Free Motion to Stay - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 20.0 kB
Pages: 4
Date: October 20, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 697 Words, 4,317 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/19948/10.pdf

Download Motion to Stay - District Court of Federal Claims ( 20.0 kB)


Preview Motion to Stay - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:05-cv-00545-EJD

Document 10

Filed 10/20/2005

Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

PLATINUM TRADING, LLC, by and through William B. Guzy, A Partner Other Than the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 05-545T Chief Judge Edward J. Damich

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING DECISION IN JADE TRADING, LLC, et al. v. UNITED STATES Plaintiff, Platinum Trading, LLC, ("Platinum" or "Plaintiff"), respectfully moves this Court for a stay of proceeding pending the forthcoming decision in Jade Trading, LLC, et al. v. United States, Fed. Cl. No. 03-2164T. In support of its motion, Platinum states: 1. Plaintiff filed its complaint on May 12, 2005. Defendant filed its answer on

September 7, 2005. 2. Pursuant to ΒΆ 4 of Appendix A of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal

Claims ("RCFC") and RCFC 6(e), the parties' joint preliminary status report is due October 31, 2005.1 3. Jade Trading, LLC, et al. v. United States, No. 03-2164T is currently pending in

this Court before Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. A trial was held in Jade Trading in September 2005 and a decision is forthcoming. This case and Jade Trading involve certain common issues of law. The disposition of this motion will determine whether it will be necessary for the parties to file a motion for enlargement of time to file the joint preliminary status report.
1

1

Case 1:05-cv-00545-EJD

Document 10

Filed 10/20/2005

Page 2 of 4

4.

Staying this case pending the decision in Jade Trading serves judicial economy.

See Haustechnik v. United States, 34 Fed. Cl. 740, 745 (1996) (staying proceedings pending outcome of a German suit because it served judicial economy); Northrop Corp. v. United States, 27 Fed. Cl. 795, 803-805 (1993) (continuing stay because it promoted, inter alia, judicial economy). The decision in Jade Trading is very relevant to the legal issues in this case and this Court will give great deference to the decision in Jade Trading. 5. Moreover, because the cases contain certain factual similarities, staying this case

should reduce discovery with respect to certain issues. See id.; see also Corning Glass Works v. United States, 220 Ct. Cl. 605, 605 (1979) (granting a stay in order "to serve the interest of judicial economy and to avoid duplicative discovery proceedings"). The parties in Jade Trading have exhaustively addressed factual and legal issues before the Court in this case. To proceed with this action prior to the decision in Jade Trading will result in a duplication of efforts and increased cost to the government, Plaintiff, and this Court. See Far West Federal Bank, 930 F.2d 883, 891 (Fed. Cir. 1991) ("In today's climate of burgeoning litigation and strained resources, duplication of litigation serves no congressional purpose; it squanders judicial, governmental, and private resources."). 6. Defendant has no objection to the requested motion to stay but may file a

response to this motion.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to enter an Order staying proceedings pending the decision in Jade Trading, LLC, et al. v. United States. Dated this 20th day of October, 2005.

2

Case 1:05-cv-00545-EJD

Document 10

Filed 10/20/2005

Page 3 of 4

Respectfully submitted, PLATINUM TRADING, LLC

By: Thomas P. Fitzgerald WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 558-5600 tel. (312) 558-5700 fax

s/Thomas P. Fitzgerald One of Its Attorneys

3

Case 1:05-cv-00545-EJD

Document 10

Filed 10/20/2005

Page 4 of 4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that service of the foregoing document was made on this 20th day of October, 2005, by electronically filing a copy with the Court under the CM/ECF system with notification of such filing to opposing counsel, David R. House, Esquire, and by mailing copies thereof, in postage prepaid envelopes, to the tax matters partner at the following addresses:

Sentinel Advisors, LLC Tax Matters Partner Platinum Trading, LLC 546 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10036 Sentinel Advisors, LLC Tax Matters Partner Platinum Trading, LLC 68 Carman Avenue Cedarhurst, NY 11516

s/Karen M. Kowalski Karen M. Kowalski WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 35 West Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 558-5600 tel. (312) 558-5700 fax