Case 1:05-cv-00448-NBF
Document 52-2
Filed 05/22/2007
Page 1 of 5
Terence Murphy
Washington i DC
December 14 i 2006
Page i
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERA CLAIMS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --x
RAYTHEON CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
No. 05-448C
Defendant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --x
Washington, D. C .
Thursday, December 14, 2006
Deposition of TERENCE MUPHY, a witness herein,
called for examination by counsel for Defendant in the
above-entitled matter, pursuant to notice, the witness being duly sworn by DENNIS A. DINKEL, a Notary Public in and for
the District of Columbia, taken at the offices of the U. S.
Department of Justice, 1100 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
at 9:01 a.m., Thursday, December 14, 2006, and the
proceedings being taken down by Stenotype by DENNIS A. DINKEL, FAPR, CRR, and transcribed under his direction.
Alderson Reporting Company
1-800-FOR-DEPO
EXHIBIT 1
0966f177 -fd11-4cef-a6d2-c5b6fde52c43
Case 1:05-cv-00448-NBF
Document 52-2
Filed 05/22/2007
Page 2 of 5
Terence Murphy
Washington, DC
December 14, 2006
Page 2
1
2 3
APPEARCES:
On behalf of the Plaintiff:
4
5
KAEN L. MAOS, ESQ.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
6
7 8 9
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202 - 955 - 8500
On behalf of the Defendant:
10
11
12 13 14
C. COLEMA BIRD, ESQ.
u. S. Department of Justice
1100 L Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530
15 16 17
18
Phone: 202 - 3 07- 0453
LAWRENCE S. RAYNE, ESQ.
Defense Contract Management Agency
1523 West Central Road
19 20
Arlington Heights, IL 60005-2451
21
22
Phone: 224-625-8212
Alderson Reporting Company
1- 800 -FOR-DEPO
0966f177 -fd11-4cef-a6d2-c5b6fde52c43
Case 1:05-cv-00448-NBF
Document 52-2
Filed 05/22/2007
Page 3 of 5
Terence Murphy
Washington, DC
December 14, 2006
Page 151
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
of the date of the segment-closing for purposes of
the CAS 413 segment-closing calculation?
A.
All of the liabilities were put together
by Mercer also.
Q.
And you're not in a position to describe
anything about how they arrived at those numbers i is
that true?
A.
That is correct. i will say this, though.
DCAA did audi t all of those calculations, and I don't
10
believe there's any issues that were raised in the
11 determination of those deficit amounts. As I recall.
12 13
14
Q.
My question, sir, related to the notice of
deposition and the basis for the calculations. I
don't know whether DCAA had subpoena power.
15 16 17
18
MR. BIRD: Let me mark another exhibi t .
I'd like to have the reporter mark as Defendant's
Exhibit No. 6 for identification, a letter dated June 19, 2002, from Mr. Garvey to Mr. John McGrath, which
contains - - it is a one-page letter which contains as
19
20
its sole attachment a letter dated June 13, 2002 from
21
22
Mr. Jonathan R. Barry, F.S.A.E.A. on the letterhead
of Mercer Human Resource Consulting, and an address
Alderson Reporting Company 1 - 800 - FOR-DEPO
0966f177 -fd11-4cef-a6d2-c5b6fde52c43
Case 1:05-cv-00448-NBF
Document 52-2
Filed 05/22/2007
Page 4 of 5
Terence Murphy
Washington, DC
December 14, 2006
Page 194
1 2
3
the analysis done by Mercer.
Can you explain what you did with the
analysis prepared by Mercer and how it formed or how
it went into the claims?
4 5
A.
Mercer is our outside actuary.
In
6 essence, we took the information from Mercer. When
7
8
Mercer provided the information to Raytheon, it was
also provided to DCAA, and I believe the CIPA team
looked at some of those documents that were put
together by Mercer.
9
10
11
12
13 14
They reviewed those because if you look at
all of the documentation that was provided, the
ini tial submissions for these four claims did not
contain any government participation. They only
contained the Mercer package subsequent to that, as
15 16
17 18
when we worked with government participation. So
those were looked at first.
I don't believe there's anything in the
19 20
documentation that took any issue with the
calculations associated with the -- you know, the
21
22
determination of the asset and liability position at
the time of the segment-closing. So we took those
Alderson Reporting Company
1- 800 -FOR-DEPO
0966f177 -fd11-4cef-a6d2-c5b6fde52c43
Case 1:05-cv-00448-NBF
Document 52-2
Filed 05/22/2007
Page 5 of 5
Terence Murphy
Washington, DC
December 14, 2006
Page 195
1
2
3
amounts, those deficit amounts and utilized them in
the claims, and then extended them further as we
researched further information to determine
4
government participation. That's what we did with
5 them.
6
7 8
Q.
Mr. Murphy, do you know who - - if there
was any direct communication between the CIPA team
and Mercer?
9
MR. BIRD: Obj ection to the form. You may
10
answer.
THE WITNESS:
11
12 13 14
I believe there was. Mercer
would confer on occasion with George Matray down in
New York.
BY MS. MAOS:
Q.
15 16
17 18
Do you know who George Matray is?
A.
George Matray works in the insurance group
for DCMA, I believe.
Q.
Is that the same process that was followed
19
20
for the segment-closings where there was a surplus?
A.
Yes, it was.
21
MR. BIRD: Obj ection. Beyond the scope of
22 the direct examination.
Alderson Reporting Company 1 - 800 - FOR-DEPO
0966f177 -fd11-4cef-a6d2-c5b6fde52c43