Free Motion to Strike - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 105.6 kB
Pages: 4
Date: July 10, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 502 Words, 3,165 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19629/184-1.pdf

Download Motion to Strike - District Court of Federal Claims ( 105.6 kB)


Preview Motion to Strike - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00231-EJD

Document 184

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JZ Buckingham Investments LLC as Tax Matters Partner of JBJZ Partners, a South Carolina general partnership, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § §

CASE NO. 05-231 T Chief Judge Edward J. Damich

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF RELEVANT LAW REVIEW ARTICLE The Government recently notified this Court of a law review article that it proclaims is "highly relevant" to these proceedings. Putting aside that the article reads like a legal brief for the Government, the article is both irrelevant and improper. It is irrelevant because it offers only the personal and unqualified opinions of its authors ­ nothing of precedential value to this Court. It is likewise improper because it is the equivalent of opinion testimony by the Government, which is not only unforgivably tardy (more than one year after the exchange of expert reports), but also impermissible as testimony on legal issues. Not surprisingly, one of those legal issues is the validity of the retroactive Treas. Reg. § 1.752-6, which is the subject of a motion pending before this Court. In short, this Court should not allow the Government's thinly-disguised attempt to belatedly supplement its briefing and expert testimony in this case. Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court grant its Motion and strike the Government's Notice of Relevant Law Review Article. Alternatively, Plaintiff requests the opportunity to offer opinion testimony by other respected members of the tax community so that this Court may have a balanced viewpoint.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE Page 1 369431

Case 1:05-cv-00231-EJD

Document 184

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 2 of 4

Respectfully submitted, By: s/Joel N. Crouch Joel N. Crouch Texas State Bar No. 05144220

MEADOWS, COLLIER, REED, COUSINS & BLAU, L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 3700 Dallas, TX 75202 (214) 744-3700 Telephone (214) 747-3732 Facsimile [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE Page 2 369431

Case 1:05-cv-00231-EJD

Document 184

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 3 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On this the 10th day of July, 2008, counsel for Plaintiff contacted counsel for the United States, David Steiner, regarding the relief sought in this Motion. Counsel for the United States stated that it is opposed to the granting of this Motion.

s/Anthony P. Daddino

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE Page 3 369431

Case 1:05-cv-00231-EJD

Document 184

Filed 07/10/2008

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 10, 2008, a copy of the foregoing Motion was served upon counsel listed below via electronic means. Dennis Donahue John Lindquist David M. Steiner United States Department of Justice Tax Division P.O. Box 55 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Joseph Pitzinger, Esq. Jonathan Blacker, Esq. United States Department of Justice Tax Division 717 North Harwood Suite 400 Dallas, Texas 75201 Attorneys for the United States

s/Joel N. Crouch Joel N. Crouch

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE Page 4 369431