Free Joint Status Report - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:05-cv-00631-FMA

Document 21

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________________________________________________ WING MANOR, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STATUS REPORT Pursuant to the Court's Order of August 16, 2006, the parties respectfully submit the following Joint Status Report to apprise the Court of the status of their efforts to resolve this and numerous closely-related cases through the Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") pilot program. This status report addresses the above-captioned case and all of the cases identified in the Court's Order of August 16, 2006. The parties note that the status with respect to each of these cases is the same. As previously reported, the Section 515 Litigation Settlement Agreement (the "Agreement") was fully executed effective May 21, 2007, following which the parties entered the implementation phase of the settlement process. Under the current schedule, the parties expect to complete that process by October 31, 2008. To this end, a third-party appraisal firm has nearly completed the process of preparing a Market Rent Study as required by the Agreement for each of the properties in the settlement. At the same time, the parties have continued to make progress in reaching final market rent conclusions and calculating damages for each property for which a market study has been File No. 05-631 (Judge Francis M. Allegra)

Case 1:05-cv-00631-FMA

Document 21

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 2 of 3

completed. As part of that effort, the parties are in the process of exchanging information necessary for the computation of damages for individual properties. As a result, the parties have reached agreement on the market rents and damages start dates for nearly half of the properties in the settlement, and have further agreed on final damages amounts for numerous properties. Finally, the parties have conferred with one another regarding all aspects of the settlement on a regular basis throughout the settlement process and continue to keep the ADR judge apprised of their progress on a monthly basis. For example, counsel for the parties held extended face-to-face meetings in Washington, D.C. during the week of May 5, 2008 to address a number of key issues regarding the settlement implementation, which was followed by a conference with the ADR judge held on May 16, 2008. The parties have conferred regarding the filing of this document, and counsel for defendant has represented to counsel for plaintiffs that defendant concurs in the contents of this Joint Status Report. Dated: May 27, 2008 Respectfully submitted,

2

Case 1:05-cv-00631-FMA

Document 21

Filed 05/27/2008

Page 3 of 3

Filed Electronically

s/ Jeff H. Eckland JEFF H. ECKLAND Mark J. Blando, Of Counsel ECKLAND & BLANDO LLP 500 Lumber Exchange 10 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 236-0160 Facsimile: (612) 236-0179 Jerry W. Snider, Of Counsel William L. Roberts, Of Counsel FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 2200 Wells Fargo Center Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 766-7000 Facsimile: (612) 766-1600 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

3