates in the current schedule. The current schedule is set forth in an This is the first motion for this
order, dated April 15, 2005. purpose.
Counsel for the plaintiff, J.H. Parker Construction
Company, Inc. ("Parker"), has authorized us to state that Parker does not oppose this motion. Counsel for the parties have worked together in a spirit of cooperation, and have made progress during this summer. Many
documents have been exchanged, and where document production has not been complete, the parties have agreed upon a process to expedite the completion of the document exchange. The United
States has hired a schedule expert, and his work has begun. Parker has informed us that it has nearly completed a claim for damages. Prior to the arrival of Hurricane Katrina, the Franklin
County Dam project was nearing completion, and the United States
Case 1:04-cv-00471-EJD
Document 18
Filed 09/06/2005
Page 2 of 5
anticipated making a claim for reprocurement costs against Parker (and so, against the surety). However, even before the arrival
of Hurricane Katrina, progress in the litigation was not quite what the parties had hoped when the schedule was proposed to the Court last spring. The contract at issue in this case concerns a dam in Franklin County, Mississippi -- not far from the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Since Hurricane Katrina arrived, neither counsel
has been able to contact relevant personnel in Franklin County. Both counsel anticipate that the people in Franklin County will have other concerns in addition to this litigation during the coming weeks. The full enlargement requested is needed. The parties are
endeavoring to resolve all issues related to this case, including damages, in one proceeding. within the scope of the case. needed for discovery. following schedule: 1. Fact discovery should be completed by April 13, 2006. At this time, no damages issues are Furthermore, additional time is
Accordingly, we respectfully request the
All requests pursuant to RCFC 31, 33, 34 and 36 served after March 13, 2006 shall be deemed untimely. 2. The party with the burden of proof regarding an issue
shall disclose its testifying experts, the information required -2-
Case 1:04-cv-00471-EJD
Document 18
Filed 09/06/2005
Page 3 of 5
by RCFC 26(a)(2), and all expert reports by April 28, 2006. 3. All rebuttal experts, required information, and expert
reports shall be disclosed by May 30, 2006. 4. All expert discovery shall be completed by
June 14, 2006. 5. Summary judgment motions, if any, shall be filed by
July 14, 2006. 6. A status conference shall be held on or about July 24,
2006 to discuss the status of the case, and to establish any necessary pretrial schedule. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General
DAVID M. COHEN Director
S/Bryant G. Snee BRYANT G. SNEE Assistant Director
-3-
Case 1:04-cv-00471-EJD
Document 18
Filed 09/06/2005
Page 4 of 5
S/ James W. Poirier JAMES W. POIRIER Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor, 1100 L St, N.W Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: 202-307-6289 Fax: 202-514-7969 September 6, 2005 Attorneys for Defendant
-4-
Case 1:04-cv-00471-EJD
Document 18
Filed 09/06/2005
Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on September 8, 2005, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this
filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. the Court's system. S/ James W. Poirier Parties may access this filing through