Free Response to Motion - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:05-cv-00840-MMS

Document 65-4

Filed 01/05/2007

Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS FISHERMAN'S HARVEST, INC., et al Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES Defendant, v. WEEKS MARINE, INC. Intervenor-Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

NO. 05-840 C and NO. 05-1044 C (Consolidated) (Chief Judge Damich)

JURY DEMANDED

ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ON THIS DAY, came to be heard DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, and the Court, having considered the Motion, the Response of Plaintiffs, the Response of Intervenor-Defendant, and arguments of counsel, is of the opinion that it is well taken and should in all things be GRANTED. It is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the depositions of Plaintiffs, J.M. Fail, Keith Latiolais, Carolyn Murphy, and James Fail shall not take place as now noticed. Plaintiffs shall be presented for deposition on or before _______________. J.M. Fail and Keith Latiolais shall be presented for deposition on or before _______________. Carolyn Murphy and James Fail shall be presented for deposition on or before _______________. SIGNED on this the ________ day of ____________________, 2007.

_________________________________ CHIEF JUDGE EDWARD J. DAMICH UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS