Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 16.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: November 16, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 748 Words, 4,558 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19629/131-1.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims ( 16.4 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00231-EJD

Document 131

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS No. 05-231 T (Chief Judge Damich) ______________________________ JZ Buckingham Investments LLC as Tax Matters Partner of JBJZ Partners, a South Carolina general partnership, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. __________________________
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR THE UNITED STATES TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL (D.E. 126) AND PLAINTIFF'S CORRECTED AND AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL (DE 129) The United States moves to enlarge the time it has to respond to Plaintiff's First Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 126) and Plaintiff's Corrected and Amended Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 129) from November 19, 2007 and November 26, 2007, to Monday, December 3, 2007. The Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. The United States asks for a response date of December 3, 2007, due to the many issues raised in the original and corrected and amended motions, delays expected to be caused by the Thanksgiving Holiday, and the current ambiguity of when a response is due. The Plaintiff filed its original First Motion to Compel on November 2, 2007. Plaintiff filed its Corrected and Amended Motion to Compel on November 7, 2007, after discovering that

Case 1:05-cv-00231-EJD

Document 131

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 2 of 3

the motion and brief in the original filings did not match. While the original motion (Docket Entry 126) dealt with compelling the Jenkens and Gilchrist Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, the brief discussed the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the United States and the many additional issues raised in the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. Upon discovering the error Plaintiff filed its Corrected and Amended Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 129) along with a motion to file the corrected and amended motion (Docket Entry 128). The Court granted the motion to file the corrected and amended motion on November 15, 2007 (See Docket Entry for November 15, 2007). A response to the First Motion to Compel was originally due November 19, 2007. It is unclear whether a response would be due to the Corrected and Amended Motion to Compel on November 26, 2007 (based on the date filed) or December 3 (based on order granting motion to file corrected and amended motion). The original motion dealt with compelling the United States to provide Jenkens and Gilchrist with information on how a penalty was calculated. The amended and corrected motion asks the United States to provide the information itself, to provide additional information on Treasury Regulations and other tax shelter promoters. The United States was aware at the time Plaintiff filed its First Motion to Compel that the Plaintiff was going to seek to compel the United States to provide the information to Jenkens and Gilchrist. The other relief sought had not been discussed with Plaintiff in months. The United States ask the Court to set an unambiguous date of December 3, 2007, to clarify the due date of the United States' response to Plaintiff's motions, and to provide time to respond to the many issues raised and expected delays cause by the Thanksgiving holiday.

-2-

Case 1:05-cv-00231-EJD

Document 131

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 3 of 3

Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Dennis M. Donohue DENNIS M. DONOHUE Attorney of Record U.S. Department of Justice - Tax Division Court of Federal Claims Section Post Office Box 26 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 (202) 307-5892 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I spoke to Joel Crouch November 8, 2007. He agreed not to oppose this motion to enlarge to December 3, 2007, and the United States agreed not to oppose any motion to enlarge time for Plaintiff to respond to the United States' motion to compel a response to the contention interrogatories to December 10, 2007. s/ Joseph A. Pitizinger, III CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 16, 2007, I electronicly filed the Foregoing Unopposed Motion to Enlarge Time For the United States to Respond to Plaintiff's First Motion to Compel (D.e. 126) and Plaintiff's Corrected and Amended Motion to Compel (De 129) , with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of the filing to the following: Joel N. Crouch, Esq. Meadows, Collier, Reed Cousins & Blau, L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 3700 Dallas, Texas 75202 /s/ Joseph A. Pitizinger, III JOSEPH A. PITZINGER, III Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice 717 North Harwood, Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 880-9728

Page 3 of 3