Free Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:05-cv-00187-JFM

Document 35

Filed 03/02/2006

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS IVAN G. RICE, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 05-187C Senior Judge James F. Merow

DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND ITS REPLY TO HONEYWELL'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION Defendant hereby replies to "Plaintiff Rice's Motion to Amend Reply to Honeywell's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff Rice's Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings" (the Motion) with a corrected Exhibit "A" electronically filed February 21, 2006. Defendant does not object to the proposed substitution of Exhibit "A" and does not oppose the Motion to Amend. Defendant respectfully notes that briefing as to plaintiff's motion to stay proceedings, filed January 4, 2006, now appears to be complete. Respectfully submitted, PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General JOHN FARGO Director March 2, 2006 s/ B. Frederick Buchan, Jr. B. FREDERICK BUCHAN, JR. Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Phone: (202) 307-0335 Facsimile: (202) 307-0345 [email protected] Attorneys for the United States -1-

OF COUNSEL: KEN B. BARRETT Attorney Department of Justice