Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 56.1 kB
Pages: 5
Date: June 8, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 751 Words, 4,626 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/17775/5.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims ( 56.1 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:04-cv-00636-LB

Document 5

Filed 06/08/2004

Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS METRICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 04-636C (Judge Block)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Defendant respectfully requests the Court to enlarge by 30 days, to and including July 8, 2004, the time within which it must file its response to the complaint. Defendant's response is presently due on June 8, 2004. This

is defendant's first request for an enlargement of time for this purpose. Plaintiff does not oppose this motion.

Government counsel has yet to receive a litigation report from the agency involved in the events that led to this litigation. Government counsel has no personal

knowledge of the matters addressed in the complaint and cannot prepare the Government's answer without input from the agency. The agency is preparing a litigation report and

expects to deliver the litigation report to the Government's attorney of record on or about June 25, 2004.1 The time

The Army attorney who was preparing the litigation report left the Army before he could complete this report. As a result, the Army has had to re-assign this task to another attorney. This has delayed completion of the litigation report.

1

Case 1:04-cv-00636-LB

Document 5

Filed 06/08/2004

Page 2 of 5

requested is necessary, therefore, for Government counsel to review the litigation report; prepare a response to the complaint; and obtain agency and supervisory review. The additional time requested is also necessary because, during the next month, Government counsel will be required to devote substantial amounts of time to other matters pending before this Court and the court of appeals. These other matters include: preparing a joint status

report in Alderice v. United States, No. 03-722C (Fed. Cl.), which is due on June 18, 2004; preparing the Government's brief in Hauck v. Principi, No. 04-7067 (Fed. Cir.), which is due, after one 30-day enlargement, on June 24, 2004; preparing the Government's brief in McGruder v. United States, No. 03-441C (Fed. Cl.), which is due, after one 28-day enlargement, on June 29, 2004; preparing a joint stipulation for the conduct of overseas depositions in Monarch Assurance, P.L.C. v. United States, No. 94-518C (Fed. Cl.), which will be due on July 1, 2004, if the Court accepts the joint schedule proposed in the Government's recent status report; representing the Government in settlement discussions in Nicon, Inc. v. United States, No. 99-982C (Fed. Cl.), which will be required to be completed by June 21, 2004, if the Court grants our pending motion for enlargement; and representing the Government in

-2-

Case 1:04-cv-00636-LB

Document 5

Filed 06/08/2004

Page 3 of 5

settlement discussions in DynCorp Information Systems, LLC v. United States, No. 01-16C (Fed. Cl.), a complex costaccounting case involving a contractor claim for $26 million and a Government claim for $11 million. In addition, on May

26, 2004, Triton Marine Construction, Inc. v. United States, No. 03-1558C (Fed. Cl.), was transferred to Government counsel because the Government's previous attorney of record in that case left the Department of Justice. Government

counsel has been required to devote a substantial amount of time to Triton, to review the file and learn the case upon an expedited basis, and expects that this effort will continue for the foreseeable future. For the foregoing reasons, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant this unopposed motion for an enlargement of time. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General DAVID M. COHEN Director /s Brian M. Simkin BRIAN M. SIMKIN Assistant Director

-3-

Case 1:04-cv-00636-LB

Document 5

Filed 06/08/2004

Page 4 of 5

/s Thomas D. Dinackus THOMAS D. DINACKUS Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor 1100 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Tele: (202) 307-6289 Fax: (202) 514-7969 Attorneys for Defendant OF COUNSEL: LTC CHARLES HAYES MAJ ANISSA N. PAREKH U.S. Army Legal Services Agency June 8, 2004

-4-

Case 1:04-cv-00636-LB

Document 5

Filed 06/08/2004

Page 5 of 5

NOTICE OF FILING I hereby certify that on June 8, 2004, a copy of the foregoing "DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of

this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. filing through the Court's system. /s Thomas D. Dinackus Parties may access this