Free Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(6) - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 35.1 kB
Pages: 3
Date: October 1, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 402 Words, 5,006 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19938/48-2.pdf

Download Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(6) - District Court of Federal Claims ( 35.1 kB)


Preview Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(6) - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00533-MMS

Document 48-2

Filed 10/01/2007

Page 1 of 3

No. 05-533C (Judge Sweeney) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS JEFFREY G. WALLS,

Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR JUDGMENT UPON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ______________________________________________________________________________ PETER D. KEISLER Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM Assistant Director OF COUNSEL: JOHN CLADY Lieutenant Judge Advocate General's Corps Department of the Navy Office of the Judge Advocate General General Litigation Washington, D.C. 20374 CLAUDIA BURKE Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice 1100 L Street, N.W. Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: 202-353-9063 Fax: 202-307-7965 Attorneys for Defendant

October 1, 2007

Case 1:05-cv-00533-MMS

Document 48-2

Filed 10/01/2007

Page 2 of 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE(s) STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 I. II. Nature Of The Case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Statement Of Facts.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

ARGUMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 I. Standard Of Review.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 A. B. II. Motion To Dismiss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Judgment Upon The Administrative Record. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6

Mr. Walls's Amended Complaint Fails To State A Claim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 A. A. Regulatory Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Mr. Walls's Complaint Fails To State A Claim Of Involuntariness. . . . . . 7

III.

The Board's Determination Is Supported By Substantial Evidence. . . . . . . . . . . 12

CONCLUSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

-i-

Case 1:05-cv-00533-MMS Document 48-2 Filed 10/01/2007 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES

Page 3 of 3

PAGE

Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2005). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombley, __ U.S. __, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Carmichael v. United States, 298 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2002). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8, 9 De Cicco v. United States, 230 Ct. Cl. 224, 677 F.2d 66 (1982). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6, 7 Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 310 F. 2d 381 (1962). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Henke v. United States, 60 F.3d 795 (Fed. Cir. 1995). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Lechliter v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 536 (2007). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Lewis v. United States, 67 Fed. Cl. 158 (2005). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 McHenry v. United States, 367 F.3d 1370 (2004).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Metz v. United States, 466 F.3d 991 (Fed. Cir. 2006). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Rigsbee v. United States, 226 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2000). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Skinner v. United States, 594 F.2d 824 (1979).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 U.S. Postal Service v. Gregory, 534 U.S. 1 (2001).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1 (1926).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 (1986). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 STATUTES 10 U.S.C. ยง 6330(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3, 8 -ii-